Puck Daddy - NHL

"Cabotage." It sounds like a Beastie Boys B-side, but it's actually a term used in aviation to describe the rights of an airline to fly passengers between domestic destinations in a country. It's also at the heart of a breaking story in Canada that has NHL and government officials outraged after the U.S. Department of Transportation banned Air Canada's charter fleet from flying between U.S. cities, according to the National Post:

The sticking point is an eight-year-old exemption that had allowed sports and celebrity charters to make several pit stops in American cities. Under existing open skies agreements, regular Canadian airline flights can only visit one U.S. city before returning.

Here's the deal: The D.C.-based Air Line Pilots Association initiated this action from the Obama Administration by complaining that Air Canada charter flights were transporting passengers to and from U.S. cities who weren't also transported to or from Canada, according to these findings from the U.S. Department of Transportation (.pdf). The ALPA claimed this practice was a violation of U.S. Code Title 49, which "prohibits the transportation of persons ... between points of the U.S. in a foreign civil aircraft."

For example, an NHL team would charter an Air Canada flight to a U.S. city, pick up more passengers in that city for whatever reason, and then fly to the next U.S. city where the team would play. The U.S. DOT said it found instances of that occurring after an audit of Air Canada charter programs from the Boston Bruins and the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks. The Bush Administration last year allowed the Bruins to fly Air Canada charter flights for the 2008-09 season.

Because of that audit, and because professional sports teams on the road can't predict when they'll need to add passengers to their flights, the U.S. government ruled on Monday that Air Canada's sports charter flights can fly from Canada to U.S. cities, but won't be able to fly between U.S. cities. From the ALPA:

ALPA began to work on overturning DOT's decision to permit Air Canada to carry the Bruins immediately after the department issued it last year. ALPA then teamed up with industry partners to build the argument for the DOT that the charter flights -- which at one point included 18 consecutive segments between U.S. cities over a two month period -- directly violated U.S. Code Title 49.

Needless to say, this decision has made Canadian teams and the NHL about as happy as a claustrophobic businessman who poured hot coffee on his lap while seated next to a crying child in coach. So, in summary, pretty darn upset.

From the National Post:

NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly warns the charter ban will create a complicated "patchwork" of travel that could "wreck havoc" with the oncoming hockey schedule, including early league games in Europe, as teams scramble to book flights under the new rules.

"It's potentially a very significant impact," Mr. Daly said Friday. "It's crazy and very destabilizing to our business. We're operating on a long-standing interpretation and for it to change overnight on the eve of our season is creating a huge problem for us."

Air Canada executive vice president Duncan Dee predicted the ruling will create "chaos" for teams shuttling across the border. "It's extremely messy for both American and Canadian teams," he said. It was a unilateral action imposed without consultation or Air Canada being able to defend itself. It's obvious the U.S. Department of Transportation doesn't watch hockey."

(Is this about Obama not having been to a Capitals game yet? Sheesh, he's going to meet the Pittsburgh Penguins next week; baby steps ...)

The Globe & Mail has a very good review of the issues and plenty of reaction from around the League as well:

The bans "represent a potentially big problem for our teams," said Richard Peddie, chief executive of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, which owns the Toronto Maple Leafs and Raptors.

"This is truly an unfortunate situation at the moment," said Ricky Olczyk, the Edmonton Oilers' assistant general manager. "But we remain hopeful that this matter will be resolved in an expeditious fashion."

Ross Fisher, president of Miami Air, said teams will have to find a second carrier, at an added cost, or fly back and forth across the border. Canadian teams, he noted, will be hit hardest. "You've got a lot of hockey teams up there. How many of their games are played in the States versus Canada?"

The Globe also points out that this isn't just about Air Canada:

Miami Air International, a Florida company that provides charter services for the Blue Jays and five U.S.-based NHL teams including the Pittsburgh Penguins, was told this week to cancel nearly 60 flights to Canada in September for NHL preseason games.

Naturally, this decision and the subsequent coverage of it has led to immediate anti-U.S. and anti-Obama sentiment on some hockey message boards and newspaper comment threads. It is a bit of a stunner, no question. So why is it happening?

The ALPA obviously has its agenda and loyalty to its membership. The U.S. DOT has a commitment to following the law, and federal regulations clearly show that Air Canada's charter exemptions weren't in keeping with the spirit of that law.

The most enlightening thing we've read about this dispute was in the forums for AVCanada.ca, an aviation site. The thread began back on Aug. 12, well before this became a hockey story, and the dialogue provides as least some semblance of balance as to why this "cabotage" situation is an important one for U.S. officials.

Again, it's a message board, and we have no idea who the posters are; but the sense we had after combing through the thread was that the laws are in place to prevent foreign airlines from providing local service, undercutting domestic carriers in everything from airfare to wages.

It's all just another big, bloated hockey business story in a summer that's seen too many of them. But more than that, it's another uncomfortable U.S. vs. Canada dispute -- and lord knows we've had enough of that this summer, too.

digg delicious
more

376 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Zamboni's Dad
    1. Posted by Zamboni's Dad Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:20 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Impeach Obama
  2. koala72
    2. Posted by koala72 Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:24 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    "A change that we can believe in."
  3. Josh
    3. Posted by Josh Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:30 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Gary Bettman is taking this whole "keep the Coyotes in Phoenix" thing a bit too far now.
  4. Chris
    4. Posted by Chris Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:42 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Okay so from this I gather:
    US DOT says "NO! We DON'T want you paying OUR landing and ramp fees, buying OUR fuel, or moving people who generate money for OUR economy. DON'T GIVE US MONEY!"
  5. David
    5. Posted by David Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:17 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    wow.
  6. Patrick M
    6. Posted by Patrick M Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:17 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chris - Actually what is is saying is screw Air Canada, fly American Airlines! The democrats like to open up free trade and move all our jobs oversees and somehow blame it on the republicans. Then then they do something ridiculas and petty like this so they can use it as an example of how their trying to keep jobs in America. The penguins should snub Obama next week and Canada should stop allowing US flights into Canada. I seen something like this before! It starts small with a little smack talk on Canadian beer, next thing you know we're taking row boats over to Niagra Falls to dump some trash, then it turns in to a full scale cold war between US and Canada! Didn't John Candy's behavior in Canadian Bacon teach us anything? So sad...
  7. Spidey
    7. Posted by Spidey Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:18 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Can they not just switch to a new, US-based plane? Like,
    1. Take Canadian charter
    2. Land in US
    3. If flying to a new US destination, switch planes. If going back to Canada, stay on the same plane.
    Maybe I'm missing some added layer of complexity but this doesn't seem unresolvable except maybe for Air Canada, but who really cares about them?
  8. B Jackson
    8. Posted by B Jackson Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:02 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Canadian beer sucks!
    not really. Big Rock Traditional Ale.. yum!
  9. MaTt
    9. Posted by MaTt Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:10 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    haha maybe we should ban all american teams from the nhl, then the they dont have to travel in the US, problem solved.
  10. Stephen
    10. Posted by Stephen Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:13 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Just wait until SouthWest tries to fly Calgary to Vancouver to Ottawa to Toronto.
  11. John
    11. Posted by John Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:24 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Once again an F***ing union has been a real pain in the butt
  12. bertram00
    12. Posted by bertram00 Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:27 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ant, you mean MaTt is wrong- oh, my?!?
    Following his plan of banning all American teams from the NHL( let's assume he means U.S. teams), the NHL would be a non-entity within 2 years(I'm being generous). If he actually means all Americans (which would include Canadians - see map of North America), I guess he wants to move the league to Europe.
    OK, I guess you're right - he's a MORON.
  13. Kanay D
    13. Posted by Kanay D Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:10 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    This will really piss off Canada. Why don't we just give them the Coyotes and call it even? Gary?
  14. Required
    14. Posted by Required Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:33 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    If you are a hockey fan and you voted for him, then you are an IDIOT! Get smart and don't do it again in three years when he runs for re-election! He HATES white people and everything we stand for including hockey!! Get a clue!!!
  15. Fill
    15. Posted by Fill Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:48 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    this is hilarious, but the law actually makes some kind of sense. i can handle the law, but it better not interrupt my hockey.
  16. Trevor C
    16. Posted by Trevor C Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:51 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    If BETTMAN wasn't so pro-american and such a two faced wiesel then he might actually help to resolve this issue. BUT of course, he will NOT! This fits into his master plan to have fewer canadian teams and have them all moved to non-traditional U.S. markets where they are doomed to struggle. The NHL will not be a strong & healthy business without all the problems that keep mounting up (at an increasingly rapid pace), until Bettman is completely removed from the NHL!
  17. Mike M
    17. Posted by Mike M Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:01 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let Balsillie buy the Coyotes & every NHL team a private jet. (Up grade the Red Wings) Not all people liked Micheal Moores' humor or politics. Whatever you do ,don't email the house if you disagree with their policies.
  18. Almost Lewboski
    18. Posted by Almost Lewboski Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Way to go Uncle Obama. Unions in the US only represent 12% of all workers here, and whenever they start whining the Dems pucker up and kiss there behinds.
  19. Stone Cold Locks
    19. Posted by Stone Cold Locks Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:24 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Relax everyone, the greatest commissioner in the history of Pro Sports, Gary Bettman will fix this problem......right after he fixes the Versus/Direct TV feud, straightens out the Coyotes mess, gets the league a real TV contract.....and.......never mind.
  20. HAMMER
    20. Posted by HAMMER Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:52 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I guess Obama's making The U.S. more likable only applies to countries like North Korea , Iran and Iraq
  21. leafs rock
    21. Posted by leafs rock Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:05 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Considering out of the 30 teams there are only 6 Canadian teams that need to travel throughout the US on a regular basis this is a smart move by the US to once again push down the Canadian market. I suggest our teams just buy their own planes and not use commercial airlines ...... hmmmmm who would be losing in end??????? USA totally Mr DUMASS
  22. jc
    22. Posted by jc Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @16 You're a f*cking retard.
  23. Bubbabanjo
    23. Posted by Bubbabanjo Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:42 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    ehhhhhhhhhhhhh rich guy mud fight...who cares????

Puck Daddy

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Greg Wyshynski

Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Puck Daddy Recent Readers

Watch Live Hockey Online with GameCenter Live™