Puck Daddy - NHL

Coverage of the trade frenzy this week proved that hockey journalism has been forever changed for the better (despite the occasional exceptions) thanks to the blogosphere.

When GM George McPhee gets on a conference call and explains in astonishing detail the negotiations between the Washington Capitals and goalie Cristobal Huet, those details are now provided to fans nearly verbatim. You're still not getting that level of reporting from a newspaper.

But thanks to the influence of the Web, the MSM is providing that kind of reporting through its own alternative media, like Rich Hammond's remarkable Inside the Kings blog for the Los Angeles Daily News. He has a word-by-word interview with Rob Blake's agent Pat Brisson that explains why the free-agent defenseman decided to leave the Los Angeles Kings for the San Jose Sharks yesterday, and it's one hell of a read. The money passage, in Brisson's words:

"So finally at 11 or noon, Dean [Lombardi, Kings GM] texts me and he says that it's important that we get this done but we can only get this done when I see what's happening with other things. If it's a cap (maximum) team, I would understand. But when we're talking about a (salary cap) floor team and we're talking about a player who is willing to give his experience and play in that role we're talking about, I need an answer. So, Rob called Dean. He's not a 20-year-old player. He has no problem calling the GM directly. Dean told him, 'We're not prepared to do this right now.' How do you think that makes the asset feel? When I saw (sic) 'asset,' I mean the player. So he looked at the situation and he said, 'Pat, I think it might be time to look at other offers and maybe a team that might want me for another role.'"

We forget so often during this financial insanity that for many of these players -- and certainly players with Blake's mileage -- it all comes down to a sense of being wanted; the comfort that the team you're playing for appreciates your talent and makes you a priority. It may all be boardroom, back-slapping negotiation lip-service; but for a guy like Blake, who played parts of 14 seasons with the Kings, it's all he needs to hear in order to sign on.

Which brings us to Dan Boyle, who could be joining Mr. Blake very shortly.

Boyle's agent George Bazos was given permission to speak with other teams by the Tampa Bay Lightning and told Damian Cristodero of Lightning Strikes today that San Jose is "a place he's very happy to be." So TSN reports that Boyle and defenseman Brad Lukowich to the Sharks for 23-year old defenseman Matt Carle, a first round draft pick, a prospect and a fourth-round pick is just about done.

So in the span of a week we've gone from "Lightning management" telling Bazos that it wants Boyle to stay and Boyle saying he's not going to waive his no-trade clause, to Dan Boyle being thisclose to joining the Sharks. Lord knows the threats of waivers and other sneaky managerial tricks that Bolts threatened probably convinced Boyle to drop his NTC. But in the end, perhaps it's as simple as this: New owners, new coach, and no county for $6.667 million-per-season old defensemen.

As much as Boyle wanted to stay, he wasn't going to stay where he's not wanted.

From a Tampa perspective, shedding Boyle's salary was a must after the spending spree of the summer. But he was the only stud on the blueline for this team, and his departure will create even more questions about the collection of warm bodies separating the Bolts' all-star cast at forward and their already questionable goaltending. (Kolzig? Really?)

But the return is strong: A couple of picks and Carle, who still has a world of potential that's yet to be fulfilled. (And since no Oren Koules move can be made without some oddity, what to make of the David Carle draft-day saga now?)

From a San Jose perspective, the signing of Blake is being hailed as a move that made the Sharks Stanley Cup contenders again. PJ Swenson said he's the team's first true power-play quarterback. We Bleed Teal is bowing down to a right-handed shot coming to San Jose.

Adding Boyle, the Sharks have the best defensive unit (on paper) the franchise has ever had; yes, even better than the solid group that helped San Jose to the conference finals in 2004. To be able to say that with Brian Campbell out in Chicago is a rather startling thing.

So everyone wins here (outside of maybe the Kings). Tampa cuts salary, San Jose salvages its off-season, and Blake and Boyle find a team that appreciates them.

digg delicious
more

43 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. KeithF
    1. Posted by KeithF Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's tough to see Danny go, he was often the cog that got the offense going. He's worth every penny for every minute he'll give the Sharks. Other than injuries, he never gave less than 100%. Thanks for the great years Mr. Boyle.
  2. spindr
    2. Posted by spindr Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yes,yes,yes,yes,yes! Finally what this team needed! No team wins The Cup without solid D, and capable puck-moving D. There's nothing wrong with the Sharks forwards that can't be fixed by getting them the puck with space. If you watched both the Calgary and Dallas series, they were able to press the Sharks forwards both 5-on-5 and on the power play. That won't happen so easily now with the experience of Blake and the puck carrying capability of Boyle. I loved Brian Campbell, but this is SWEET!
  3. Heffer
    3. Posted by Heffer Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sweet. DW decided to make his "deadline deal" now rather than March. Plus its not for a rental as we will have Boyle for a few years.
  4. Kelly
    4. Posted by Kelly Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And DW comes through once again!
  5. Yvette Francisco
    5. Posted by Yvette Francisco Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There is more to sports then the name on the back of the jersey. Congrats to San Jose for buying the name Blake however as an avid King fan, I can tell you the player that wears that jersey past his prime 2 years ago. See you in the Hall of Fame Blakey.
  6. Steve
    6. Posted by Steve Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Blake and Roenick, thank god for old skool...
  7. Kingfan1967
    7. Posted by Kingfan1967 Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    if you're looking to Blake as "solid d", you might want to look at tapes of 3 or 4 seasons ago and ignore 95% of last season. $5 million is a lot to pay for someone who is 3/4 of the way on the downhill side, both in terms of age and skills. good luck.
  8. marleau go away
    8. Posted by marleau go away Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It was a lot to give but I've never felt so assured with Sharks' blueline since...forever~
  9. sandy g
    9. Posted by sandy g Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dan I am in SHOCK just as you are. I am so sorry our new owners are so STUPID. I wish you all the BEST in SAN JOSE and will continue to be a DAN FAN! Thanks for the years here in Tampa and you will be MISSED more than you know. You are a class guy and GREAT hockey player with a GREAT future so San Jose is LUCKY to get you.
    I will definately have to go to San Jose to see you play in person during the season. I can not believe how the ownership handled this situation and how they could do this to a player who has been so good for our team.
    Bring home another stanley cup next year
    THE BEST TO YOU DAN & AMBER,
    Sandy & Judy
  10. neelpawar
    10. Posted by neelpawar Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm confused...are they thinking they're going to be able to get david carle cleared to play and have a brother defensive duo or what? It's kind of like they're going through the phone book and saying "this name is familiar, let's trade for him".
  11. triphomer
    11. Posted by triphomer Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i was really excited to watch the sharks defense next year until they later announced that they traded craig rivet away for two second round draft picks. they didnt even get a player for one of their most consistent defenseman last year
  12. spindr
    12. Posted by spindr Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    To: #11
    Yeah, I didn't see the Rivet thing coming. It makes me think Doug W. may not be finished yet.
  13. Boowers
    13. Posted by Boowers Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I have to ask Sharks fans because I don't know.
    Was Ron Wilson not liked by the players or fans or was it just time for a change?
  14. Mr Upland
    14. Posted by Mr Upland Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Zittsberg birds was a one hit wonder like the assheim quacks step aside nhl the wing wheel is steaming bye! later loser's, wings in 2009, 10, 11, 12, it just keeps going.......
  15. Dallas
    15. Posted by Dallas Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    FInally - don't let the screen door hit you on the way out Blakey ! I am a long time (suffering) Kings fan of 40 years & while Rob was great in his day, no question abouit it, he is a shell of his former self. I stopped liking him when he chased the money to Colorado & back to the Kings & now he's doen it yet again, proving his motives! He can take the 5 grand the Sharks gave away & he can take his -19 with him ! He's no longer a scoring threat, he was out of position more often than not past season & he is very slow of foot now. Take the money & run should be his theme song!
  16. bullocks
    16. Posted by bullocks Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:15 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Boyle plays defense? Did i miss something!?
    Great puck moving defenseman. Not so good at the defensive side of things.
  17. shoelois
    17. Posted by shoelois Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    lets see,one team offers you 5 million,another team offers you 10 million. which one would you take? they don't play sports for the loyalty of the team,they're there to make as much as they can while they can still play. they have goods to offer, they're allowed to get as much as they can for those goods. that's the american way
  18. Dallas
    18. Posted by Dallas Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Agreed but I guess I still admire the athletes of the 60's & 70's; ever hear of Lyman Bostock ? He was signed by the then Ca. Angels, & didn't perform up to his previous years, so he went into owner Gene Autry's office & asked for the Angels to take back his salary for that year & Gene said while he admired Lyman & his stance, he would not hear of it, so Lyman got what he signed for, but didn't feel he dsereved, & within a few months, he was killed in an auto accident, I believe it was. A great Role Model he was. Point is, today's ahem, "athlete's" are self centered, pompous & greedy - I mean, Joe Blow can't live on 5 Mil, but can on 10 ? Give me a freaking break!
    And while on $$, I am sick & tired of "renegotiations"! I mean you signed a contract, whenever it was & now, it's no longer good enough ? Screw you Joe Athlete! I know in my job, I have to accept what they pay me as that's the contract we ratified & must live with it until the current contract ends & these guys whine because their 50 Mil contract is no longer suitable for them, in the MIDDLE of a contract ?! I don't think so - no matter what the other guys may make, fact is, you & your employer signed a binding agreemnet in what was thought as good faith & you damn well better live up to it ! & Dread Colletti makes another huge mistake w/ Andrew Jones - you think Jones is going to give back any part of his 18+ Mil this year for his little league like numbers ? Hell no he won't tho' he damn well should & be a man & give back even 4-5 Mil, in good faith as he is NOT living up to his contract! Injury aside, he & so many others like him, were not paid huge multi million dollar salaries to bat a buck or less & how abopuit Barry Zito & his 100+ Mil deal - another greedy jerk who could certainly afford to give back 20 Mil for non production & still live on 80+ Mil ! No, Greed by modern day sports figures are killing the sports as we once knew them.
  19. shoelois
    19. Posted by shoelois Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    you're right. they're the lowest team on the minimum salary paid. they have to make up the millions they gave pretty boy beckham so his wife can continue her hollywood ways. the owners have never been to a hockey game since they bought the team. they just needed the assurance from the city of los angeles that they could put any real estate they wanted around the staples center
  20. gold_fish323
    20. Posted by gold_fish323 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ 13 Boowers
    It was really a mixed response here in san jose when wilson got fired. some fans thought that wilson was the reason that the team wasn't going deep into the playoffs, even with such big names as joe thornton. others cited his playoff/regular season record as a good reason to keep him. personally, i thought it was time for a change. after 3 straight seasons of round 2, game 6 exits, it was time to go for ron. as far as players were concerned, there were always rumors of tension between marleau/wilson. but i think, overall, the team was ok with him.
  21. Dallas
    21. Posted by Dallas Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:34 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dutch, yea, I have made several MLB posts, re: Dread Colletti. I feel Blake can only inspire by his presence, to those young players who as kids, may well remember him in hos Prime -to me, his skill are all but gone. Sure, he will make a play now & again, but good riddance & the Sharks may well have to find out the hard way. I would love to see MLB adopt a hard cap & do away w/ this luxury Tax BS - it really doesn't help the small markets, as the Sux, Crankees & our Dodgers will just pay the 10%, whereas the smaller teams cannot afford that. But that's another story ! Happy 4th all !
  22. milkshake_greg
    22. Posted by milkshake_greg Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You gotta figure San Jose for a Stanley Cup fave next year ... if only they did not have to get past the Red Wings, now even stronger with Hossa ... and who in the East is supposed to be a contender? LOL LOL
  23. BRIAN S
    23. Posted by BRIAN S Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Blake is a tool and SJ clearly overpaid. perfect fit for SJ, his classless carpetbagging arse will complement Jeremy Roenick's fat mouth wonderfully
  24. BRIAN S
    24. Posted by BRIAN S Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Yeah, I didn't see the Rivet thing coming. It makes me think Doug W. may not be finished yet."
    2 words: cap space. $3.5M to be exact...
  25. WaltS
    25. Posted by WaltS Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Actually about $5.3 million left, with Goc, Ehrhoff, and Clowe to be signed. All three of those guys made about 2 million last year. I hear talk about McLaren possibly be moved out before the season starts.
    There's also talk about Bret Hedican, but I don't see the logic in an injury-prone defenseman replaceing another injury-prone defenseman (McLaren). Bieksa is being thrown around, but he's too expensive for the Sharks.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™