Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:48 am EDT

It was just one summer ago when the hockey media hung on to every word coming out of either Mats Sundin(notes) or his agent, J.P. Barry's mouth about the star center's future. There was the August 1st deadline when Sundin was supposed to make his final decision. That turned into a "soft deadline" and no decision was made of course. Then, Sportsnet's Nick Kypreos flew all the way to Sweden to talk to Mats and try and get the inside scoop. That was fruitless, of course. It wasn't until mid-December when Sundin finally decided to sign with the Vancouver Canucks in a pro-rated one-year deal.
Today, Sundin sits in the same position he did a year ago: a man without a team still deciding on his future. The big Swede has said he will make his decision at the end of July (Hey, just like last year!) as he's getting married in August and would like nothing to distract him from that moment in his life. The big difference from a year ago? The lack of media coverage. Maybe writers and talk radio hosts learned their lesson last summer when trying to speculate and press Sundin to make a decision? Maybe, unlike a year ago, they're strongly leaning towards the fact that Mats will retire into the sunset?
And maybe they just don't care anymore?
The Sundin coverage from a year ago got to the point where it became unbearable. Granted, from mid-July until training camps begin in September, there's not much to discuss, but it almost made the current Michael Jackson coverage seem tame.
Whatever Sundin's decision, Vancouver Canucks general manager Mike Gillis won't be waiting for a decision this time around. For Mats to return to the Canucks, he would have to take less than the $5.36 million he made for half a season and if his play in the playoffs was any factor in his decision this year, as the Vancouver Province's Jim Jamieson writes, Sundin could believe he's able to do it for one more season:
"But the reality is that bringing Sundin back would be workable only under two conditions: 1) That Sundin makes up his mind asap whether he is going to continue his NHL career so he can report the first day of training camp in top shape; and 2) He agrees to sign for much less, say, in the $4 million range.
There will be those who'll suggest signing Sundin last season was a mistake. Certainly, his scoring numbers were a disappointment. He finished the regular season with nine goals and 28 points in 41 games. This included scoring just three times in the final 29 games.
More disconcerting, Sundin never really seemed to find his skating legs as he attempted to play himself into game shape.
But Sundin's play came on in the final month of the season and despite a knee injury that forced him to miss the final two games of the Canucks' first round series with St. Louis, Sundin was one of Vancouver's better players against Chicago, with four points (2-2) in the last two games and seven (2-5) in the six game series."
Should Sundin actually make his decision like he plans at the end of the month, if he does comeback, a full training camp would allow him to begin the season with his skating legs and be a productive component to whatever team he ends up with.
Should Sundin finally decide to call it a career, he'll find himself sitting next to Joe Sakic(notes) in three years at the Hockey Hall of Fame inductions and the National Hockey League (and the legendary NHL '94 video game) will have lost another great ambassador on the ice.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Detroit 3, Montreal 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Dallas 5, New Jersey 3 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Chicago 5, Edmonton 2 (Nov. 21)
Posted Nov 20 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
62 Comments
1 - 25 of 62
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Last year, he was the long-time captain and franchise player of the team with the largest fan base. This year, he's at best a second liner from a mid-market team.
And of course, last year there were two potential storylines: either the Leafs resigned Mats even though they were rebuilding, or they let him walk away after all those years. Either way, the media could write their "oh those dumb Maple Leafs" articles that they love so much. Everybody wins.
This year, there's no drama. No real intrigue. Just a veteran guy who hopefully makes his mind up before he becomes a punch line.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
sather needs a #1 pivot, and he's just the guy to overpay for him
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Nah in all seriousness Mats is better than Zubrus
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Are you kidding me?
He had ONE season with more than 100 points (92-93), and the rest of his season point totals are pedestrian (in the 70-80 point range).
With the notable exception of Gordy Howe (who NEVER scored more than 100 points in a season), when did the Hall of Fame open its doors to guys who NEVER won the Stanley Cup and who were merely "better than average" offensive talents?
Sundin was NEVER even in the "top 3 players in the game" discussion throughout his entire career. What a joke!
Report Abuse
Any GM who signs him for more than about $1.5M and expects anything more than a faceoff and PP guy will be disappointed.
Career loser who spent his team playing on loser squads.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
umm....yeah.....you might want to double check that....
Two other questions:
1) What franchise has the most Hall of Famers?
2) Who is the ALL TIME leading scorer of said franchise?
Leahy is wrong. In three years the eligible pool will increase by Markus Naslund, Joe Sakic, Sergei Federov and possibly Chris Chelios. Claude Lemieux will also be eligible as will Peter Forsberg (assuming he officially retires). Only four get in (provided all four are named by 75 % of the voters). He'll get in, but the first ballot? Not a guarantee by any means. I would put Sundin ahead of Naslund although Markus does have three First All Star team selections and a Lester B Pearson award (MVP as voted by his peers in 2003). Sundin has two Second All Star team selections plus the Messier Leadership award. He will absolutely get in Michael, the following achievements aren't exactly "merely better than average" :
Currently holds the NHL record for most regular season overtime goals (15)
Ranked 20th all time in career goals (564) (Shared with Joe Nieuwendyk)
Ranked 32nd all time in career assists (785)
Ranked 25th all time in career points (1349)
First European hockey player to be drafted first overall in the NHL Entry Draft (1989 by the Quebec Nordiques)
Longest serving European captain of an NHL franchise in league history
First Swedish player to reach the 500 goal milestone
Most career games, points, goals and assists by a Swedish hockey player
Fastest overtime goal (6 seconds)
Only Swedish player to reach 1000 points
Thanks for playing.
Report Abuse
Don't get me wrong, they're good players, but not elite.
Like I said (and I laughed aloud at the "thanks for playing!" bit), at no point during his career was Mats Sundin in the "Top THREE (emphasis on THREE) Players in the League" discussion.
You're arguing that someon who wasn't even in the conversation for the best player, at any point, during his career should be stamped for the Hall of Fame?
The points you brought up are downright comical:
1) What Franchise has the most Hall of Famers? (....so Sundin should make it because he's a Maple Leaf? By that same logic, Tomas Kaberle is a Hall of Famer)
2) He's the career scoring leader for the Maple Leafs. Rick Nash is going to retire the points leader for the Columbus Bluejackets. You're right, Rick Nash is a Hall of Famer. Brilliant, irrevocable logic.
3) Most regular season overtime goals. What a stat. Clearly, this makes up for his lack of overall production ("He scores big goals in the regular season OT's!" What a clutch, clutch performer. I'm sorry, how many Stanley Cups did Mr. Clutch win? Oh, that's right- ZERO.
He was the first European Player to be drafted first overall? While we're attaching Hall of Fame significance to relatively insignificant details, Jimmy Paek (South Korea) scored in the 1991 Stanley Cup Finals. That man deserves a bust in Toronto!
He was the longest serving European Captain of an NHL franchise? I guess this also means he is the Longest Serving European Captain of an NHL Franchise to never reach the NHL Finals, let alone win the Stanley Cup, too. Which distinction carries more weight?
Most goals, assists, and point for a Swedish player...
Really, I'm glad the NHL Hall of Fame bases who gets in off of where they're from. I've already made a "convincing" argument for Jim Paek, so let's include Olaf Kolzig in the Hall of Fame. I mean, Olaf Kolzig was born in South Africa, and is one of only 4 goalies to EVER play a scoreless period in net during the NHL All-Star Game. Olaf also backstopped the Washington Capitals to the Stanley Cup Finals, a round of the Playoffs "Mr. Leadership" never quite managed to achieve.
I'm glad that you're a Maple Leaf Homer, but face it, Mats Sundin is "very good hockey player," which is nothing to be ashamed of. He should NEVER make the Hall of Fame.
And yes, thank you for letting me stomp you while playing.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Listen, Michael, he's going to make it into the Hall of Fame. I'm not saying he should or he shouldn't but I would bet you any amount of money that he will get in.
Induction requires a certain amount (percentage) of votes to get in. The fact that Mats is the longest serving captain (in recent history) of the Maple Leafs as well as their all-time leader in goals and points will absolutely help him. The HOF is in Toronto and the media coverage Sundin received by being the leader of the Leafs for a decade elevates his status. I'm not saying it should, I'm saying it does.
You are quite clearly unaware of the fact that the HOF has, in recent years, made a concerted effort to seem less biased towards Canadians. They HOF committee would LOVE to have another Swede inducted (hmm...what other Swede is inducted Michael? If you said Borje Salming, you're right! Was he ever considered an elite defenceman? Not really. He was, however, a Leaf. He was also the first Swedish player to play regularly in the NHL, make an All Star team and have an significant impact). You may have noticed in my first post that I noted that Mats Sundin is also "the first...." in many of the points I made. That is why I did so. Comparing someone like Sundin to Jim Paek is not useful Michael. Jim Paek did not score over 1300 points did he? Did he lead his team in scoring every year for a decade (except one, where Mogilny beat him by 7 points).
The argument about being mentioned in the top three is also weak. Space prevents me listing all the players but let's start with the following :
Jacques Lemaire
Dave Keon
Darryl Sittler
Bill Barber
Steve Shutt
Bob Gainey
Lanny MacDonald
Michel Goulet
Joe Mullen
Mike Gartner
Bernie Federko
Glenn Anderson
Igor Larionov
Not a whole bunch of Hart Finalists there. In fact, not even that many All Star team berths (BTW, I mean end of season first and second teams, not All Star game participation). Essentially the Hart finalists are considered to be the top THREE players in the league, correct. You feel that this is an important consideration for HOF induction. Based on the list above, is it really?
How many cups did Darryl Sittler win? How long was Sittler captain of Toronto? How many points does Sittler have? The fact that Sittler was beloved by Toronto helped his cause without a doubt. Also, some records, although insignificant to you, do hold voters attention. For example, Sittler still holds the record for points in single game.
Oh, another thing Michael, I'm sure you are well aware that international achievements are also taken into consideration. Correct if I'm wrong but I do not think Olaf Kolzig's nor Jimmy Paek's resume looks anything like this :
1992 World Championships (gold medal)
1994 World Championships (bronze medal)
1996 World Cup of Hockey
1998 World Championships (gold medal)
1998 Winter Olympics
2001 World Championships
2002 Winter Olympics
2003 World Championships (silver medal)
2004 World Cup of Hockey
2006 Winter Olympics (gold medal)
I can keep going all night but I honestly do not think you will respond.
You did not stomp anyone Michael. I actually was not trying to be a dick with the "thanks for playing", it was more of a cocky jab on my part. Your anti-Sundin bias seemed to be more of an anti-Leafs bias so I was just joking around. I am not a Leafs fan AT ALL but I am not stupid. Mats will get the nod. If you would like to continue I have numerous precedents that I can reference as to why Sundin will get in. I find personal insults given behind the safety of a computer screen rather gutless and pathetic so if that is how the "thanks for playing" was perceived I am sorry. I can intelligently and effectively debate this topic without going down that road (as I'm sure you can, if you want to). I'm just getting warmed up Michael. Your serve....
Also, Gordie Howe scored 103 points in 1968.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 62