Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:07 am EDT
When
Michael
Vick found a new employer, the battleground was immediately marked off for
the inevitable battle between animal rights protesters and whoever they decide
to get mad at. The battleground will be Philadelphia, and to a lesser extent,
the eight cities the Eagles will briefly visit over the course of the season.
There will be different groups conducting different protests for different reasons, and they'll all take different approaches. Some will be more inflammatory and destructive than others. Some people are mad as hell that Vick is back in the NFL, and they want to make someone's life miserable because of it.
My advice to those people, and anyone who feels the need to protest Michael Vick's(notes) presence in the NFL, is this: Don't do it that way. Don't take an attacking, vengeful, scorched-earth approach to this. For one thing, it's not going to work, and for another, it's not where your focus should be.
There's absolutely nothing you can do that's going to make Eagles fans turn against the Eagles. That's not happening. Maybe a few fringe fans fall by the wayside with the Vick signing, but anyone with more than a passing interest in the team -- and I'm speaking of the tens of thousands of people who eagerly pay for overpriced tickets, and the tens of thousands more who would if there were more tickets available -- aren't going anywhere, for any reason. If you're not a huge football fan, please take my word for this: The NFL has a grip on people like you cannot believe. For a great many people, the NFL is right up there with air, food, water and shelter.
No matter what you do, The Linc is going to be filled every Sunday. Any
attempt at a boycott will be laughably futile. That's a guarantee. The only
things that make people stop coming to football games are losing streaks. Dog
murder will not have nearly the impact on the gate as the won/loss record. I'm
not condoning it. I'm just letting you know.
So don't make this a battle against people who love the Eagles and will tolerate
Vick's presence. Again, you're not going to win that battle, and more
importantly, those people aren't the enemy. They don't have anything to do with
the real goal here (or what should be the real goal), which is drawing
attention to dogfighting and doing our best to eliminate it in the future.
That's what's important, isn't it? That we curb the practice of dogfighting?
Put your focus there. You can try to lead boycotts, you can yell and scream at Vick, you can try to make fans feel bad about following the Eagles and you can be as vindictive as you want. But how does that help? Does that bring any dogs back to life? Does it do anything but cause conflict between people?
Put your focus on the future and try to accomplish something that can save
dog lives for years to come. The biggest advantage you have here is that your
message is 100% in the right: Dogfighting is wrong, criminal, evil and
intolerable. I think you'll find that the overwhelming majority of football fans
-- even Michael Vick fans -- agree with you.
By all means, use Michael Vick to draw attention to your cause. Make an anti-dogfighting message Vick's major contribution to the world for the rest of his life, whether he wants it to be or not. Vick, no matter where he goes or what he does, is going to be a lightning rod for attention. Jump on that.
Take that attention, and use it to reach young people who might find themselves right now in same situation where Vick was when he was a kid: in an environment that tolerates dogfighting.
If you take that attention, though, and use it to rail against people who have given Michael Vick a second chance, or people who don't agree that Vick should never play football again, you're wasting it. That doesn't do anyone any good. The future of Michael Vick the football player shouldn't be of the slightest interest to you.
What's truly important are the lives and health of any dogs who might be looking at a future of fighting one another. Put your focus on the kids who are susceptible to getting caught up in it.
That's what Michael Vick's doing. Don't let him do it better than you.
Elsewhere on the Yahoo! Sports Blogs:
• Surprise: Michael Vick signs deal with Philadelphia Eagles
• Jen Utley isn't afraid to hound Eagles' signing of Michael Vick
• Belichick to NFL: I'm afraid the Death Star is fully operational
Sign up now for Fantasy Football '09 -- now with free live scoring
Shutdown Corner is an NFL blog edited by Matthew J. Darnell. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Nov 24 2009
NFL: Struggling teams - Who's to blame?
Posted Nov 24 2009
Patriots CB Hands Out Turkeys In South Fla.
Posted Nov 24 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
1493 Comments
1 - 24 of 1493
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
But will they listen? I doubt it.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Does anyone even want to consider the possibility that Vick may actually have realized the error of his ways and the end result is that he influences a bunch of kids and they grow up and don't fight dogs.
There could be a huge positive out of this whole situation, but people don't want to realize it. They just want Vick to fry baby fry.
And ever think of how many NFL guys probably shut down their own dogfighting rings because of Vick getting busted? Another positive.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
NFL can withstand probably the worst of the worst without much marketing damage. Any groups protesting vick's offensive behavior most likely will be wasting their time.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Because you clearly have no convictions -- unless we're looking into your own criminal record -- please don't lecture those of us who love dogs and despise brutal thugs like Vick on where we should put our focus. Vick is the poster child for abuse, for violence, for hate and for thuggery. Vick has yet to demonstrate any regret and has yet to demonstrate any active attempts at atonement.
And so, Vick deserves to be one of many points of focus, as do any morally bankrupt, politically correct idiots who support Vick and choose to condone his behavior -- and yes, by defending him you ARE condoning his behavior.
What's even more pathetic is that I suspect you're not even convinced of the soundness of your own argument. I think you're writing in defense of Vick's thuggery and the Eagles' appalling decision merely to stir up controversy for your own hackneyed writing and to push your left-wing, PC ideas down our throats. I sincerely doubt you'd be defending him if he were white.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 1493