Shutdown Corner - NFL

Aside from the Kris Brown(notes) missed field goal that ended the game and gave the Indianapolis Colts a 20-17 win over the Houston Texans on Sunday, the play that affected the Texans' chances of winning a very tight game was the fumble by running back Ryan Moats(notes) with 2:24 left in the first half. Moats had rumbled forward after catching a quick pass from quarterback Matt Schaub(notes), was hit by safety Antoine Bethea(notes) at the 3-yard line, and rolled out of bounds at the 2. However, Moats lost control of the ball before he went out of bounds, and the fumble was recovered by cornerback Jerraud Powers(notes).

The officials had blown the play dead at 2:24, assuming that Moats had gone out of bounds, the Texans let the clock run down before running another play, and that gave the Colts enough time to challenge the out-of-bounds call. Jeff Triplette's crew reversed the call on review, and the ruling was a touchback because Powers touched the ball as it lay on the goal line before he established two feet back inbounds. Indy's ball, potential game-deciding touchdown averted.

But according to Alan Burge of the Houston Texans Examiner, Triplette may have missed something that would have changed Powers' recovery.

The loose ball contacted Bethea's left arm as he tackled Moats and while Bethea's right leg was out of bounds at the 2 yard line. That means it should have been a dead ball there, right? And whatever happened after that should have been irrelevant, right?

My update: From the Official Rules of the NFL, Rule 8, Article 2: "A fumble is legally recovered or caught in bounds by a player if the player had both feet in bounds prior to the recovery or catch." Triplette's crew probably went with Rule 7, Article 6 (c): "A fumble in the field of play that goes into the opponent's end zone and over the end line or sideline results in the ball being given over to the defensive team and a touchback awarded" based on their belief that Bethea had both feet in bounds.

Burge has a picture of his DVR here, showing where he believes the dead ball spot should have occurred.

The lower image clearly shows that Bethea's right leg was out of bounds while in contact with the loose ball at the moment the upper photo was taken. Bethea's right elbow (that fuzzy black spot - he was wearing a large pad on his elbow) was also on the white line. In the milliseconds after this screen capture - and as Bethea is even further out of bounds - you can see Bethea's left arm move backward and push the ball toward the goal line where Powers (25) was waiting.

Texans head coach Gary Kubiak has filed a report with the league. "The bottom line, they're saying that the ball was not touched by anybody who was out of bounds," he said on Monday. "Or if it was, it was only touched by Ryan [Moats], who was on top of another player. We thought looking at it that No. 41 [Bethea] is touching the ball and he's out of bounds. So we'll hear back from them."

This call will certainly make vice president of officiating Mike Pereira's weekly Official Review segment on the NFL Network worth watching -- when Rich Eisen asks Pereira to explain it, let's hope there's a better explanation than, "Well, our guys blew a call that could affect the landscape in the AFC South for the rest of the season."

digg delicious
more

183 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. matt
    1. Posted by matt Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:36 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Even if this was valid, the Texans can't blame the officiating for the loss.
    Moats shouldn't have fumbled. Bottom line.
  2. Donald Hogan
    2. Posted by Donald Hogan Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:47 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Ironic that Moats fumbles away a game after Slaton fumbled away his position...
  3. hxnguyen321
    3. Posted by hxnguyen321 Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:48 am EST

    Report Abuse

    interesting.... I can't wait to hear how Mike Pereira are going to explain this to Texans' fans. I think it should've resulted in Colts' ball at the 2 yard line. Considering that both Moats or Bethea were falling out of bound, while neither one of them has possession of the ball while the ball is still inbound, the ball should be awarded to the player who touches the ball first while being out of bound, which in this case seems to be Bethea.
  4. Fuzion
    4. Posted by Fuzion Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:59 am EST

    Report Abuse

    hxnguyen321, NFL rules dictate that unless the defense possesses (not touches) the ball before it goes out of bounds, it is considered a dead ball and the offense would retain possession where the ball went out bounds. It is similar on kick-offs and any other situation. The team with the ball would retain in the event of a fumble that goes out of bounds before the opposing team can gather possession of the ball. With the defensive player out of bounds, the ball is ruled dead, as I stated, therefore it would've been Texans ball on the 4 yard line (or 2 as has been said elsewhere). Just clarifying.
  5. Chris H
    5. Posted by Chris H Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:41 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Since when is a player eligible at all after going out of bounds? And if read correctly, the refs ruled that the Texans ran it out of bounds? Then how did they let the clock run down? and if the refs ruled that he was down, HOU ball, out of bounds, then he wasn't looking at the fumble and recovery afterward it was play dead as ruled. simple as that
  6. ChristheYankee
    6. Posted by ChristheYankee Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:28 am EST

    Report Abuse

    I heard nothing until now about Bethea's leg or arm being out of bounds.Bottom line,the ball bounced off Bethea before bouncing or rolling to the goal line where it broke the plain,therefore making it a touchback after being downed by an Indianapolis defensive player.Believe it or not,I think Triplett is one of the better Ref's in the league.Which ain't saying much as the officiating gets worse by the day.Example:I watched the last 6:24 of the Pittsburgh/Denver Mon.Night Game & with the game essentially out of reach Orton threw a short pass to Buckhalter who was wiped out upon Harrison's arrival at the spot where Buckhalter & the ball made contact,replay shows it was unquestionably a helmet to helmet hit,result:no call,incomplete pass.
  7. David B
    7. Posted by David B Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:47 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Give me a break. A Texas writer freezing frames, blowing them up and going over them with a microscope? It's a game of football not the Kennedy assassination! Sorry your Texans lost a game but get over it, quit your whining and move on.
  8. jeffn
    8. Posted by jeffn Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:43 am EST

    Report Abuse

    I am a Browns fan, so I have no stake in this argument, but I thought this was obvious when shown live, and even emailed some friends about it because I was so shocked they got it wrong on review. And to whoever criticized the Houston writer for freeze-framing video -- that's exactly what Triplette is supposed to do, but obviously failed at. That's legitimate criticism.
  9. FlasherZ
    9. Posted by FlasherZ Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:44 am EST

    Report Abuse

    I went back and looked at the play in question. It is unclear whether Bethea touches the ball or not. Moats (who remains in bounds) definitely changes the trajectory of the ball when it gets batted back in the center of play by his hand.
    The angles of camera shots make it difficult to say conclusively that Bethea did or did not touch the ball -- that's why in replay the focus is on trajectory changes. A simple example is the play a few weeks ago where CBS showed an off-angle shot of a measurement where the officials declared a first down but the angle used showed the player short by 3-4 inches. If it isn't completely obvious that Bethea made contact, and the camera angle doesn't show Bethea changing the trajectory of the ball, they have to assume that he didn't touch it and that it was a camera angle.
  10. mike f
    10. Posted by mike f Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:54 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Hey Christhe,
    Just who in the heck brought up Chad Johnson? Or T.O., or Mike Vick, or character issues????? THIS IS ABOUT THE TEXANS-COLTS GAME! Geez whatta LOSER!!! GET A LIFE!
  11. John
    11. Posted by John Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:55 am EST

    Report Abuse

    The problem with the Houston Texans is the coaching staff. They have no idea what "time management" is. 1st they should have not allowed the clock to run down to 2:00. 2nd "Big Schaub" almost let the clock run out in the 4th quarter. Gary Kubiak needs to go back somewhere as an assistant coach.
  12. Rick A
    12. Posted by Rick A Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:14 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Ahh, the out-of-bounds fumble rule. We old time Bills fans are familiar with it. During one of the bad old days in a close game against a top team (can't remember exactly who), a Bill DB hit the opposing receiver so hard it caused a fumble and knocked him out too. The receiver was laying unconcious on the field with one foot out of bounds. During the scramble for the fumble, the ball bounced off him ending the play.
  13. Honsu
    13. Posted by Honsu Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:26 am EST

    Report Abuse

    The Texans have no one to blame but themselfs. First off plain and simple don't fumble. Second be smart about things and hurry up and run another play instead of giving a team a opertunity to throw the challenge flag.
    Then ya know obviously don't fail at getting a feild goal to put the game in OT...but thats another story.
  14. a_goodsinner_badsaint
    14. Posted by a_goodsinner_badsaint Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:37 am EST

    Report Abuse

    I was just shocked Kris Brown missed the field goal. ... It is an interesting analysis - even as a Texans fan I agree that it is hard to tell from the camera angle that Bethea touched it. As far as letting the clock run down , that is not so much time management as game management. Anytime there is a ruling in your favor that is questionable, you run the play right away to prevent the challenge. As far as time - you should run the clock above 2 minutes when you about to score against Indy - the last thing you want is Manning with time.
  15. Robert S
    15. Posted by Robert S Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:39 am EST

    Report Abuse

    good job to the texans you almost got us but our badly beaten up defense that the media said was horrible i think they looked pretty good against matt shuab is he ok or does he still have freenyitis LOL see ya in three weeks
  16. Ben
    16. Posted by Ben Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:54 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Bad calls or good calls, it is all part of the game. If you put yourself in a such a precarious position that one bad call kills you, then that is your own fault. Officiating is another human element and the colts have fallen victim to it, as have EVERY other team in every other sport. Final word....dont miss field goals and dont play sloppy.
  17. Instant Money
    17. Posted by Instant Money Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:58 am EST

    Report Abuse

    The Texans had a chance to snap the ball, but they let the clock run down to the 2 min warning.
  18. Fantasy Champ
    18. Posted by Fantasy Champ Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:13 am EST

    Report Abuse

    I think even if the Colts ended up with the ball they should have had it at the 2 because yes the ball was fumbled into the endzone but the Colts player ran it out.
  19. Charles J
    19. Posted by Charles J Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:30 am EST

    Report Abuse

    "Bottom Line"...we'll never know, because the Refs didn't do their job.
  20. David M
    20. Posted by David M Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:35 am EST

    Report Abuse

    This was exactly what I saw. I couldn't believe the refs missed this replay. From the sideline video angle, you couldn't tell it hit Bethea's left arm. Though, from the endzone video angle, it was pretty damn clear.
  21. woodardm@...
    21. Posted by woodardm@... Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:51 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Hey david b, bite me!
  22. colts_win2002
    22. Posted by colts_win2002 Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:59 am EST

    Report Abuse

    A person cannot come in bounds to make a reception, but can recover a fumble. The refs got it right. The ball was live, no one was out of bounds. The picture clearly shows, his hips were still in bounds, his legs were in the air still not touching the ground, as he arm was on the Helmet of Moats not the ball. Also, the Ball stayed live and in bounds, while no one has posession of the ball. I reviewed several times before the Colts challenged and knew they would challenge and get the ball at the 20.
  23. Rob
    23. Posted by Rob Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:00 am EST

    Report Abuse

    That photo shows nothing definitive. And the rule is video evidence; not a still photo pored over for 3 days.
  24. sam k
    24. Posted by sam k Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:14 am EST

    Report Abuse

    Yawn. Texans fans are babies b/c they are completely owned by the Colts. 14-1 speaks volumes more than a fuzzy freeze-frame vidcap. How about Schaub tossing 2 crucial INTs against a patchwork Colts secondary and Kris Brown not connecting on a FG when it counts? That's why the Texans are the Texans and the Colts are the Colts. It won't be so close in two weeks - Colts will roll again and the Texans will have to wait another year to "break out."
  25. joe h
    25. Posted by joe h Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:21 am EST

    Report Abuse

    It's karma for benching slaton and costing me my fantasy game, go to hell kubiak

Shutdown Corner

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

MJD

Shutdown Corner is an NFL blog edited by Matthew J. Darnell. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Shutdown Corner Recent Readers