Puck Daddy - NHL

Not a good week for puckheads with DirecTV, which continues to keep the Versus network off of its system in a negotiating standoff that's now in its seventh week.

Last night's upset by the Buffalo Sabres over the Detroit Red Wings was unavailable to DTV subscribers in both hockey-mad cities. More tragically, the Chicago Blackhawks' comeback win over the Calgary Flames on Monday -- one of the greatest regular-season rallies in NHL history -- was invisible for the DirecTV viewership.

The latter blackout had Mark Kiley from Blackhawks Confidential super steamed:

Not only did I not have the option to watch the game, neither did 18 million other DirecTV subscribers.  Way to sell the game Bettman.  You're a frickin' genius.  The pressure you have applied to both Comcast and DirecTV to negotiate a compromise has produced what so far?  Nothing.  Once again selling the NHL is nothing more than an afterthought on the American sports landscape.

Why has Bettman not at least pulled the exclusive rights from Versus?  Surely, he didn't enter into agreement that gave him no outs if the NHL audience shrunk by 18 million.  Bettman should pull the exclusive rights deal and allow the clubs local broadcasters to televise the games as well.  Doing so would also free up the NHL network to air classic contests such as last night's Hawks-Flames game.

Yes, pull the exclusive rights from the only cable network willing to ante up massive coin for the NHL, and in the process break that contract -- one assumes there isn't an "out" clause for a situation like this -- to appease a sliver of the television audience, while undercutting Versus for the rest of the hockey viewing public. Now that's "frickin' genius."

This isn't to say that the dispute isn't a massive headache for the League, because it is. There's some hope between the sides, which is good news. But some other developments with Versus and Comcast are even better news for Bettman and his much-maligned U.S. TV deal. Could his gamble actually pay off?

Know this: DirecTV and Versus are talking. This is good news in a negotiation that's been anything but harmonious.

The bad news is that DirecTV continues to muddy the waters in this dispute by claiming that Versus is asking for an untenable rate hike; which is a statement that's picked up by local media whenever this dispute hits home. As we reported exclusively this month, Versus has a "zero total dollar increase" proposal on the table that apparently hasn't greased the gears to end this standoff -- even if it rendered the DirecTV "rate hike" outrage moot.

What's the solution in the short-term? Taking away exclusivity for live games from Versus is a non-starter, but Stu Hackel of the New York Times offers this idea:

If the league wants to help its fans here, the least it could do would be to run the Versus games delayed on the NHL Network in the scheduled spot where it replays games from the previous night.

Those slots are very early morning and the afternoon and it wouldn't be a solution, but the games wouldn't be live and probably wouldn't violate any exclusivity agreements with Versus. Viewers could at least record the games and watch at their convenience, which is better than nothing for now and would be a gesture to fans from a league that could do a little bit better here.

Not a bad thought, even if watching moldy games on cable in an Internet world may be more about an olive branch than something to which fans would flock.

You know what fans do flock to? The NFL. The Olympics. College football. Big-time golf events. Say, doesn't NBC have those relationships? Comcast, the parent company for Versus, knows it does, which is why it's sniffing around a purchase of NBC Universal. From the Wall Street Journal:

Versus is in 75 million homes and averaged 125,000 viewers this year through Oct. 4, up 17% from a year earlier, according estimates from Nielsen Co. "We have a huge opportunity," [Comcast exec Jeff] Shell said of Versus at the June marketing conference in New York, to create "another sports brand in America," he said. Still, Versus's average number of viewers is less than a seventh of ESPN's, and just over a third of that on ESPN2.

Winning new sports rights would cost money on top of NBC Universal's already hefty commitments, including more than $600 million a year for its NFL games, and the $2 billion it has committed for the next two Olympics. Many packages of rights are already locked up for years.

But size could bring other advantages. College-sports conferences, in particular, want deals that cover multiple outlets to air more of their events. ESPN has been most able to do so, for instance, putting one game on ABC and another on ESPN2.

Indeed. Versus would, in theory, receive bigger-time college football and the Olympic spillover that networks like CNBC receive from the parent network.

While the NFL's Sunday Night Football games would certainly remain on NBC, there would be a chance to bring the network's personalities and some semblance of NFL coverage to Versus as well.

When Bettman and the NHL chose OLN and Comcast as their cable partner after the lockout, it was because they were willing to pay significant rights fees for hockey -- much higher than what ESPN was offering. But it was also a wager that Comcast could add significant properties to the network in order to challenge ESPN's dominance on cable. It didn't land Major League Baseball. It didn't land the NFL. But college football, cage-fighting and Indy racing were incremental steps; joining the NBC family, and adding the NFL and the Olympics, would be a massive leap towards that goal.

There are always going to be those who say the NHL needs to be back on ESPN, and we've edged off the fence to agree with them. Should this deal between Comcast and NBC happen, it certainly changes the dynamic in that argument and, barring the end results, would validate Bettman's gamble on the fledgling cable net.

Hey: Color us optimistic on this one. You gotta have hope. Puck Buddy Lukes O. did about the DirecTV/Versus mess, and look what happened:

I am a university student in Pennsylvania that lives on campus. In our dorms we have a unique Direct TV package. We don't have a box in each room, we just plug into the wall. This morning to my surprise I put on Versus just to see if anything had changed and in fact it has, Versus was back on.

What's an education without Sports Soup and extreme fishing, right?

digg delicious
more

97 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Tito "TD" O'Dell
    1. Posted by Tito "TD" O'Dell Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:38 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Greg, just because your Comcast paycheques aren't as regular as your Yahoo paydays, it really shouldn't preclude you from disclosing that you do, indeed, occasionally work for Comcast.
    Without mentioning that fact, you do your own credibility no favours.
    That said, this particular anti-DTV article is far less biased than all of your previous Versus lovefests. Good work.
  2. Jerk Store
    2. Posted by Jerk Store Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:39 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    someone needs to chop that bettman photo into a "penis goes where?" pic
  3. Aaron
    3. Posted by Aaron Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:39 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    You know what would be a good idea (should Comcast actually buy NBC)? Putting hockey on NBC's Universal Sports channel. Since the DTV transistion, US has been available over the air as a subfeed to the NBC affiliate here in Atlanta. Their coverage of the IIHL tournament last year was hit-or-miss, but it was the best way to watch the games. Give us 2 or 3 games a week on Universal Sports, and the channel would pay for itself & then some with ad revenue.
  4. Wilf
    4. Posted by Wilf Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:45 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Frankly, if this hastens the inevitable move away from cable/satellite deals and toward a content-streaming deal, I'm all for this contract impasse. It'd be great if the NHL could get out in front of something for a change. I know it's not going to be easy killing off known distribution channels like national and regional sports networks, but content streaming is where things are going. And with the demographic of hockey fans, who as a group are smaller but more tech-savvy and urban than the fans of other pro sports, you can pull something like this off. The League needs to cut a deal with Netflix.
  5. Mark Tucker
    5. Posted by Mark Tucker Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:57 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Uh, did you just effectively write in 1000+ words that Versus is back on Directv?
    If so, you didn't make your point strong enough.
  6. Don A
    6. Posted by Don A Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:57 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Still doesn't address that VS. is a premium channel - on my Dish network, it's in the highest costing package and the channel has little else to offer in my eyes - I'd probably be better off buying the NHL package which nets out about the same cost over a year than paying for VS. There's no payoff anywhere, because I will ultimately do neither, as the rest of the sports world already is doing - nothing and no interest in the league.
  7. Mark Tucker
    7. Posted by Mark Tucker Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Aaron - I thought of that as well.
    I am a big cycling fan, and enjoyed the month of US Directv had in September. It would be like stepping back in terms of distribution (vs. VS), but has a different feel than OLN. Might attract a different viewership; perhaps better.
  8. PJ
    8. Posted by PJ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It's not cage fighting, it's not ultimate fighting, it's mixed martial arts. Welcome to the 21st Century. Dakar Rally, Tour de France, Tour of California, NCAA football, tennis, boxing, NHL, Indy Cars, contender kickboxing... there is a lot of solid content on Versus worth a look. Not sure how that is supposed to be a bad thing.
  9. Kevin L
    9. Posted by Kevin L Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I was actually holding off my decision to move from Comcast to DTV as my provider because DTV did not have the Versus channel.. Then I got to thinking that this will likely get figured out before the end of the season and according to the Blackhawks TV schedule I would only miss out on 7 games for the rest of the season (5 of those are home games so I could just buy tickets and only miss out on 2 games this year). In my mind 7 (or 2) games is a small price to pay to get away from Comcast's overpriced and awful service.
  10. Jay M
    10. Posted by Jay M Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Is that Tiki or Ronde? Oh no ring, must be Tiki!
  11. David
    11. Posted by David Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I hate Comcast they are holding me hostage jagoffs!!!!
  12. Kevin N
    12. Posted by Kevin N Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    versus is not back on direct tv. why are you implying this?
  13. knucklehead
    13. Posted by knucklehead Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:26 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Wilf....cuz NBA fans aren't urban :)....how's that sister of yours anyway? That still kills me!
  14. Mike Bro.
    14. Posted by Mike Bro. Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:28 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There is another issue at play here that isn't getting a mention. I am a DirecTV subscriber but I am also an NHL Center Ice subscriber. The Center Ice package is a service of the NHL. The NHL claims if I subscribe to Center Ice, I "won't miss a single hit, goal, or save." The CBC is not available on DirecTV yet CBC games are shown via Center Ice. Rogers Sportsnet is not available on DirecTV yet their games are on Center Ice. I could give a toss whether VS is available on DirecTV but those games should be shown on Center Ice because I paid for them. If Bettman want's to take sides between Comcast and DirecTV (let's never forget Comcast owns the Flyers) that's fine. But he should have made sure the Center Ice subscribers were taken care of.
  15. Matt
    15. Posted by Matt Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @TD
    thanks for the advisory that wysh occasionally works for comcast.
    @wysh
    don't you think that would be an important disclosure to make? are you kidding me? i've been reading your blog a few times a week since the beginning of last season, but this puts a huge point against you and your so called credibility.
  16. Andrew Muck
    16. Posted by Andrew Muck Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Just checked my DirecTV here in Ohio, still no Versus. But if you have DirecTV, they are offering Center Ice at half price for the season in compensation for the lack of Versus. I wouldn't be able to afford Center Ice otherwise. While I don't get the games on Versus, I'm getting like 3/4 of the other NHL games instead. I'm loving this dispute!
  17. blurt
    17. Posted by blurt Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    @TD
    get real dude. that wysh sometimes works for comcast has no bearing on this story. he answers only to his conscience, and frank brown.
  18. Stone Cold Locks
    18. Posted by Stone Cold Locks Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Greg - did you just really say that you are "optimistic" about something that Gary Bettman is involved with?
  19. DAVID G
    19. Posted by DAVID G Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fire Bettman now!!!!!
  20. Munkcy
    20. Posted by Munkcy Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:40 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Won't the addition of these other significant properties eventually push the NHL to the back burner on Versus? Similar to how it's assumed that if the NHL went to ESPN it wouldn't get prominently covered since it would have to compete with the NFL, MLB, NBA, etc.
  21. sjano12@...
    21. Posted by sjano12@... Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am a Center Ice subscriber and my big complaint is there are too many games televised that are not in HD. This is not 2001 here. Someone needs to do something or I will not renew next season.
  22. BANZAI
    22. Posted by BANZAI Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    No chit?
    A cryer funded homer blog with man love for alex overrated.
    And I used to think just espn was really bad about stuff like this...
  23. Dany Heatley Speedwagon
    23. Posted by Dany Heatley Speedwagon Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "Food goes in here."
  24. pamz3sons
    24. Posted by pamz3sons Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am one of the DTV subscribers dying for hockey - in my area, that is the only way to get any hockey at all. Comcast is the biggest bunch of crooks out there, I refuse to switch back to those thieves, so I ponied up my $$ for Center Ice - 15 channels of hockey, I have managed to see one game....
    What really cheese me off is the fact that the NHL played exhibition games in Europe. Really? C'mon. I am in Memphis - 8 hours form Dallas and Chicago, 3 hours from Nashville, 4 hours from St Louis and 6 hours from Atlanta. We have a CHL team and youth hockey. How awesome would it be for the fans in this area to see an NHL game? How much did it cost to go to Europe to play? I am glad to know the NHL and all these teams can afford that....said dripping with sarcasm
    It is all part of the same incredibly shortsighted marketing plan the NHL has. Makes me insane.
  25. Windy City Hockey
    25. Posted by Windy City Hockey Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Mark Kiley is lacking compared to his dad, Mike

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™