Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:20 pm EDT
I
mentioned it in passing yesterday, but I'm feeling more and more like it warrants its own
post. I guess that's because it looks today like the Lions are actually serious
about this "let's just take whoever's cheaper" business.
The Lions have been negotiating with both Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry and Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford. Tom Kowalski of mlive.com reports that they've already got a deal with Curry in the bag, but have yet to reach an agreement with Stafford.
He says it's not just a negotiatic tactic, either. The Lions have identified a player they want, but might not take him, because the other guy is giving them a discount. Writes Kowalski:
The Lions already have come to terms on a deal with Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry, but the Lions are waiting to see if their No. 1 target -- Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford -- will agree to a contract prior the start of the draft at 4 p.m. Saturday.
According to a league source, the Lions expect Stafford's agent, Tom Condon, to see if he can get a better deal with another team a slot or two lower than the Lions. Remember, last year Condon got a better contract for quarterback Matt Ryan ($34.75 million guaranteed), who was the third overall pick, than tackle Jake Long received as the first pick ($30 million guaranteed).
Stafford's negotiating to see if he can get a better deal with another team? Wait a second. Teams still draft players, right? As opposed to players drafting teams? That's still how it works, yes?
I don't know. I guess that's irrelevant. What I want to focus on is that the Lions might be settling for a player they don't want as badly as they want another player, because that first player comes a little cheaper.
That's crazy. That's foolish. That's the stuff 0-16 is made of. That is, dare I say, Millen-esque.
Don't get me wrong. I do understand the importance of frugality in the NFL. There's a salary cap, you've gotta squeeze everyone under it, you pinch pennies where you can ... I get it. Managing money is key.
But you just went 0-16, gentlemen. That's a pretty clear sign that the players you have are not very good at playing football, and you need players who are better at playing football. You need to take the guy you think is best. You take the guy who you think helps the Detroit Lions the most.
You are not the New England Patriots. You do not have a roster with just a couple of holes to be plugged, here and there. Your roster is a hole.
This isn't about my opinions on Curry, Stafford, or Jason Smith. I don't care who they like best. My opinion doesn't matter. Take Greg Paulus if you think he's the best option; I don't care. I won't criticize any choice, so long as it's made for the right reasons. If they think Curry gets them to respectability faster, fine, take Curry. If they think Stafford gets them to respectability faster, then take Stafford.
Whoever they take is going to be overpaid. That's just the way it works in the NFL today.
But you've still got to take the best player. And do you know why, Lions? It's because you suck, and you have to get better. If you don't get better, you will continue to suck. Do you like sucking? Do you like fans with paper bags over their heads? Do you like making the Detroit auto industry look well-run and innovative by comparison?
Take the best player. Make a football decision here. Do not let the embarrassment continue.
Shutdown Corner is an NFL blog edited by Matthew J. Darnell. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Fantasy: Gentlemen's League: Thanksgiving showdown
Posted Nov 27 2009
Monday Day Night Football: Saints vs. Patriots
Posted Nov 25 2009
Posted Nov 24 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
82 Comments
1 - 25 of 82
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
For any reasonable GM/owner, this would not be an issue. You have the #1 pick, TAKE THE GUY YOU WANT!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Overpaid linebacker who makes maybe 10-15 plays a game or an overpaid QB who touches the ball for EVERY OFFENSIVE SNAP? This is a no-brainer folks...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
so if the goal is to stop being an embarrassment as quickly as possible, they shouldn't even consider stafford regardless of his perceived long-term value. and if the goal is to truly take the "best player" to help turn the team's fortunes around in the long term, then stafford makes sense only insofar as he represents value relative the other options keeping the salary cap in mind. which one is it?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Curry is the best and long term option for the Lions. Not Stafford. And if they can get a discount more power to them. A strong defense can get you to and win a Superbowl (Chicago Bears, Baltimore Ravens, Tampa Bay Bucs). Who was more important in getting The Ravens to and winning a Superbowl, Ray Lewis or Trent Dilfer? Chicago Bears a few years back, Rex Grossman or Lance Briggs? Brad Johnson or Derrick Derrick Brooks. Look at Tennessee last year. Defense got them to the Play-offs. It sure wasn't Collins and now we have their defensive co-ordinator.
The fans want Curry and will not give Stafford a chance.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The Lions NEED a QB. Culpepper is not the answer in the short or long term. He can't even stay healthy. Stafford may not be Matt Ryan, but he's at least as good as Flacco. Wouldn't you rather have Joe Flacco than a linebacker?
I think it'd be better for them to take a left tackle over Curry.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
The lions have said all along that they would be happy with Jason Smith, Aaron curry or Matt Stafford, and that signability is a big issue. It is amazing that they have created leverage among these players and are going to get the best deal out of it when at 0-16 they shouldn't have any leverage at all.
Why should a team in a struggling city economically go throwing around money like crazy on just one player. It sets a good example for the city, showing that you can save money and still get what you need. They also can use the money they save to go out and sign a free-agent that could be useful in the next few off seasons. MJD, you obviously don't know crap about detroit.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You are an idiot.
Report Abuse
Sanchez scares me - a good QB who had mediocre stats even though surrounded by one of the most talented teams in college FB. So what do we do - do what Smooty say: Get the biggest, most talented fat boys you can find and build your lines. Pick up an excellent LB in the 2nd or 3rd round and a "nobody" QB who may turn out like Flacco and if not get your QB next year.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 82