Puck Daddy - NHL

Earlier this season, journalist David Berry resigned his position with an Edmonton Oilers blog after an incident with the team's media relations staff. It was a story that continued the debate between mainstream and alternative media over access; more importantly, it ignited a fresh conversation about perceptions of "good taste" in coverage of the NHL, as Berry's blog Covered in Oil was frank, guileless and unabashedly coarse in its tone.

This month, a Boston Bruins blogger who writes under the Bueller-approved moniker "Cameron Frye" wasn't scrutinized in a press box or given a stern warning from the PR staff. She was terminated by New England Comcast Sportsnet for writing a lewd, satirical first-person account of life for a female reporter in a professional locker room for Deadspin.com.

"It stinks," she said in an interview this week. "Am I sorry? I am, but I'm not. I think I wrote a darn good piece."

The piece in question was part of Deadspin's "Waxing Off" series, in which female writers opine on a given subject. Frye submitted a (NSFW) riff on strange encounters in the locker room, filled with candid sexual terminology and slang. A safe-for-work snippet:

You just have to go in there and give them the same respect you'd expect back from them. Do you always get that? No, but in the end you're the bigger man and for some men out there, that's something they'll never be. The view of naked flesh doesn't bother me. Although, what does bother me is athletes who wear Crocs. Now that's offensive.

The story published on Friday, Dec. 12. By Dec. 28, and after the story was picked up by a Boston newspaper, Comcast said that due to the language and subject matter of the Deadspin piece, she would no longer be welcome as a blogger on their Wicked Good Sports site. They soon removed all of her previous content.

"According to them, even though I'm not a full-time employee I still represent them. Do I want to say it's a chick thing? That's one thing I haven't said. I just don't understand it. What I wrote was not that bad," she said.

So was it a case of crude language colliding with corporate standards? Was it because a woman broke a locker room taboo by talking about her experiences in a candid manner? And would the Bruins ever let Cameron Frye back in the press box after this incident?

Frye, 25, starting writing for Bostonist.com out of college, focusing on fashion. ("Much like Sean Avery," she said.) She transitioned into sports writing by hooking up with New England Comcast Sportsnet as a freelance blogger, covering the Bruins for a network that focuses mostly on the Celtics and the Patriots. She said she attended every game, and covered the team with a beat writer's focus.

After her Deadspin locker room story published under her penname, the Boston Sports site Barstool Sports took note and asked "Who Is Cameron Frye?" Then the Boston Herald's Inside Track column -- a quasi-"Page Six" for Beantown readers -- noticed the tale and called her bosses at Comcast for a reaction. As Deadspin noted in its follow-up, this attention was the catalyst for Frye's eventual firing.

From the Herald:

Cameron's commentary was quoted on barstoolsports.com late last week, and before you could say Bird Watcher, she was, uh, stripped of her Bruins blogging career at Comcast SportsNet!

"Cameron was a freelance blogger covering the Bruins for WickedGoodSports.com, but she is no longer blogging for WGS," said Comcast spokesguy Skip Perham. "She was not our employee. Obviously, her comments do not represent Comcast SportsNet."

"I think it had to do with the language, and the fact that it was picked up by Barstool and the Inside Track. And I don't like Crocs," she said, adding that Comcast was aware of her submission to Deadspin. "I used certain words. It's frickin' Deadspin. I'm not trying to throw anybody under the bus, but they knew."

If language was the issue, Frye sees this as another example why the paradigm needs to shift in the mainstream media. "If they want people to keep reading papers and buying papers, they're going to have to [accept this language]. The numbers are there. People aren't buying this stuff as much as they used to," she said.

But what if the issue wasn't just language? Clearly, Frye's tale received coverage from the Herald and scrutiny from Comcast because the subject it covered was a sports taboo -- a woman discussing life in the men's locker room.

Frye doesn't believe her article played into fears that female journalists can't approach the locker room in a non-sexual way. "I don't think so, because I don't approach the locker room in a sexual way. It's like going to a museum and seeing sculptures. People make something dirty in their own minds, projecting their agenda."

As for extra scrutiny because it was a woman discussing a professional locker room, Frye said:  "It's because we're supposed to be seen and not heard. They want women [in media] to be safe."

We asked another female hockey blogger (who asked her name not be used in the story) her take on the Cameron Frye matter. Her take:

"I'm saddened at the idea that a writer can be removed from her craft for being open, honest and humorous outside of her own journalistic assignment.  If you tell me her actions within the locker room were ever unprofessional or disrespectful, then by all means, she should be removed.  But if a 'journalist' or 'bloggerist' or 'twitterist' conducts them themselves appropriately in a room where appropriate dress is absent, how do you condemn them for expressing their thoughts in other mediums? 

"Certainly, there are things not to be discussed in retained print of any sort.  Surely the writer was told what topics are taboo if witnessed.  But come on, where's the wiggle room?  If, indeed, the case is that 'Cameron' broke explicit rules that came along with the privilege of being let into the inner sanctum, then sadly, I would have to understand. This is still a man's world, and there are invisible lines in the sand we dare not cross. Knowing where they are is always the hard part."

Comcast drew its line. But what about the Bruins?

Matt Chmura, the team's director of communications, said this week that the team was aware of the Cameron Frye situation: "I've read what you've read, as far as her being let go from Comcast."

But Chmura said her dismissal from Comcast doesn't necessarily mean her banishment from the press box.  "We evaluate every credential request on a game-by-game basis," he said, "and we review the request with the editor for that media."

In a positive twist in her career, Frye is now writing for Barstool, which has much looser standards on language and content than Comcast ever could.

She's taken her share of grief in the fallout from the locker room story. "But there are also people who said, 'Finally, someone who can write,'" she said.

digg delicious
more

28 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. hockeysteve54
    1. Posted by hockeysteve54 Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    [BLEEP] censorship!
  2. sleza
    2. Posted by sleza Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Obviously Comcast is owned by Bettman and he doesn't want to explain term "dangling sack" to his daughter
    That 300 poster on the wall, I wouldn't even notice whether there are or aren't hockey players in the room..
  3. Fox
    3. Posted by Fox Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I think I'm going to have to go with the opinion espoused by your second blogger (except for the use of "mediums"): it's a crappy deal, but I can see a Comcast PR suit doing this. Unlike most print media, Comcast is also in the business of making the Bruins look good (at least, I think they are; from their website, it is kind of difficult to tell if Comcast broadcasts the Bruins). As a broadcast partner, they probably do have an interest in cencoring the off-ice content distributed by their employees, and while they can't (or shouldn't) stop them from expressing such things, they are not required to either condone or pay for such actions either. Pretty weak that the immediate editorial staff did not see the possibility of this kind of outcome and warn the author, but it may be that the lines of communication from the office that was called for comment to the peripheral Bruins media content providers are ... limited (ever met Jill Nash, Wysh?). That said, I thought the piece was pretty damn entertaining, and I think Ms Frye will do just fine writing for entities unaffiliated with the organization being covered.
    As far as the gender issue goes, I think the Bruins' not revoking the press credential is enough to make me believe that it was the affiliation between the Bruins and Comcast that created the issue, not the gender of the author, though I think it is true that the gender of the author was the cause of the Herald grabbing the story; if you want to pillory them for cashing in on a story that they pretend to be above creating themselves, go for it.
    A gender question not raised: if some guy had written this about the Connecticut Sun (that's a WNBA team, I looked it up) for inclusion between Ovechkin hackjobs and penis enlargement ads in Maxim, he'd be getting crucified nationally, not landing a gig at Barstool, so there's that.
  4. Kev
    4. Posted by Kev Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm all for freedom of speech, but bad writing is just bad writing!
  5. Fox
    5. Posted by Fox Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Either ... either. Somewhere, a coven of media snicker into their crystal balls.
  6. Wrap Around Curl
    6. Posted by Wrap Around Curl Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:49 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I could leave a hugely wordy comment but instead I will go pithy;
    Damn the man, save the empire.
  7. carl_vs_mastershake
    7. Posted by carl_vs_mastershake Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:18 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'd Yelle about it too. It's not like someone was tying to Ryder.
  8. The Great One
    8. Posted by The Great One Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wait. Cameron Who? As your Official Bruins Comment Guru, I can honestly say that I've never heard of her. It's not like people get any worthwhile information from a Comcast website.
    Whatever. She should have just kept her damn mouth shut.
  9. Garth the Hoser
    9. Posted by Garth the Hoser Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    her column got pulled for that?? i could see if she provided measurements, but that was harmless.
  10. ranndino
    10. Posted by ranndino Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Read her piece. It was hilarious. I thought blogging was supposed to be witty and funny writing. Apparently, the corporate wankers at Comcast disagree and would like it to be as dry as your average PR release. Shame.
  11. Tanya H
    11. Posted by Tanya H Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:54 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm a female college student who is an aspiring NHL athletic trainer. After reading about all of this, I'm less confident in that happening than I have ever been.
  12. The Great One
    12. Posted by The Great One Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Tanya H:
    If you have blond hair, a small waist, a nice rack AND can flex some hamstrings, you're hired.
    Of course, if not, you could just be like Wysh: an NHL athletic supporter.
  13. sbctregwar1
    13. Posted by sbctregwar1 Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    All this does is continue the bs trend of PC safeness. If you even dare utter something that is viewed as obscene by one person-your ass is grass. But that's the bed we have made for ourselves with our sue happy culture
  14. themrkia
    14. Posted by themrkia Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:04 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    She got was she deserved. There is absolutely no need for her to use such language. The term "c*ck" is just vulgar. She should have been more professional and used less offensive terminology; like "schlong," or "meat-whistle." That's just common sense.
  15. 5 4 fighting
    15. Posted by 5 4 fighting Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is still a man's world, and there are invisible lines in the sand we dare not cross. Knowing where they are is always the hard part."
    I guess that the lines in the sand have become a little more clear. Its like a two year old pushing the envelope to see what is acceptable. But when the blogger/reporter/twitter becomes the news instead of being the eyes for the news - you should have known that you have already crossed the line.
    To give the excuse that it was Deadspin so it was no big deal what or even how I decided to write a piece should not even enter into the thought process. Conducting yourself in a professional manner no matter who you are should always come first, writing a junk yard style piece will define you to junk yard tabloids.
  16. Dan the Obliviousman
    16. Posted by Dan the Obliviousman Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I commend her for being a rare female blogger for a sports team with access to the locker room,but I find that her terminology did cross the line a bit as far as professional online journalism goes.She could have used other words than the ones she chose to use to describe the scene,and it may have come across the same to the reader...Thus getting her point across.
    As I read this story,I envisioned a world where even us that are posting anywhere on the internet will have to comply to a certain standard when we are posting...which seems to be in effect now,at least with most sites(including this one)where you can leave commentary on a certain subject.It is not necessarily censorship...I call it necessary editing,to prevent any fighting among the posters...And let's face it,if it not for them editing us,we would be constantly be on each others throats on here,and that is not what these blogs are intended for...They are meant to discuss things in a civil matter.If you have to vent about something on here then fine...but you could expect some venting back from people that have to vent about a certain opinion that you just posted.
    It is human nature. :)
  17. paddy
    17. Posted by paddy Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:49 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I just read that the Montreal Pretenders have placed 4 starters on the All Star team. Are you kidding me? As a Flyers fan, it really shouldn't bother me 'cause they'll just fold like last year. But, as I check the standings, I believe they are in 2nd place. This allows them 4 starters? This is just as bad as their baseball team. Oh, I mean their basketball team. Oh, I mean their NFL franchise. Oh, they only have a hockey team?
  18. Crazy Larry
    18. Posted by Crazy Larry Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Read the deadspin article. A fluff piece that was a mole hill, now made into a mountain. Maybe a make up call to balance out the Avery thing. But in the immortal words of some who's name I can't remember..."F%@$ em if they can't take a joke,"
  19. Rick
    19. Posted by Rick Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This is a load of crap. There was nothing wrong with her article, she did not call out any players and did not cross any lines. I would bet that the player she referred to mooning her isn't even she was referring to him. We used to intentionally do things just like that when a female reporter walked into the locker room just to feel her out. The other guys in the room would be watching to judge her reaction. It happens in every locker room in every sport. Unless there is something more going on that they are not telling, this woman got screwed.
  20. Zenith#40
    20. Posted by Zenith#40 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    This totally sucks. A mountain out of a molehill is correct !
    Why does society swing back and forth from 2009 to 1959 randomly ?
    I am not familiar with that blog, but, is it popular with "innocent, virgin-eared" minors ?
    (Are there any "innocent, virgin eared minors" ?)
    Once the story got picked up and placed in a stronger light - it becomes the fault of whoever authorized that...not the writer.
    Her piece was well written, and I hope that she get hired elsewhere.
    Wysh...I gotta say buddy...you could be next...society seems to have a blood lust for chopping people down.
    Freedom, people !
    This is America !
    Act like it !
  21. dentophobia
    21. Posted by dentophobia Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I laughed.
  22. MarkT
    22. Posted by MarkT Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:42 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Remember, a woman with a foul mouth wrote Slap Shot!
  23. Bill
    23. Posted by Bill Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Casino dump!
  24. tyandersonowns
    24. Posted by tyandersonowns Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Why are we giving this hack her own story? Nobody knows or cares who she is in Boston, she's probably a talentless writer who decided she had to go for the 13 year old potty humor to get people to read past her first paragraph of mindless garbage.
    She's an embarassment to journalists and female journalists.
  25. Twinkie Nose
    25. Posted by Twinkie Nose Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:20 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Other then the bigger man part I don't see anything wrong with the article, especially the language thing. That was BS because in some of the other blogs the used @$$. I laughed, those articles were hilarious, and I applaud these ladies b/c I don't think I could have held a straight face, of course I am only 19 and still a little immature.

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™