Gov. signs LA-area football stadium waiver bill
INDUSTRY, Calif. (AP)—Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Thursday he has signed a bill allowing the construction of a 75,000-seat stadium that developers hope will lure an NFL team back to the Los Angeles area.
Schwarzenegger said he signed the environmental exemption bill last week but saved the announcement for a news conference in Industry, where the stadium would be built about 15 miles east of Los Angeles.
The bill nullifies a lawsuit filed by residents in nearby Walnut over the project’s environmental impact.
Schwarzenegger called the lawsuit frivolous before a crowd of union members wearing hardhats. Across the street, a dozen protesters from Walnut and other nearby communities held signs saying “No Stadium.”
“This is the best kind of action state government can create—action that cuts red tape, generates jobs, is environmentally friendly and brings a continued economic boost to California,” Schwarzenegger said.
The governor spoke on the edge of the hilly 600-acre site where the stadium is planned by developer Majestic Realty Co., which helped develop Staples Center, the downtown Los Angeles home of the NBA’s Lakers and Clippers and the NHL’s Kings.
Renderings of the $800 million venue show sleek glass skyboxes cantilevered over regular seating. The stadium would be bordered by mid-rise buildings with an orthopedic hospital, movie theaters and shops to be built during a later phase of development.
Majestic chief executive Ed Roski, a billionaire, has vowed to build the stadium without any public support beyond the $150 million bond measure by Industry to pay for infrastructure improvements, which the developers plan to repay through ticket sales and parking fees.
Majestic has targeted seven teams it plans to approach after the Super Bowl in February about move to the Los Angeles area: the Buffalo Bills, Jacksonville Jaguars, Minnesota Vikings, St. Louis Rams, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers.
The firm has said the teams are in stadiums that are either too small or can’t be updated with luxury box seats or other revenue sources an NFL club needs to thrive.
Roski said he’s prepared to break ground as soon as a team is locked in and that he’s confident that he can raise the $800 million needed for the stadium despite tight credit markets.
“We don’t feel at this time that it’s going to be a challenge,” he said.
Mark Ganis, president of Chicago-based consultancy SportsCorp, said it will be a struggle for a new team in the region to earn enough revenue to pay the high interest banks are demanding for construction loans.
The firm would also likely have to take on debt to buy and move a team to the region, said Ganis, whose firm helped develop the new Yankee Stadium and other sports venues.
“In order to privately finance and operate a new stadium, it would have to generate more in-stadium revenue than virtually any team currently existing in the NFL,” Ganis said. “That is a monumental task.”
Without guarantees that the team could bring in that revenue, the NFL would be unlikely to approve a move, Ganis said.
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said the league wants to see a team back in the Los Angeles area under circumstances that make sense for the league and the community hosting a team, but declined to specify what those circumstances are.
He said the league was aware of the environmental exemption’s passage, but wasn’t actively supporting any specific proposals.
Majestic’s proposal for a stadium in Industry, a 12-square-mile maze of warehouses, factories, strip malls and topless bars, has gone farther than any previous efforts to bring pro football back to the nation’s second-biggest market since the Rams and Raiders left in 1994.
Roski was previously among the backers of a plan to renovate the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum for an expansion team. But the new team went to a Houston after the Los Angeles interests were outbid by some $150 million.
Subsequent efforts to renovate the Coliseum and Rose Bowl, and build new stadiums in cities such as Carson and Anaheim were largely thwarted by community opposition and a reluctance to sweeten the deal for the NFL with public funding.
State legislators approved the current plan amid lobbying by Majestic and labor union officials, who argued that the venue’s construction and operation would bring jobs to the region suffering from high unemployment.
Backers said the stadium would create over 18,000 jobs and generate over $320 million in salaries for residents of the region.
Los Angeles County Federation of Labor head Maria Elena Durazo said Majestic has guaranteed that the parking lot attendants, concession stand workers and other stadium employees would be paid middle-class wages.
“This is true economic development,” Durazo said. “It’s going to benefit everyone in our community.”
But Rod Faccio, a protester from Walnut, said he didn’t see the benefit to his community, which he feared would now be besieged by drunk drivers on game days and other hazards.
He condemned legislators for letting the project go forward without the environmental study that some stadium critics were demanding.
“That’s the principal focus: what is the impact going to be?” said Faccio, 46. “Now we’re never going to know.”

Buffalo Rumblings
Big Cat Country
Daily Norseman
649 Comments
1 - 25 of 649
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Is that all it takes to be middle-class these days. Are those jobs middle-class wage worthy?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Lay off the drugs...
Are you quoting out of a collection of Nostrodomus writings and applying that to the NFL...? or what...?
Report Abuse
Here's the final word;
No new team should move into LA or any other part of California -ever.
All current professional sports teams (not including soccer
Report Abuse
The ONLY reason we do not have the NFL in L.A. today is because of the rotten ownership of the Rams and Raiders. The Rams sold out for years in L.A. and would have been just fine in Anaheim if the late Georgia Rosenbloom Frontiere actually gave a damn and spent some money on the team instead of on herself. When St. Louis rolled up two or three armored cars full of cash, of course, she left. Al Davis has just plain lost it, but he was actually lied to, and instead of going to Anaheim when the Rams left, which would have made all of the sense in the world, he instead threw a tantrum and went back to Oakland. He and his team should stay there.
Here's what is actually going to happen, people, so learn to accept it. The Rams will return and the Jaguars will be joining them. Because L.A. is a two-team market, and the NFL wants both the NFC and the AFC to have a team here. If the Jaguars get stuck in Jacksonville, then it will be the Bills, only because Ralph Wilson's family apparently does not want to continue on after he dies.
While Toronto would be a good place for an NFL team, it would kill the CFL. The NFL would have to buy the entire CFL just to have a team in Toronto, and what would they do with the remaining teams? Besides, the NFL Players Association wants the CFL to continue so that there is an alternate place for players who can't make it in the NFL, or get suspended from the NFL for bad behavior. So, the CFL has to survive for those reasons alone, at least in the view of the NFL.
It makes no sense for the 49ers, Chargers, or Raiders to move there, and still help the state economy. Even Schwarzenegger can figure that one out, so it will be teams from other states. Besides, the Chargers really seem to want to stay in San Diego, at least according to their spokesman, and the 49ers would NEVER move to L.A. That's like the Giants moving here, or the Dodgers moving there. Hell would freeze over. The Raiders will probably try to come back, but if they do, Al Davis must be made to sell the team by the rest of the league.
Still, after being fooled and led on for 15-plus years now, I will believe the stadium gets built when the construction crews arrive in Industry. But when the stadium is done, there will be TWO teams playing there.
And for the East Coast fools out there who think they run the world, think again. Without California acting as ANY candidate's ATM from EITHER party, no one gets elected to serve in DC. We produce the TV and movies you watch, we create the technology you use, and all your women wish they could be California Girls!
Just because we have to start our playoff games 3 hours early to appease you does not mean that you all always do not die 3 hours earlier than you should!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Al Davis has exposed himself as the money grubbing, no commitment whore that he is. He would probably love to come running back to his old lover because we would have the money he craves.
L.A. would benefit greatly from a new stadium.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
They are undersold and underappreciated in Jacksonville.
www.averagejoefootballfan.blogspot.com
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Nah, screw that, we gotta save the environment!!!! (Sarcasm)
I like the environment as much as the next person, but really, the tree huggers can go bite on this one.
Jacksonville would seem like a good fit for LA, seeing as how no one really cares about them in Florida...that and the fact that I'm sure a lot of Floridians will be more than happy to see the Dolphins as opposed to an undersold Jags TV blackout.
As for the drunkeness, what 32 other cities don't have this problem? It gets dealt with (security jobs, maybe more traffic cops....are the environmentalists so stuck up in their self-important ways that they can't see the multiple benefits here? Good Lord!)
Report Abuse
A stadium results in immeiate ecomonic boost. Thousands of jobs for construction workers, millions of dollars in raw material purchase from state businesses. Then in the future it results in jobs for stadium employees as well as the surrounding businesses they are intending to develop. . . look up patriot place at gillette stadium . . .
The real risk here is if the team can get support from surrounding area . . . if they don't then everybody will lose. . . but I think the Gov and the legislature are being more positive and optimistic at this time with this initiative.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 649