Vegas Watch posted these over/under numbers on wins in the upcoming season, via Sportsbook.com. There's some interesting stuff in here for the enterprising folks among you who feel confident about projecting NFL win totals in mid-May.

If you're not gambling inclined (unlike my friend Crazy Fish Guy), let's take a second and understand what we're looking at here. The over/under, the number in the column immediately to the right of the team name, represents the number of wins for that team in the coming season. For example, Oakland's over/under is six. If you think they'll win more than six games, you bet the over. If you think you'll win less, you bet the under.

Then you've got the Over and Under numbers to the right of those, which complicate things a touch. If the number is a negative, using Oakland as an example again, to bet their over, you're betting -170. That means you have to bet $170 to win $100, which, obviously, is not in your favor.

If the number's a positive, that's how much you'll win if you're right and you bet $100. With Oakland again, if you think they're winning under six games, and you bet $100, and you're right, you win $140. That's good news for you. The difference between the -170 and the +140 represents how Vegas is going to take your money, which they will then use to build a newer, brighter, shinier way to take more of your money.

Some of these lines seem demented clown-insane to me, but then again, if I could somehow look into the future and get the standings for the end of this upcoming season, I'd probably look at them and say, "Nope. There's no freakin' way." There will be at least a handful of teams that defy expectation, in a good way or in a bad way.

That said, it's hard to envision anyone thinking it's a good idea to risk $180 to win $100 on Buffalo winning eight or more games. I'd say the same of Arizona at -140.

On the other side of the coin, I like Atlanta coming in at four wins or less at $130. They'll be playing either a rookie quarterback or a bad veteran quarterback, with an unproven starting running back, no Alge Crumpler and no DeAngelo Hall, and they're going to improve? Losing Bobby Petrino was a good thing, but I don't know if it was that good.

What about you? Where's your money going?

Related: NFL Media, NFL League Issues, NFL Oddness