Goodell expects multiple NFL games in Britain soon

  • Print

LONDON (AP)—NFL commissioner Roger Goodell expects the league to start playing multiple regular-season games in Britain in the next few years—an expansion that could lead to putting a franchise in London.

Goodell said Friday that “every indicator” shows the British market can support more games and that having a franchise here is of “tremendous interest” to the league. But he stopped short of giving a timeline for expanding the NFL’s overseas presence.

“The interest and the enthusiasm for our game continues to grow, and we want to feed that,” Goodell said. “We want to respond to that by hopefully bringing more to the UK.”

Goodell spoke at a sports conference Friday ahead of Sunday’s game between the New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Wembley Stadium. It’s the third year in a row the NFL is staging a regular-season game in London, and the league is now looking into playing at least two games a year in Britain, he said. Aside from London, Manchester and Glasgow, Scotland, are being looked at as potential venues.

“I expect that sometime in the next couple of years, we could be playing multiple games here,” Goodell said. “If we brought more than one game here, and it continues to have the same kind of enthusiasm and growth of interest, I think that is about as good of an indicator you can get that it could successfully support a franchise. And that’s what we’re looking at.”

Staging a Super Bowl abroad, however, “is not something that is under active consideration,” Goodell said.

The league is considering expanding the regular season to 17 or 18 games, with a possibility for every team to play one game abroad. Patriots owner Robert Kraft said if the league wants more of the current franchises to travel internationally for games, the regular season should be extended so that teams can keep the same number of home games. The Bucs are giving up a home game this season.

“I’m not sure our fans would appreciate us giving up a regular-season (home) game, and I know I wouldn’t like to do that. But eventually I think there’s a chance of that if we expand the schedule,” Kraft said.

Kraft said placing an NFL team in London “would be the right thing to do some time in the next decade.”

Goodell said he would prefer a potential London-based team was a completely new franchise, rather than moving one from an existing market.

“We would like to keep all our teams where they are,” he said.

Patriots quarterback Tom Brady(notes) didn’t sound too enthusiastic about playing for a team based in Europe.

“That would be challenging,” Brady said. “But I don’t see that happening any time soon.”

The league is also eyeing having a team in Los Angeles again, especially after California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill this week allowing the construction of a 75,000-seat stadium that developers hope will lure an NFL team back to the Los Angeles area.

“I think there are some positive developments going on there,” Goodell said. “But now we have to figure out how to pay for it. And in our economic system, that is a big challenge. It’s at least an $800 million stadium.”

He would not venture a guess as to what would come first, a team in London or Los Angeles.

“I don’t know about the timing as far as the sequence,” he said. “I would tell you that both markets are of tremendous interest to us.”

AP Sports Writer Chris Lehourites contributed to this report.

Updated Oct 23, 4:31 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

280 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Ryan
    280. Posted by Ryan Sun Oct 25 5:55pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    We all need to shut up.

    Like everything else in this country, none of us are going to do anything about it. We will all keep feeding the beast and when the NFL flops over there we will subsidize its failure with higher ticket prices over here. WE ARE ALL SLAVES!
  2. John K
    279. Posted by John K Sun Oct 25 2:26pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    "bad"dell is a joke!!
  3. John K
    278. Posted by John K Sun Oct 25 2:09pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    What a FRIGGIN' joke!! Hey lets move all AMERICAN sports to iraq---there's a great idea--we'd have TONS of fans!! Did RG fall down and hit his head?
  4. Peter
    277. Posted by Peter Sun Oct 25 12:42pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It all comes down to money doesn't it? Between the athletes who are paid outrageously ridiculous salaries and owners who want ever more money regardless of how much they have, the only option left open to them is to expand the market and the hell with the game and the people who used to enjoy it. Otherwise it makes absolutely no sense at all!!! The travel issues aside (gives a whole new meaning to jet lag) I just can't see a sustained interest in american football in Europe. They are gaga over their soccer stars and maybe mildly curious about american football, but in my mind over a short period of time would be utterly bored by it and would stay away in droves.

    Honestly, nobody but the owners gains a thing and if something isn't done about the ridiculous salary levels, the end of it all is not that far away, as they price themselves out of existence. I bet with the downturn in the economy and therefore the greatly reduced lack of corporate support, the teams must really be starting to feel the pinch as sell outs become a thing of the past!!

    Too bad, I will miss football.
  5. Kim S
    276. Posted by Kim S Sun Oct 25 12:17pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    ""The last time I checked its called the NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE.""

    Yeah, but the winners of the Superbowl call themselves the "World Champions".

    You can't have it both ways, Yank.
  6. <i>rice_owls_fan</i>
    275. Posted by rice_owls_fan Sun Oct 25 11:11am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The facts are simple. NFL franchises need a large fan-base (and fans with money) to survive.

    Green Bay is the exception to the rule, but generally if you place teams in small markets like Jacksonville, well ultimately they'll struggle.

    Of course the NFL are planning for for oversees franchises. LA aside, there's no metro area left in the US that can support a team. San Antonio etc are simply too small. However London, Berlin and The Ruhr are massive markets. There are 8 million people in London, 13 million in the wider SE England area and 60 million in the UK. Never mind hundreds of millions more just a short flight away in Germany, Holland, France, Italy, Spain, Scandinavia etc. Even if 99% of Europeans didn't care about football, you could still sell out Wembley, week after week, if London had an NFL franchise.

    As for logistics - how rarely would a London franchise play a west coast team? For those in the other conference, just once every 4 years (and they would travel to London once every 8 years). Not exactly too much of an inconvenience is it. And don't forget, the majority of NFL franchises are in Eastern and Central (not Pacific) time zones.

    The biggest disadvantage would be to the London team - they would fly the Atlantic 8 times a season. The other teams would do it once or not at all.
  7. R K
    274. Posted by R K Sun Oct 25 10:43am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Don't trust Goodell's decision making...he married Fox news' Jane Skinner --- and she is about as smart and charasmatic as a box...
  8. GB4LYFE
    273. Posted by GB4LYFE Sun Oct 25 10:41am EDT

    Report Abuse

    btjapd: i only have one thing to say to that... AMEN!
  9. GB4LYFE
    272. Posted by GB4LYFE Sun Oct 25 10:34am EDT

    Report Abuse

    GB4LYFE... The NFL shut down the Euro NFL because they wanted to concentrate on having regular season games there and didn't want to be competing against itselft. Do you even do research?


    Uh yeah, I know the NFL shut it down.. so that we could bring our games over there. In the short life of the NFLEuropa , there were two consecutive years of shutdown that it wasn't active. Obviously, having a league over there wasn't worth it, probably because IT WAS COSTING TOO MUCH MONEY. So it was shut down. Say what you want.. that's why it happened. I don't care how big(or small) the market is over there.. its ridiculous. You don't see England vs Spain playing at Toyota Park (Chicago Fire's Field), England wouldn't be happy about that, sending its sport, its games, away to someone else because ITS THEIR GAME! KEEP AMERICAN FOOTBALL OUT OF EVERYWHERE BUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
  10. <i>btjapd</i>
    271. Posted by btjapd Sun Oct 25 10:10am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The season is too long now. Adding another game, or a franchise overseas to complete the "Goodale Legacy" is a crock. What is it? Manifest Destiny in reverse. They keep adding games, changing game times to cater to TV. No officials in the NFL or the TV networks gives a fat rats ass about the fans who attend the games or who have supported their home teams for all these years. It is the same in baseball. Aren't you tired of staying up past midnight to watch games drawn out by slow witted announcers and extra commercial breaks?
    Sour grapes? Yeah, sure, but you try sitting out in sub freezing temperatures in January, waiting for another commercial to get over so play can resume. They ( TV & NFL) want a season to begin in August and end in February. At one time, the season began in Sept. and ended in late December.
    So by now you can probably tell I am an old fart... They have already sucked every last dollar they can out of me. They are aiming at a younger audience, those who have not yet made or spent their hard earned dollars.
    Can't wait to see the Super Bowl played in London, on the 4th of July...
  11. Curtis
    270. Posted by Curtis Sun Oct 25 9:11am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @ Brian, your post was only 100% truth in your own little mind. Euro games are profitable, logistically possible, and ultimately innevitable. Deal with it, Brianna, or stop watching. Actually, Brianna, I hope you, specifically, stop watching one way or another. Good day, princess.
  12. PETER D
    269. Posted by PETER D Sun Oct 25 8:17am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Ask any Buffalo Bills fan (if you can find one right now) how much we enjoyed "home field advantage" against the Miami Dolfins last December in the dome in Toronto. NOT! We got ripped off. Taking teams away from their true home fans is an injustice. Do it to Jerry Jones or Al Davis and see how long that crap lasts. FIRE Goodell.
  13. Brian
    268. Posted by Brian Sun Oct 25 5:46am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Curtis.. "@ Brian. Yeah, those British ''fake fans'' paid money to get into the stadium only to say ''bloody 'ell, I thought this was a futbol game''.......your statement was incredibly presumptuous and ignorant.

    Sorry you can't deal with reality or think clearly enough Miss Curtis... what i wrote is 100% the truth.. I'm not asking you or anybody else to agree with me.. i wouldn't want you too.. you're not the type of dude i'd call a friend or the type of person i'd want to associate with.. my standards are high

    The UK are "fake fans" and yes they'll spend money to see anything american ) I'm sure the british girls will be after all the big c o c k since little boys like you can't please them) facts are facts the NFL fans.. the american fans who follow their HOME team, buy tickets and merchandise are the ones who get robbed.. it's simple reality the reality you don't want to read the reality you can't stand.. i can see an NBA game over in the UK or a Hockey game or even an MLB game so be it since they play a ton a games each year..but the NFL only has 16 games a year 8 games are at home and for the home fans it's simply unfair so in return " your statement was incredibly presumptuous and ignorant.
  14. martin h
    266. Posted by martin h Sun Oct 25 5:29am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The reason why NFL Europe didn't work (other than in Germany) was that it was basically made up with cast offs from NFL teams. So while still a decent level, the teams didn't have a real identity or have a settled side. It's always difficult to relate to a team whose players are just trying to play well enough to get out of that league & back into the NFL.

    I'm not sure about a franchise in England, but a 17th game with everyone playing abroad somewhere could work. that way you could limit the travel so that the west coast teams play in say Mexico or Canada & the East coast teams play in Europe.
  15. 8 Gauge Pump
    265. Posted by 8 Gauge Pump Sun Oct 25 4:54am EDT

    Report Abuse

    A team based over there would not be fair for anybody. Do they play all home games with everybody going to them? Think of the travel and the jet lag for teams from the west coast. Same goes for the team that would be over there. Traveling would be awful. It takes 3 or so days just to overcome the jet lag. This is one of the worst ideas ever. You can bring back the NFL Europe on a smaller scale. Maybe something like 20 teams with a 12 week season and 8 teams with a 3 week playoff.
  16. martin h
    264. Posted by martin h Sun Oct 25 4:03am EDT

    Report Abuse

    If you're saying it is a National league, then i am assuming the NHL & NBA need to pull all of their teams out of Canada.
  17. martin h
    263. Posted by martin h Sun Oct 25 4:00am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Get used to it, so long as the games over here sell out the games will continue as it is about making money for all nfl teams. I agree though that it is unfair on the team that loses a home game, so why not add a 17th week in & remove the bye week then everyone plays a game somewhere outside America. Even more money for you then. I wouldn't start talking too much about someone setting up their own league as all you need is a bunch of billionaires to start their own league & pay players more than the nfl does & the players will soon go & play there. At the end of the day money talks.
  18. Curtis
    262. Posted by Curtis Sun Oct 25 3:53am EDT

    Report Abuse

    GB4LYFE... The NFL shut down the Euro NFL because they wanted to concentrate on having regular season games there and didn't want to be competing against itselft. Do you even do research?
  19. <i>cardsownzpanthers</i>
    261. Posted by cardsownzpanthers Sun Oct 25 3:15am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Globalization ? :(
  20. GB4LYFE
    260. Posted by GB4LYFE Sun Oct 25 3:02am EDT

    Report Abuse

    uh.. why would we play any games over seas in any countries? isn't it the National Football League? not the International Football League.. and wasn't there already a Euro league? and what happened to that? oh yeah.. IT FLOPPED... or whatever.. its gone! If they want football.. let them start their league back up instead of taking away HOME GAMES from the states! And it is ridiculous to even think that a super bowl for the NFL.. a match up between the NFC( NATIONAL Football Conference) and the AFC(AMERICAN Football Conference) could be respectively played in London. Goodell needs to get his mind right. if you want.. play a game over there that no one cares about.. bring the probowl over there.. if they gotta see something in Britain.. let em see the best of the best.. play like they don't care.. maybe a preseason game or two.. other than that.. KEEP OUR LEAGUE HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!! You will loose A LOT of fans where it counts if you keep up this London crap. This is me standing in front of the commissioner's office holding up a sign that reads "Goodell go to H#ll"
    GO PACK!
  21. 2112
    259. Posted by 2112 Sun Oct 25 12:32am EDT

    Report Abuse

    London calling!
  22. wildrebel
    258. Posted by wildrebel Sat Oct 24 11:06pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    if they have to play a game in europe i think it should at least be a preseason game
  23. Paul S
    257. Posted by Paul S Sat Oct 24 10:33pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    a team in London.. absolutely stupid. end of discussion.
  24. george s
    256. Posted by george s Sat Oct 24 10:07pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    POST 42, Neismith a Canadian invented the sport in Spriingfield Mass, it was played here first so that makes it an American invention.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight