Sat May 09, 2009 1:23 pm EDT
In yesterday's Puck Headlines, we pointed to a Hamilton Spectator article about a "mystery suitor" that was also interested in bringing an NHL franchise to the southern Ontario city.
The Spectator (via the Toronto Star) reports today that the franchise is the Atlanta Thrashers and the suitor is a Vancouver-based hockey group "believed to be led by Vancouver developer Tom Gaglardi," which could meet with Hamilton Mayor Fred Eisenberger as early as Monday. From the Spectator:
A source confirmed this week that Gaglardi, president of Northland Properties, the parent company of Sandman Hotels, is the key principal in the second hockey group interested in Hamilton. Gaglardi failed in his bid to buy the Vancouver Canucks five years ago ...
One source said the Atlanta move to Hamilton would be temporary, possibly to give the group time to relocate the franchise to a more permanent site following the 2010 season.
Let's see: The Coyotes go to Kitchener, Atlanta goes to Hamilton, then you realign the Ottawa Senators, Toronto Maple Leafs and Buffalo Sabres and boom ... The Nearly All-Ontario division.
The Thrashers are a vulnerable organization because of ongoing disputes between warring factions of ownership and the financial consequences from consecutive seasons of Incredible Hulk-like leaps backwards after making the postseason for the first time. Of course, much like with the beleaguered Phoenix Coyotes, the baffling mismanagement of the on-ice product has served as the catalyst for other crippling ills.
A source in Atlanta told us: "I'm assuming there’s nothing to it until I hear otherwise." And there's absolutely zippy in the Spectator article about talks with the Thrashers or an actual offer being made, so this becomes one of about a thousand "interested parties" stories we'll read in the wake of the Coyotes' situation. (Incidentally, Puck Daddy is interested in buying the Lightning and moving them to Guam; we wait patiently for coverage from the Coconut Telegraph.)
But it's clearly poaching season on U.S. non-traditional market franchises, and the legal ramifications of the Bettman/Balsillie/Coyotes mess could affect that.
The Arizona Republic reports that Coyotes owner (or whatever) Jerry Moyes is claiming that the NHL's refusal to allow the sale to Balsillie "violates state and federal antitrust laws." Should the court find that to be true, what implications will that hold for NHL processes like Board of Governors' approval rof future owners and NHL markets?
One final thought on the Coyotes, via my conversation with Jeff Marek on HNIC Radio yesterday: Is this really about the NHL being steamed over a team relocating to southern Ontario before the League can reap the windfall of massive expansion fees for a new franchise in that region?
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Montreal 5, Columbus 3 (Nov. 24)
Posted Nov 23 2009
Posted Nov 23 2009
Top Goals of the Week: November 24
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
89 Comments
1 - 24 of 89
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
These aren't the go go days any more. Take what you can get. More hockey teams in Canada is good. Just make sure ticket prices are reasonable. When you get more teams, you sell more jerseys. Hopefully that will help make up for not getting expansion fees. It's the economy, stupid. Deal with it.
Report Abuse
The Thrashers had several sell-outs the season they made the playoffs, and both of the playoff games sold out as well. There are hockey fans here, but they only show up when the team wins. The last game of the season this year was a sell-out, and attendance improved the 2nd half of the year because the team started playing better. This isn't a market who will support a team through good and bad and average times. The success of a franchise in Atlanta depends upon the product on ice, and that depends on competent ownership who are more concerned about running a team than they are about fighting in court.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Your war is over Mr. Bettman. My condolences. The bums lost.
http://puckreport.blogspot.com
Report Abuse
FTFY.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I wish that people would stop trying to turn this discussion into Where in North America is Carmen Sandiego. The Leafs have been average for the past 10 years. Oh noes! It's all because they're in Toronto! Move them to a different city and then they're going to be WONDERFUL. Wonder why we don't hear that argument... when a traditional market city's team is horrible, we hear the blame being placed in the right spots. When a non-traditional market team has troubles, it's all the location and fans' fault. Use some common sense.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
As for the Vancouver group, could this be a way for the league to convince the courts they have other offers to move into the 'underserved market,' or is this a serious rival to Balsillie for the obviously hockey-mad area? I just wonder where they have been in the past few years (if he bid on the Canucks before, is he a 'league man' doing a favour for to the league for legal arguments to get a better job later a la Leopold?)
Either way, someone should get it done, and the team managers should be putting pressure on the commissioner to get a team there and end the slow death of franchises. And, once they finally do get a team, they should call it 'Ontario something' (wolfpack?) in order to maximize on the half dozen Southwestern cities over 100,000. I know a lot of Londoners who would find it hard cheering for a Kitchener team. And MLSE, your arguments are laughable that it will take lots of money away from your franchise. There is still a decade long waiting list to buy season tickets, and if you want a ticket (even when they are knocked out of the playoffs against another horrible team), you need $300 or you get laughed at by scalpers. A little competition would hurt you about as much as a kids lemonade stand hurts starbucks.
Good luck businessmen and lawyers, sorry to rant.
DC
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
how about screw the thrashers, coyotes and all those teams.
if there ever was a phoenix atlanta finals, (god forbid) the nhl would fall helplessly
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 89