Limbaugh already down 1 vote in bid to buy Rams
BOSTON (AP)—Rush Limbaugh’s bid to buy the St. Louis Rams ran into opposition within the NFL on Tuesday, when Colts owner Jim Irsay vowed to vote against him and commissioner Roger Goodell said the conservative commentator’s “divisive” comments would not be tolerated from any NFL insider.
“I, myself, couldn’t even consider voting for him,” Irsay said at an owners meetings. “When there are comments that have been made that are inappropriate, incendiary and insensitive … our words do damage, and it’s something that we don’t need.”
Limbaugh has long been a hero of conservatives and villain to the left, thriving on his place in the political spectrum while establishing himself as one of the most successful broadcasters in history. But the NFL tries to avoid controversy, as Limbaugh learned in 2003 when he was forced to resign from ESPN’s Sunday night football broadcast after saying of Philadelphia’s Donovan McNabb(notes): “I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.”
Goodell repeatedly distanced the league from Limbaugh’s statements on Tuesday, calling them “polarizing comments that we don’t think reflect accurately on the NFL or our players.”
“I have said many times before that we are all held to a higher standard here,” the commissioner said. “I think divisive comments are not what the NFL is all about. I would not want to see those kind of comments from people who are in a responsible position within the NFL. No. Absolutely not.”
According to transcripts posted on his Web site, in 2007 Limbaugh also said: “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.” That comment, and others, resurfaced this month when he revealed he is teaming with St. Louis Blues owner Dave Checketts to bid on the Rams.
In an e-mail to The Associated Press, Limbaugh said he was forced to respond because “the totally made-up and fabricated quotes attributed to me in recent media reports are outrageous and slanderous.” He also noted that he would be a minority owner in the prospective group, adding he is from Missouri and was saddened when the Cardinals left for Arizona.
“I am happy to be involved in an effort to keep the Rams in St. Louis. I love the National Football League, I eagerly discuss it and promote it and I greatly admire the men who play in the league. They are the best at what they do,” he wrote. “It is regrettable that something I have dreamed about for years has taken this course. But the fight is worth it to me. I love the National Football League.”
The Rams updated the league on their potential sale on Tuesday but specific bidders were not discussed, Goodell said.
“They’re not certain they are even sellers,” New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch said, adding that he expected a decision by the end of the season. “We can’t speculate on potential owners because they have not brought up any names to put before ownership. It’s out there, but without confirmation from the Rams or the Rosenbloom family, frankly, we don’t know who the potential buyers are.”
Patriots owner Robert Kraft referred questions about Limbaugh to the commissioner. Texans owner Bob McNair said anyone who meets the “normal criteria” is a candidate to own a team.
“But our vetting process is very thorough,” he said.
Prominent blacks are already lining up against Limbaugh, including the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. NFL Players Association head DeMaurice Smith, who is black, urged players to speak out against Limbaugh’s bid, and several have already said they would not play for his team.
Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank echoed Goodell’s comments and noted that the league and the union had a similar stance. Blank also said he wouldn’t expect Limbaugh, if the deal went through, to tone down his lucrative radio show to avoid running afoul of the league.
“I find that highly unlikely,” he said.
Prospective owners must be approved by 24 of the league’s 32 teams. Irsay is the first owner who has stated unequivocally he would reject Limbaugh because he made a habit of “demonizing individuals.”
“I met Rush only once. He seemed like a nice guy to me and all those kind of things,” Irsay said. “It’s bigger than the NFL. As a nation, and as a world, we’ve got to watch our words and our thoughts. They can do damage.”
Associated Press writer Brian Skoloff contributed to this story from West Palm Beach, Fla.

1234 Comments
1 - 25 of 1234
Report Abuse
its always blame the white man... then the white man tries to defend himself, and then the black man talks about how white women want him. its a continual cycle of american ignorance...
to the white man... slavery was wrong but that was your ancestors that did that not you, dont feel bad and dont act like youre superior
to the black man... you arent always the best at fighting, not everyone fears you, and no, not all white, latin, asian women want you...
Report Abuse
You said:
"By the way, before you go hating on whitey, keep in mind for all the wrongs that whites have done...it took White people to free Blacks. If it wasn't for White people, we would still have slavery!!!"
Crediting white people for freeing blacks would be like crediting the Nazis for not exterminating all the Jews. You don't credit the perpetrator for ceasing their wrongdoing.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Your explanation in #1207 is accepted. But I do feel the need to tread on eggshells regarding the nature of wording questions. Not because I want to, it's because I open the racially charged floodgates using just slightly wrong wording. I have gotten myself into trouble many times using one innocent word that could have been understood in a few different ways. For example: Earlier in this blog, I alluded to the fact white atheletes tend to dominate certain sports I.E. hockey, skiing, surfing, cycling, motorsports, the X-games. I was using the word "dominate" to refer to the sheer numbers of notable atheletes competing at the highest level. I was not referring to a black athelete's inability to excel given the opportunity! Unfortunately, the vast majority of the comments received were in response to definition "B" of the word "dominate" as opposed to "A". I'd say the numbers of top atheletes in these sports is blatantly obvious but pointing it out tends to be "salt" in the open wound of racism! As a country boy (an educated one) from Maine, It's hard for me to understand that.
I'm greatful for every comment because I've learned something from them ALL...... Including the ones that were downright ignorant. I must admit my gratitude is primarily aimed at those who were able to answer the questions directly without needing to diagnose why I was asking the question.
One question I asked was as follows....... Is it wrong to ask why world class black atheletes are faster and can leap higher?
I blogger named Danny did exactly what I asked and therefore, I learned thje most...... He answered the question first, then followed up with a brilliant explanation. He said "Nope... it's not! however, (the rest of this is copy / pasted) **For so long, those things have been said not as a compliment but, as a "slight" in lieu of recognizing the African-American athlete for being equally as "intelligent" as his white counterparts. I've tried to open my mind to such comments but, it is still difficult because of the lingering memories of social biases and the subliminal feelings of being made to feel inferior. That would lower the threshhold of tolerance of anyone and you would tend to be more sensitive to such comments henceforth. "Defensive" would be a good characterization".**
From his picture, it appears Danny is a thirty something, black male. As result, I value that comment significantly and it has unique value.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If they do not allow Rush to become an owner based on his views and discussions from his days at ESPN or his radio show, then the NFL is to be boycotted.
I am sick and tired of these racist who hide behind the vail of "Victim". Yes, there is racism in America...guess what there is racism throughout the world. And no, it is not ONLY Whites hating blacks...but actually we find that racism occurs within all ethnic backgrounds.
Rush is not a racist. He is a man with conservative values. This racist label is simply a trick from those who hate conservative progress and will do anything they can to shut down conservatives.
I once believed that the Colts were a class organization, but for Irsay to make the comments of hate that he has made is very disheartening. His public opinion is about as divisive as I've heard and from this NFL fan, I will no longer watch a single Colts game the remainder of this year.
What the freak has happened to America? We used to be able to think for ourselves, now we have radical racists telling America what it should do or not do, think or not think...I'm talkin about Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the likes.
With each passing day, we find that Rush's statements on ESPN ring truer and truer, but for some reason the White Guilt in this nation is so extreme that hardly anyone wants to admit it.
By the way, before you go hating on whitey, keep in mind for all the wrongs that whites have done...it took White people to free Blacks. If it wasn't for White people, we would still have slavery!!! How about we have a heritage month on the calendar to celebrate those who fought for the rights of ALL Men and Women?
Again, there are true racist in this nation...we have Black Racists and White Racists...there no room for either of them and it's about freakin time we start calling them out!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How many players in the NFL have said the N word does that make them a racist?
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones, I hope this comes back on the owners
big time, I know i wont be going to any games
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
With that said, I don't think anybody is infringing on anybody's rights here. Rush is free to put together a plan to buy the Rams. Likewise, the Rams are free to accept whatever bid they want, and the owners are, in turn, free to accept or reject that plan according to the by-laws they have set up as a corperation. Personally, I agree with the minority in this situation and believe Rush's legal input as a partial owner will miniscule and not even noteworthy after the first six months. So what's the big deal?
Despite my opinion, the owners are savvy business people. They are going to consider the best interests of this league and their own franchises before they let anybody own a team. The talk about giving Vick a chance as well as giving announcers a chance carries far less wieght than giving a potential owner a shot.
This is the deal........ If a pro sports league or a franchise has a problem with a coach or a player they can cut him, suspend him or in some situation give him a lifetime ban (Pete Rose). If they have a problem with an announcer or a reporter, they fire them or ban them. If they have a problem with another owner, they suffer through it! The process of ousting another owner is a process that takes YEARS of legal red tape and they have every right to be very choosey if they wish.
1 - 25 of 1234