Puck Daddy - NHL

Chris Clark was 30 years old when he was named captain of the Washington Capitals in 2006, and he wasn't the obvious choice.

Alexander Ovechkin was coming off a torrid rookie campaign that clearly placed the franchise in his hands. Rival Sidney Crosby had been asked, and had declined, the captaincy in Pittsburgh; he felt he wasn't ready yet. Noting that, some clamored for Ovechkin to get the 'C' in Washington, both because he was the face of the team and because they assumed he'd ascend to it anyway.

But Clark was given the nod, with GM George McPhee going as far as to compare him to Dale Hunter in the pantheon of Capitals captains during the announcement.

Now 32, Clark's practically a senior citizen when it comes to NHL captains. Of the teams with permanent captains, 10 of them have a player 30-or-under wearing the 'C.'

Perhaps inspired by Crosby's success as Pittsburgh Penguins captain, three teams this offseason turned to players in their early 20s to lead: Jonathan Toews of the Chicago Blackhawks (20); Dustin Brown of the Los Angeles Kings (23); and Mike Richards of the Philadelphia Flyers (23). Rick Nash, 24, was named captain of the Columbus Blue Jackets late last season.

It's a trend that Clark said was a little surprising.

"I'm sure they're leaders, but I don't know them personally. But I don't know how older guys on the team feel about it," he said. "A lot of what comes from a captain is experience. They're great players, and they could be great leaders. But they can be leaders without being captains yet."

It's not hard to see how NHL captaincy has been forever altered -- ask Roberto Luongo about that. Just look at how they've changed over the last 30 years:

Team

1978

2008

Chicago Blackhawks

Keith Magnuson, 30

Jonathan Toews, 20

Los Angeles Kings

Mike Murphy, 27

Dustin Brown, 23

Philadelphia Flyers

Bobby Clark, 29

Mike Richards, 23

Pittsburgh Penguins

Orest Kindrachuk, 28

Sidney Crosby, 21

Still, a lot has been made about the naming of Toews as Blackhawks captain this offseason, with ESPN asking if he's "too young to lead" and then getting Steve Yzerman on the record as an endorsement of Toews's readiness.

The Blackhawks center told me he wasn't phased by the scrutiny.

"I didn't really focus or worry about that too much. Stuff like that is going to happen where you get a lot of attention," he said last weekend. "Since they named me captain, I'm excited. I'm pumped for the challenge. And that's all I'm really worried about."

The comments by Chicago Blackhawks management after the firing of Denis Savard have, by now, been excavated for hidden meaning by everyone. Steve Rosenbloom of the Chicago Tribune, for example, believes the phrase "organizational decision" means Scotty Bowman is running the show.

But this quote from GM Dale Tallon struck me, regarding the switch to Coach Joel Quenneville:

"We felt we needed a more experienced person in that position and that's why we made that decision."

One could assume Tallon was strictly speaking about Savard, who was four games into his third season behind an NHL bench when he was canned. But my thoughts immediately went to what a veteran coach means for an exceptionally young team that has a 20-year-old captain.

The proximity between center Jonathan Toews's player-only meeting, held without Savard's knowledge, and the coaching change could be coincidental. Or could it have been a harbinger that something in the team's power structure needed to change?

Both the Blackhawks and the Flyers have struggled out of the gate. In Richards's case, Philadelphia beat writer Tim Panaccio has questioned how he'll respond to his "first crisis" as team captain and that "how well Richards handles it could say volumes in the future."

After last night's loss to the Colorado Avalanche, Richards told reporters: "Well, you can't point anything out if you're not doing it yourself, so I don't think there's too many guys in the dressing room, including myself, who have had such great games that you can point fingers."

There are captains who do their best leading on the ice. Richards has three goals in four games. Brown has two assists in three games for the Kings. But Nash has one goal (and one point) in three games, while Toews has one assist in four games.

Clark said the extra pressure of wearing the 'C' can be a detriment to a young player. "If you are young, it's more weight on your shoulders. Younger guys should maybe concentrate on being better players, maybe having more fun," he said.

As Crosby and Vincent Lecavalier have shown, leadership and exemplary play can co-exist in the same youthful player.

It's too early for judgment; and in the end, being a successful captain has less to do with team record and personal stats than it does with the perception of their teammates.

"The problem you can have as a captain in our league is when the players don't feel like you're sincere or that you have the team's best interest at heart," Blue Jackets Coach Ken Hitchcock told the Canadian Press. "I think that's why the players like Rick so much is that they see a level of sincerity that's very, very high and I think they really like what he brings to the table."

digg delicious
more

44 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. riverdragon37
    1. Posted by riverdragon37 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    That's a hilarious shot of Toews... lol! :)
  2. GT
    2. Posted by GT Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's easy being a 20 year old captain. You just have to alter the sentences you say in the locker room. So, if things are not going well, instead of saying "Guys, we've been in this situation before and this is what we need to do to get out of it" he can simply say "Guys, these situations have happened to the guys in here that I send out to buy me liquor and I'm assuming this can be a way to get out of it? Not sure though 'cause it's the first time I've come across it."
  3. The Forechecker
    3. Posted by The Forechecker Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I would question whether the Yzerman endorsement really means much; think about it - for a long time, the Red Wings underperformed in the playoffs, and #19 came close to being traded to Ottawa before championships late in his career transformed his legacy into suddenly being one of the great leaders in the sport. Can we really say that being named captain at a young age was the best thing either for himself or the team?
    Might the Red Wings have done better in the early- to mid-90's with someone else in that role? We'll never know, of course, but for 10+ years, Yzerman's captaincy was notable for disappointment on the game's biggest stage.
  4. Wilf
    4. Posted by Wilf Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ah, the Kindrachuk years. He led that team with a firm hand on the rudder.
  5. Wilf
    5. Posted by Wilf Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @3, even Captain-gods like Mark Messier can't will their team to win when they're at a significant talent deficit. And I can't think of anybody else on those Wings teams who was more captainly than Yzerman. Although Gerard Gallant certainly had a way with referees.
  6. Megatron
    6. Posted by Megatron Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    4th to last paragraph Wysh. Determent = Detriment
  7. Wyshynski
    7. Posted by Wyshynski Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Robert O --
    Thank you for the copy edit, sir. And here I was worried I'd call him Taves.
  8. The Forechecker
    8. Posted by The Forechecker Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wilf: John Ogrodnick and Mike O'Connell were also solid vets around that time, and you're right that captains can't make chicken soup out of chicken... well, you know. And also understand, I'm a huge fan of Yzerman.
    That said, Yzerman's leadership abilities were very much in question during the first half of the 1990's as one playoff defeat piled on top of another. It wasn't until they actually won the cup that he was suddenly proclaimed to be at a near-Messier level of leadership. I just don't put much stock in young captains, it strikes more as hype than anything else.
  9. Megatron
    9. Posted by Megatron Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm available for hire. I work for money preferably, but I would accept tickets to Wild games.
  10. jay9p1
    10. Posted by jay9p1 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am a big Yzerman fan myself and yes I believe Yzerman had to grow into his role, was he put in charge of a team at too early of an age? I don't know, but you're right the Wings did struggle in the following years after he was named captain. I believe that the C should be worn by a veteran player that has been around the game of hockey. Granted a young stars talent on the ice may be more superior then other Veterans on the team, but that doesn't make him a good captain. Younger players are more likely to listen to Veteran players, not the other way around. My God, there not accustom to adversity and pressure the way most of these veterans are. Then again, most of the teams mentioned with young Captains are below average to average teams (with the exception of Pittsburg). Only time will tell how this all pans out!
  11. riverdragon37
    11. Posted by riverdragon37 Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Forechecker... Kinda like Joe Sakic's leadership abilities as they relate to success while on a Quebec team that stunk out loud was in question before the Colorado Era?
    Face it... Up until the early 90's the Red Wings sucked... Harry Truman with a little red button wired to the opposing bench couldn't have gotten any playoff success with those Wings teams... Mid-90's... Yeah... Yzerman took a bit of heat... But so did Bowman.
    Put it this way... Messier has the heart of a brontosaurus... but even Steve Erkel could have lead Gretzky, Kurri, Coffey, Fuhr & Company (in their primes) to a Cup...
  12. mitchconnor
    12. Posted by mitchconnor Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Richards initially turned down an offer to captain the Flyers at the end of the regular season; after thinking about it all summer, and having serious discussions with Stevens, Holmgren and his teammates, he accepted the C.
    As Wysh pointed out, the Flyers are not losing because of Richards, or any of their captains for that matter. The three guys who have shown up for every game are Richards, Gagne, and Timonen.
    The issues with the Flyers have to be handled off the ice. Richards does everything he can to help the team win on the ice, but the others are not following suit. That is a reflection on them for dragging their asses. The onus is on Richards to right the ship though, and I think he will. For what it's worth, the last 2 times the Flyers started their season this poorly, the ended up in the Conference Finals both times.
  13. Helmbock
    13. Posted by Helmbock Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dustin Brown is actually very much the traditional prototype NHL captain -- a second-tier skill player who skates hard every shift and who plays hard in all three zones of the ice. I believe he led his team in hits last season, which also very much fits the mold of a traditional NHL captain.
  14. cantgetanywirtz
    14. Posted by cantgetanywirtz Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cup#12.....
    You reading this and taking notes??? LMAO
  15. cm
    15. Posted by cm Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Even though I'm against giving status to players who haven't established anything, there are always exceptions to the rule, but few and far between. It seems that when the young player gets the C or the offer, it is generally a statement by the ownership that this is where the team's future will be. Marleau struggled in SJ, but he got a cast of vets to step up. Even the ones who weren't captains. You tell me no one will listen to Roenick or now Blake just because they don't wear a C.
  16. Nivin
    16. Posted by Nivin Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    its funny how so many people think they know what its like being a captain for a professional team.
  17. Rumpelstilzchen
    17. Posted by Rumpelstilzchen Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As if I'd listen to a 20 year old with 1 year experience. As if I'd listen to a 20 year old period.
    20 years old should go score goals and then go out and get drunk and get tail.
  18. cm
    18. Posted by cm Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Nivin
    I think the general feeling is there is a progression in any leadership capacity. You establish yourself, earn the respect of your peers, then take a lead role. Doesn't matter if it's pro sports or a blue collar job. Point is, you have to earn it. Like I pointed out, there are exceptions. Don't discount the rule.
  19. Bryan
    19. Posted by Bryan Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    They'll be fine.
  20. Myself
    20. Posted by Myself Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Not all captains act like captains. In fact, most captains don't act like captains. Brenden Morrow, Sidney Crosby and Vincent Lecavalier are the only captains I know who act like captains. I know just how it's like being a captain in the NHL - very hard. Patrick Marleau, Nicklas Lidstrom, Jarome Iginla, Mike Richards and many other captains don't act like captains. Richards bullies Crosby, Lidstrom always cheats, and Iginla fights more than anyone. Someone who acts like a captain sets a good example. On the other hand, there's some people that act like captains that aren't. Like Zetterberg. Detroit is such a loser team. They picked the wrong captain. Then again, Detroit is meant to be an evil team, so they picked the most evil person to be the captain. A captain isn't meant to be evil though. Calgary is a stupid team. Their captain is so stupid. He's not even their best player. How dumb could they be?
  21. J P
    21. Posted by J P Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Oh, and as a footnote, you can't blame Mike Richards. The Flyers are losing because their front office is Amish to a fault. Can they hire just ONE person from the outside to right the ship? How many washed up third liners from the late '70's version of the Flyers really need to be in the front office before a non-Flyer can come in and erase a third of a century of failure? No cup for 33 years, two weeks and counting. At this rate, Enron has a better chance of reforming than the Flyers have of winning a Cup.
  22. Gianluca G
    22. Posted by Gianluca G Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    dustin Brown è il meglio!
    He is one of the best young players in the NHL.
    He gets no attention due to playing in Los Angeles but I'm sure his time will come with the mass media.
  23. Slodeth
    23. Posted by Slodeth Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The captain has to be able to connect with everyone.
    1. Over 30.
    2. A defenseman.
    3. One who leads by example.
    4. An extrovert.
    5. Slightly weird.
    6. Ruthless professional.
  24. Ryan M
    24. Posted by Ryan M Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    #25 why should a captain have to fit into any category? Shouldn't he just be the person who helps the team win the most? Crosby got his team to the finals last year, hes 21 and not a defenseman

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™