PITTSBURGH (AP)—No matter how you measure it, the Cleveland Browns can’t beat the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Ben Roethlisberger(notes) threw two touchdown passes in an increasingly wide-open Pittsburgh offense and the Steelers benefited from a debatable first-down measurement to beat the rival Browns 27-14 on Sunday, their 12th consecutive victory against their oldest rival.
Roethlisberger, second in the league in passing and on pace for what would easily be his best statistical season, was 23 of 35 for 417 yards in his second career 400-yard game. Hines Ward(notes) made eight catches for 159 yards and a touchdown, Santonio Holmes(notes) had five for 104 and tight end Heath Miller(notes) caught his fourth TD pass in three games.
“He’s in total command of the offense,” coach Mike Tomlin said of Roethlisberger, who has thrown for 1,887 yards and 10 touchdowns in six games. “It’s fun to watch.”
Even if all the turnovers weren’t—four for each team, including two apiece in a span of 1:25 late in the third quarter.
Pittsburgh outgained Cleveland 543-197, yet the Steelers led only 17-14 in the third quarter. And they might not have had that lead if they hadn’t been given a first down after Roethlisberger looked to be stopped inches short on a fourth-down sneak from Cleveland’s 14 late in the second quarter.
TV replays appeared to show the ball short of the stick on a play in which Roethlisberger tried to lure Cleveland offside before slamming headfirst into the middle of the defense. As the Browns players yelled and began running off the field, referee Walt Anderson surprised both teams by signaling first down.
“It was a close play—and we got lucky,” Roethlisberger said.
“I saw all the Cleveland guys arguing and yelling, so it was, well, the referee knows the rules better than I do,” tackle Max Starks(notes) said. “If he says first down, it’s a first down.”
Even if the Browns, obviously, didn’t think it was.
“He made the call; you have to live with it,” linebacker David Bowens(notes) said. “I don’t know if there was (an explanation). He just said first down and that’s it.”
Anderson explained the TV angle might have been deceptive.
“If you shot that angle from the other side, it might actually look like it’s further in advance of the stake of what it was,” said Anderson, who was certain the call was correct.
Roethlisberger’s apparent 13-yard TD pass to Ward two plays later was overturned on replay because the ball came out of Ward’s hands as he rolled out of bounds, and Pittsburgh settled for the field goal.
Because of the first-down ruling, the Browns trailed 17-14 instead of being tied after driving for only their fourth touchdown on offense in 12 games— they’ve lost 11—on Derek Anderson’s(notes) 1-yard pass to Lawrence Vickers(notes) early in the third quarter.
Anderson was 9 of 24 for 122 yards.
“We’re not trying to lose every time we go out here,” Anderson said, referring to Cleveland’s 1-9 record in Heinz Field. “We put tons of hours in and … it’s frustrating. Every single week, it’s frustrating.”
The Steelers, winning their third in a row, made it 24-14 when Roethlisberger hit Ward for 45 yards and Mike Wallace(notes) for 21 ahead of Rashard Mendenhall’s(notes) 2-yard touchdown run.
“I think we haven’t played our best ball yet and that’s pretty comforting,” Miller said. “We’ve gotten a few wins here without playing our best.”
The Browns’ other score came on Joshua Cribbs’(notes) 98-yard kickoff return late in the second quarter that followed Roethlisberger’s touchdown passes of 8 yards to Miller and 52 to Ward. Cribbs ran untouched along the Steelers’ sideline for his club-record eighth kick return score, six on kickoff returns, and his third against the Steelers.
“I heard `Return one for me’ from 1,000 fans back home in Cleveland and I got up for this game,” Cribbs said.
After the flurry of turnovers, Reed kicked a 39-yard field goal, and the Browns gave the ball back yet again—their fourth turnover and 32nd in 12 games — when Anderson was intercepted by Ryan Clark(notes).
Cribbs also was intercepted, by Troy Polamalu(notes), out of the wildcat formation during the first half.
Notes: The Steelers hadn’t produced 500 yards in 50 games—while beating Cleveland 27-7 in 2006. … The Steelers have won 18 of 19 against the Browns, counting a playoff game. … Polamalu, who missed four games with a torn left knee ligament, discarded his protective brace after the pregame warmups. … Browns LB Kamerion Wimbley(notes) (flu-like symptoms) did not play after having a sack in three consecutive games. LB D’Qwell Jackson(notes) left in the second half with an unspecified shoulder injury. … Roethlisberger threw for 433 yards during a 31-20 loss to Denver in 2006.
Head to Head - Week 6
| Team | Total Yds | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | First Downs | 3rdD% | Pen./Yds | Turnovers | Time of Poss. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland | 197 | 106 | 91 | 12 | 38.5% | 4/45 | 4 | 23:14 |
| Pittsburgh | 543 | 403 | 140 | 28 | 36.4% | 4/30 | 4 | 36:46 |

Dawgs By Nature
Behind the Steel Curtain
273 Comments
1 - 25 of 273
Report Abuse
That's total crap. In reality, when one play is changed, the whole dynamic of a game can be changed. Both teams might play differently. For example, an offense might play more aggressively because they are well behind, and a defense may play more loosely because they have a big lead. Dallas fans have whined that if Jackie Smith hadn't dropped a sure TD in SB13, then the final score would have been 38-35 instead of 35-31. But Pittsburgh had a 35-17 lead with 4 minutes to play. They played with an 18-point lead with 4 minutes left. If it had been an 11-point lead, they would have played differently. So Smith dropping that pass may have changed the game at that point, but you can't just tack it on the final result and assume evrything else goes unchanged. Unless the play in question is the final play of the game or the deciding play, like in the tuck rule game. In that game Brady's fumble gives Oakland the ball with the lead with little time left and it's game over.
Report Abuse
Go Vikings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
come back when you can play with the big boys. brownie fans, i'd pray for them to relocate the team AGAIN so you can rid yourself of the embarrassment!
Report Abuse
And if Marcus is on this thread, yes, go ahead and tell me what a BQ lover I am and how great DA really is, regardless of stats.
Report Abuse
The real ball -slapper here is when somene notes, "my" or "our" team. Really now? REALLY?
You have an ownership stake/percentage in any of these teams?
Hell, ownership would not have anything to do with you uneducated, puss-gutted, untalented, ball-scratchin',
fart-in-the-wife's face knuckleheads. In fact, they keep on laughing all the way to the bank with your blue-collar nickles! LMAO at the short-bus sports fan! =D
Report Abuse
The real ball -slapper here is when somene notes, "my" or "our" team. Really now? REALLY?
You have an ownership stake/percentage in any of these teams?
Hell, ownership would not have anything to do with you uneducated, puss-gutted, untalented, ball-scratchin',
fart-in-the-wife's face knuckleheads. In fact, they keep on laughing all the way to the bank with your blue-collar nickles! LMAO at the short-bus sports fan! =D
Report Abuse
Go Vikings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
It was the camera angle. If you look (I taped it and looked about ten times), the flag stick and ball are not lined up right at each other. If you were to approach it from the other side (around the goal line, not the fifty), you would see that the ball is over by about two inches. But, they did not show that angle. They probably do not have that angle, as the players are in the way to get a good shot. The refs have to move the players back to get any angle at all for the camera. It did look short on TV, but was not. It was the angle.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
mjhst67, I dunno... looked to me like the TV camera might've been at an angle from further upfield, rather than straight down the line (which might've made it appear that there was space between the ball & the marker when there might not've been), but who knows... all I know is that the Browns D coordinator probably had a better look, and he sure was droppin' some f-bombs on the refs... I'm thiking that the subsequent ruling to take away the Ward TD might've been a "make-up" call...
Well, someday, Cleveland will have a good enough team that blown calls will matter...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'd love to see another Patriots Steelers game.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I think they oughtta adjust the rule to make it clearly state that nothing that happens once a player has gone off the field-of-play matters. Then, all the refs would have to do is decide WHETHER a player, WHEN he loses control of the ball, is off the field-of-play, i.e., over the sideline or end-line boundary (which seems like it'd usually be a cleaner/easier/ more objective video determination).
As it now stands, you've got the refs trying to make a more subjective judgement call re: how far a play goes on AFTER a player has left the in-bounds playing field until the actual "end of the play" [whenever he stops rolling, or slips on a hot-dog-wrapper & falls, or whatever] -- implying that a play can somehow continue after the player has gone out of bounds, which seems sort of strange...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Pittsburgh has won the most Championships in the NFL....any questions?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
"Is there guidance as to how many rolls must a player complete while out-of-bounds, and/or how far from the field of play must the player be, before he can relinquish the ball without having the touchdown overturned?" [I forgot to type "overturned"]
and should've said "clean" up, not "cean" at the end. Sorry, folks.
Report Abuse
if there is betting going on in the NFL it starts with Pitt..
1 - 25 of 273