Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:33 pm EDT
Baltimore
Ravens rookie tackle Michael Oher(notes) has played exceedingly well so far this
season. Yesterday, though, he faced a very stiff challenge from Minnesota
Vikings defensive end Jared Allen(notes), who's in the conversation for 2009 defensive
MVP, if not outright MVP.
How'd it go? Well, let's ask the competitors. What say you, Michael Oher? From BaltimoreSun.com:
"In the second half, I feel like I shut him out," Oher said. "There is nothing really special about him. I think if we played them [in Baltimore], it would make a big difference. The false starts were just mistiming the snap." [...]
"I think he found out I'm an OK player," Oher said. "Guy makes like $100 million. I think I did all right."
Care to retort, Mr. Allen? Via Pro Football Talk:
"Well that's just some idiot trying to talk himself up," Allen said. "I beat that dude like a red-headed stepchild, let's be honest. If he was so good why did they have to chip me all day? Ask him that.
"That's just a rookie trying to build his self-confidence up. Besides, you lost and your quarterback spent his whole day on the back of his head until the fourth quarter. That guy [Oher] will watch film today and realize. Everybody else in the world saw me abuse him."
So what's the truth of the matter? Most observers, I believe, would give the individual matchup to Allen, but it sort of depends on how you're judging. Allen had six-and-a-half sacks in five games previous to this one, and Oher allowed him just one. Oher did commit a couple of false starts, though, and Allen did spend his share of time in the Ravens' backfield.
When you consider Allen's dominance so far in 2009, though, I think it would also be fair to say that Oher played him better than a lot of tackles out there would have. Factor in that Oher's a rookie, and that that was just his second game at left tackle, and I say he grades out fan-freaking-tastically.
Then again, I'm biased, because I find Oher about 750,000 times more likeable than Allen. Really, I wish they'd both pipe down. Oher eventually will be the kind of tackle who can completely house anyone, but he's not there yet. Allen is currently the kind of defensive end who can dominate anyone, so he can calm down about beating a rookie.
Gracias, PFT.
Shutdown Corner is an NFL blog edited by Matthew J. Darnell. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Fantasy: Gentlemen's League: Thanksgiving showdown
Posted Nov 26 2009
NFL: Struggling teams - Who's to blame?
Posted Nov 24 2009
Posted Nov 24 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
125 Comments
1 - 25 of 125
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
HAHAHA... This coming from a red-neck who slept his stepchild!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Allen owned him. It isn't just about sacks, its what his pressure alone causes the line to do. It slows down the TE going out into a pass pattern, the "bubbles" he creates with pressure causing the RB to have to adjust his running lane. The pressure that Flacco "feels" without being pressured...
I wish people who watched football actually watched football... Sacks are ONE aspect of ONE statistical category.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Allen had six and a half sacks in five games. First of all, that number is factoring in the 4.5 sack performance that came against Green Bay. Take out the Green Bay game and he's averaging less than a sack per game. But let's count those sacks. His average comes out to 1.3 sacks a game. Let's round down. He's averaging one sack per game. Jared Allen got one sack. Got his average.
Oher didn't perform fan-freaking-tastically at all.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Bottom line. If Antoine Winfield is in the game, the Vikings are probably not in that situation where Paymah tried to defend a pass with his back turned allowing Mark Clayton a gift of a touchdown.
The better team won, folks. The Ravens played well, but the better team won.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Currently on jared Allen's Wiki-page.
Hilarious!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Does anyone know if the boy is still alive?
I cannot believe he confessed to beating him so badly!
Roger Goodel should investigate his child beating.
Who would ever own up to such a horrible thing?
Unbelievable!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You wrote" Oher won the matchup when the game was on the line, and his team should have won the game."
Well, his team DIDN'T win the game. You can say that about half the NFL games every week. "Well, this team shouldn't won the game because of this & that." "Well, if it wasn't for that pass interference call, my team would have won". Blah, blah, blah. Dude, it all evens out eventually. Every team goes through that. A missed field goal is part of the game. Pass interference is part of the game. Everything is part of the game, so to say they should have won, but missed a field goal. ??? Well, he missed it, so they SHOULDN'T have won, now should they have? Yes, Baltimore outplayed the Vikes the last 10 minutes in the 4the quarter, but that's it. So, they should have won because of that? If I remember right, the Vikes toasted the Ravens in the first half. It was only the last 10 minutes that the Ravens played well enough to win. It came down to a missed field goal. Look at Vikes, it they would have scored just one more touchdown instead of their 4 field goals in the red zone, it never would've came down to a field goal. But I don't sit here & say, "Well, the Vikes should've had 4 more touchdowns instead of field goals." It's part of the game. The guy missed it, they lost. Jays, get over it.
1 - 25 of 125