If you don't remember, it may come as a serious surprise to know that New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton, justifiably regarded by many as the best play-caller in the league these days, was demoted from those very same duties when he served under Jim Fassel as the New York Giants' offensive coordinator. After two years as the Philadelphia Eagles' quarterbacks coach, Payton was hired by the Giants before the 1999 season to do the same for them.

After a season, he was promoted to offensive coordinator, a position he held from 2000 through 2002. Under Payton's tutelage, Kerry Collins(notes) threw for three of his four best single-season yardage totals, including his only 4,000-yard season in 2002. However, scoring and red zone efficiency were issues -- the G-Men ranked ninth in yards but 21st in points in 2001, and sixth in yards but 22nd in points in 2002.

As the New York Times reported it, Fassel took play-calling duties away from Payton in late October, 2002:

''I will make any changes necessary, within the limits of knowing we're not in training camp now,'' Fassel said. ''I'm not going to sit still and watch us average one touchdown per game. I'm not going to do it ... When something needs to be done, when we need to shake things up, I will make a change.''

Payton, whose mother had passed away two weeks before his demotion, was nonplussed and unimpressed.

"I don't know that play-calling is the reason we're 3-4, let's just say that ... there are certain people whose heads are on a different plane than others. It's always been a head coach, a coordinator, a quarterback. That's part of the deal, and that's part of the responsibility to these positions. I take full responsibility for what we've done on offense. From there, we'll see what happens. He's the head coach. Ultimately, he's in charge. I'm sure he'll do what's best for this team.''

Payton went to Dallas after the 2002 season, and the Giants plummeted from 10-6 to 4-12 without him. Fassel was gone after the 2003 season. Under Bill Parcells in Dallas, Payton stumped for a little-known undrafted quarterback by the name of Tony Romo(notes), and helped rebuild Dallas' offense with three primary quarterbacks -- Quincy Carter, Vinny Testaverde(notes), and Drew Bledsoe(notes). By the time Romo was ready to take over the offense, Payton had departed for New Orleans, and an unimaginably bright future.

Sometimes, talent is tough to spot. And sometimes, head coaches make personnel decisions based on their own job security. Fassel's career was never the same after he demoted Payton -- he was last seen writing love letters to Al Davis and coaching in the UFL. Saints fans certainly wouldn't have it any other way, but one wonders what would have happened with Fassel's career had he stuck by one very talented young offensive mind...

With football season over, there are new things to look forward to: the scouting combine, free agency, the draft ... and more stories about dysfunctional Redskins!

Ah, yes. You see, some things are seasonal, and some are everyday. Redskins goofiness is everyday.

The most recent bloviation came from formerly interesting and funny running back Clinton Portis(notes), who admitted that he tried to have fullback Mike Sellers benched. Once that was out of the way, Portis took off on former Washington linebacker LaVar Arrington(notes) and the "real" reason Arrington left the team after the 2005 season.

"In D.C., some of the players feel like it was a money situation, who getting the money is a captain. Arrington was the man in D.C. when I arrived, and all of the sudden LaVar felt like it was competition, and he left D.C. He didn't want to be in D.C. any more. He gave back 15, 20 million dollars to leave D.C. because he felt like he wasn't the main money guy, because everybody was getting [paid]."

Erm, OK. That explanation strains credulity, but the real reason for this post is Arrington's reply, which sent chills up my spine. Download the audio here, and listen as you read. It's pretty inspiring stuff, and here are a few excerpts.

"I am looking around a field, and as fate would have it, just listen to some of these names, just listen to some of these names. Champ Bailey(notes). Mark Carrier. Darrell Green. Andre Reed. Dana Stubblefield. Brad Johnson(notes). Deion Sanders. Larry Centers. Marco Coleman. Stephen Davis(notes). Dan 'Big Daddy' Wilkinson. Chris Samuels(notes), my litter mate. Jon Jansen(notes). Irving Fryar. Bruce Smith. I am on the field as a 21-year-old young man that has fulfilled the first part of a dream, to make it onto a professional team and actually be something that I wanted to be my whole life. I'm sitting here as a professional, beside myself that I am actually on the same field as these individuals...

"I respect the game. I would have never argued with Sam Huff. I would have never argued with Brian Mitchell. I would never have argued with John Riggins. I would never have argued with Sonny Jurgensen. I would not disrespect the people who were the forerunners, who were the people who set the bar where it needed to be for us to be willing to dream and try to achieve. I would never disrespect that. I would never take that and spit on that, like that is not something that is as precious as the gold that we all spend money on. I would not disrespect that.

"I protect this with my heart, I protect this with my soul, I would not do that for just attention. Understand the message, because this message is for the ones out there that are our athletes of tomorrow. We are losing a battle here. Our battle is not about who gets the most publicity. Our battle is not about who makes the most touchdowns or makes the most money. Our battle is being someone that the next generation can sit back and look at you and be proud about what you are, what you represent, what you say, what you do ... I am upset right now, because we continue to depict ourselves in a way that is not right. And for what? For some attention? What's your motivation?"

Strong stuff. You can read the transcript from our friend Dan Steinberg at the indispensable D.C. Sports Bog, and I highly recommend you do so. Whatever you may think of Arrington, and that he may have been a relative disappointment for his high draft pick, he's got one heck of a future as a motivational speaker if he wants it.

And as for Clinton Portis? Head back to the wigs and funny glasses, dude. "Southeast Jerome" would NOT respect this, were he still alive ...

The parade for the world champion New Orleans Saints starts a few hours from now, outside of the Superdome. Up to 200,000 people are expected to be there, and when that many revelers gather in New Orleans, you expect certain New Orleans traditions to be upheld, right?

Not so, this time around. New Orleans police are ordering the women of New Orleans to keep their New Orleans traditions covered. The parade's going to be televised, both locally and online, and apparently, some city officials see this as a reason to keep things G-rated. TMZ reports that 600 police will be there issuing tickets or sending people to jail if they're exposing their, um, upper bodies in exchange for beads.

I see this as an affront to liberty. Telling the women of New Orleans to keep themselves covered is like telling the men of the Jersey Shore that hair should not be spiked, and skin should not be tanned. It's like telling the people of Philadelphia that they need to be demure and polite in the presence of rival sports teams.

Cities, like people, have to be themselves, and this is a time to celebrate and embrace freedom. I think it's our duty as Americans to let the ladies at the parade show their appreciation in that special New Orleans way.

I am still happy for the people of New Orleans, of course, but I didn't expect that their glorious Super Bowl triumph would come at the expense of our treasured personal freedoms. If you'd still like to watch the festivities, you can do so by clicking right here, starting at 5 p.m. New Orleans time.

Move over Hawkeye, Super Bowl XLIV is now the most-watched television program in history. Sunday's game between the New Orleans Saints and Indianapolis Colts drew 106.5 million viewers, barely topping the 105.97 million who watched the series finale of "M*A*S*H" in 1983.

It's the first time a sporting event in the United States has surpassed 100 million viewers. The soaring popularity of the NFL, Peyton Manning(notes), the hype around the Saints as an inspiration to New Orleans, the first Super Bowl between No. 1 seeds since 1993 and the Mid-Atlantic blizzard combined to give the league its highest viewership of all time. Just imagine if Brett Favre(notes) had been playing.

A higher percentage of Americans watched the final episode of "M*A*S*H" 27 years ago (approximately 45 percent of the population), but that was also in an era when cable was at its infancy and most people had just three networks from which to choose. Super Bowl XLIV had to go up against "Puppy Bowl," for pete's sake.

Nielsen Co. reports that 153.4 million people watched at least part of the game, up from 151.6 million last year. In a television industry defined by declining viewership, the fact that the NFL's biggest game has done a better rating in each of the past five years is somewhat stunning. The audience is supposed to be getting more fragmented, not setting records.

The presence of Peyton Manning was a huge force in the staggering numbers, but don't underestimate the role of the weekend blizzard. Record-setting snow totals in the Mid-Atlantic kept people snowbound and likely increased the number of TVs tuned into the game. Amazingly, Super Bowl XLIV did a better rating in D.C. (56.0) than it did in Indianapolis (54.2).

Peyton Manning(notes) didn't shake hands with New Orleans Saints players after his Indianapolis Colts lost 31-17 in Super Bowl XLIV. Apparently some think this is a sign of poor sportsmanship from the NFL's greatest player. It's not.

Walking off the field without congratulating Drew Brees(notes) may go against our misguided notion of what sportsmanship should be, but it wasn't at all disrespectful or bitter. It shows how much Peyton Manning wanted to win the game. And who can argue about that? 

LeBron James was caught up in a similar controversy during the NBA playoffs last year and the same thing that was true then is true now: A perfunctory handshake doesn't make someone a good sport. It either makes them indifferent to the game's result or a good actor. What would people have preferred Peyton and LeBron do, laugh off the loss with apathy and treat the victors to dinner after? This isn't Little League.

The only time I question my sports fandom is when the players I'm rooting for seem to care less about the result than I do. I don't want to see my team's quarterback laughing on the sideline while losing a big game. If I care so much, why shouldn't the players?

"It's just a job for these guys," is a familiar refrain. The natural response to that is the great ones make their job their passion. Hall of Fames don't tend to include guys who can't care. The desire to win is what sustains greatness. You think Michael Jordan was hugging Isiah Thomas after losses in the 1980s? Or that Larry Bird stayed on the court to congratulate Kareem? Ted Williams and Joe DiMaggio weren't going out for drinks after the Yankees beat the Red Sox. The great ones are competitors and competitors can't flip a switch immediately after a devastating loss and act like it didn't matter.

Being a good sportsman is playing fair, respecting the game and giving credit after to an opponent. Manning did all those things Sunday. In his postgame press conference he said of his quick exit:

"I certainly know how it was three years ago when we won. There's not much consolation for the guys who didn't win. There's the stage being set up and the celebration. It's time for the Saints to celebrate. It's their field."

That's probably a tad disingenuous, but no more than it would have been if Peyton had walked over to congratulate Drew Brees.

For the record, Peyton did call Brees later in the night. Said the Saints quarterback: "Peyton's a class guy." If the man who was supposedly snubbed thinks so, that's enough for me.

Other popular Yahoo! Sports stories:
• All in favor of a Super Bowl national holiday?
• The big rule change the NFL is considering
• Watch: Best and worst of the Super Bowl ads

I'd like to add one more name to the list of "could-have-been" MVPs: Tracy Porter's(notes) barber.

I'm going to go ahead and succumb to hyperbole and call it the greatest Super Bowl haircut of all time. He showed up for the game Sunday with an image of the Superdome shaved into the back of his dome, surrounded by the Lombardi trophy and "SB44." Here are a couple of looks:

Notice the guy to on the left, staring intently. Yeah, I think you should be jealous, buddy.

Here's a look at the SB on the other side. And the coup de grace, courtesy of Larry Brown Sports:

It's not the first time Porter's barber has worked some magic, either. In the NFC Championship game, where his interception of Brett Favre(notes) won the day for the Saints, he went with a Pac-man theme.

Inky, Pinky, Blinky and Clyde weren't going to keep Porter from being this year's unofficial postseason MVP. It's been a miraculous two weeks for the Saints cornerback, and he and his barber should be proud.

You shouldn't have to work today.

You shouldn't even have to get out of bed. This should be a day where you can sleep in, sleep off the effects of all the "soda" you drank yesterday, reflect on the Saints as the representation of the best in football and just keep reloading Shutdown Corner all day long.

Today should be a national holiday.

What else brings Americans together like the Super Bowl? One hundred million people all did the same thing yesterday. When does that ever happen? As a nation, what else do we universally agree on, quite like the fact that we should all sit down, eat ridiculous foods and watch a football game? We can barely get the same number of people to vote in a presidential election.

The way we come together for this thing is unbelievable, and that shouldn't go unrecognized. This is a shared experience that binds us as a nation. When we all agree that it's time to party, we should all also agree that it's worth a day of rest afterwards.

I don't even care what we call it. If the government is hesitant to create a new national holiday for the Super Bowl, pick some president or some other famous American, and name it after them. Call it Jimmy Carter Day, Denzel Washington Day, Sully Sullenberger Day, Philip Rivers(notes) Day or Joey Buttafuoco Day, for all I care. Just as long as it happens the Monday after the Super Bowl, and everyone gets that day off of work.

Of course, I'm not the first to advance this idea. SuperBowlMonday.com advocates pretty heavily for it, and they've got a petition you can sign, as well as addresses at which you can write your local Senators and Congressmen. Look into that.

We've already got the Indianapolis public school system arguing over what to do on the Monday after the Super Bowl. And anyone in New Orleans who makes it in to work on time tomorrow has let their city down. Let's just take all the uncertainty out of the equation and let people do what they want.

Other popular Yahoo! stories:
• New Orleans parties after team wins Super Bowl
• 'Twilight' star will get super hero treatment
• Watch: Best and worst of Super Bowl ads

It's not Matt Stover's(notes) fault he's Matt Stover. So you can't blame the Indianapolis Colts kicker for missing a 51-yard field goal early in the fourth quarter of Super Bowl XLIV. The 42-year-old, who Sunday became the oldest player ever to suit up in the NFL's biggest game, had kicked only one field goal longer than 50 yards since 2002. For his career, Stover is just 13 for 32 from 50-plus, and most of those attempts took place when Stover was in his kicking prime. 

Stover was cut at the end of last season by the Baltimore Ravens in large part because of his diminished long-range skills. And now, on the biggest stage in sports, a team with Peyton Manning(notes) was putting its destiny on the foot of a man old enough to actually remember when the band playing halftime was actually revelant?

Stover never should have been put in that situation. There was little doubt that his 51-yard try, which would have given Indy a 20-16 lead with 10 minutes remaining in the game, would fail. He doesn't have the leg for such kicks anymore. He never did. Stover was, and is, an excellent kicker from inside 49 yards. For his career, he's 86 percent from that distance. Once he gets over 50 yards though, that percentage drops to 40 percent. Since 2004 he's only attempted four kicks from beyond 50. Those kicks aren't part of his game.

It's not a knock on him to say this any more than it is to say that Joe Montana wasn't as good as Brett Favre(notes) because he didn't throw it as hard. Stover is an accurate kicker, not one with long range. This isn't an insult, but a fact. To ask him to be a kicker he's not was the real error, not the inevitable missed kick (which fluttered wide left and barely made it to the back of the end zone).

But that's basically what Jim Caldwell and Peyton Manning did. Facing a third-and-11 from the New Orleans 33-yard line, Manning went no huddle and threw a deep pass to Austin Collie(notes) that fell incomplete. The Colts were playing for the first down and to extend the drive. The decision failed.

In retrospect it's easy to say the Colts should have thrown a short pass and taken a chunk out of the 11 yards in order to give Stover a more palatable 43-yard field goal. That's probably what I would have done. But playing it safe isn't how the Colts entered the Super Bowl with an undefeated record this season in games that meant something. Peyton is a risk-taker, much like Saints coach Sean Payton (witness the onside kick to start the second half.) He didn't care that Stover would have to kick a 51-yarder because he didn't think Stover would have to do it in the first place. The plan wasn't to throw an incompletion, it was to get a first down with Collie and only bring Stover out to kick the extra point after a touchdown.

That mentality is part of why Peyton and the Colts are so good. But when reality does rear its head, a better decision needs to be made. Letting Stover kick that field goal was essentially the same thing as failing to convert on fourth down. Either run a short play on third down and go for it on fourth, or go for the whole thing on third and punt if it doesn't work out. Settling for a prayer field goal can't be the game plan there. 

After the miss, New Orleans got the ball on its own 41-yard line and nine plays later scored the go-ahead touchdown. A late Peyton Manning interception sealed the game for the Saints. That Tracy Porter(notes) interception will become the signature play of this contest, seen for years on highlight films and remembered as the defining moment. But Matt Stover's miss was just as big ... and completely avoidable.

There's absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Saints quarterback Drew Brees(notes) deserved the Super Bowl MVP award -- his stat line of 32-of-39 for 288 yards and two touchdowns told the story. It was especially impressive considering that the Saints struggled early, and Brees recovered to play masterfully. But football is the ultimate team sport, and there are other Saints players who should go away from the most important game of their lives very proud of their performances. Here are five who might have been the MVP under different circumstances:

Tracy Porter(notes) -- Everyone's wondering why Reggie Wayne(notes) only got five catches in the Super Bowl. Truth was, he was targeted 11 times, more than any other receiver on either team. And Porter, the man most responsible for covering him, put up the game of his life, His outstanding break on the short comeback to Wayne late in the game that led to the interception touchdown was a triumph of football intellect and the will to know one's opponent, but Porter had been playing well all night long.

Jonathan Vilma(notes) -- The Saints' linebacker has played great all year, but he made a play in the fourth quarter that was almost as big as Porter's interception. With 10:51 left in the game and the Colts up 17-16 and rolling from the New Orleans 33-yard line on third-and-11, Peyton Manning(notes) threw over the middle and deep to Austin Collie(notes), But Vilma was there to break up the play that would have been a sure touchdown otherwise. Vilma finished the game with seven solo tackles and two tackles for loss, but that deflection proved his ability to make plays when his team needs them by dropping into coverage ina way that few middle linebackers can.

Courtney Roby(notes) -- What? A special teamer in consideration for the MVP? Well, consider this: The Saints started their average drive at their own 29. The Colts started their drives on average at their own 17. Roby, a backup receiver, had a great deal to do with that -- he averaged 25.5 yards on four kick returns, stopped the return of the Saints' first punt for no gain, and downed the punt with 5:22 left in the first quarter at the Colts' own 4-yard line. In a game as close as this one, special teams can be the deciding factor, and nobody was more important in that department than Roby.

Garrett Hartley(notes) -- And speaking of special teams, what about this kid? Hartley became the first kicker to make three field goals of 40 or more yards in one Super Bowl, and it was his foot that kept the Saints in the game as they were dissecting the Colts' defense.

Pierre Thomas(notes) -- The Saints' prime mover in their running back rotation gained only 30 yards on nine attempts on the ground, but he picked up 55 yards on six receptions, including a third-quarter touchdown in which he seemed to bounce off or go through every Colts defender. That's been his style all season, and it paid off once again.

With 3:12 left in Super Bowl XLIV, the New Orleans Saints were in trouble. They were up, 24-17, on the Indianapolis Colts, but Peyton Manning(notes) was moving the ball with merciless force. On a drive that began at his own 30, Manning had completed four of six passes for 39 yards, and the Colts were looking to hit the red zone. Manning was riddling the Saints with underneath stuff, he had third-and-5 from the New Orleans 31.

Right before the play, CBS' Phil Simms (showing once again his nonpareil ability to whiff mightily on in-game strategy predictions) said, "If I'm the New Orleans Saints, I would not blitz here – I would put the extra men in coverage."

The Colts went with their favorite formation – three-wide, shotgun, single back, with tight end Dallas Clark(notes) tight on one side of the line. The Saints countered with the kind of wide three-man front they'd been running a lot through the Super Bowl, with limited success. And they didn't seem to hold to Mr. Simms' advice, sending four defenders up the offensive right A- and B-gap, putting pressure on Manning in the one place no quarterback likes it – up the middle and in his face.

The Colts went with an interesting route combination on their left side, sending Austin Collie(notes) (17) in motion from outside to in and running inside Reggie Wayne(notes) (87) as Wayne took the out route. The idea was to literally cross up cornerbacks Tracy Porter(notes) (22) and Malcolm Jenkins(notes) (27), but both young defenders stayed in their areas. Jenkins followed Collie inside in a crossing route, and Porter jumped the little comeback route that Wayne ran at the first-down marker for the interception. From there, it was off to the races, and the 74-yard touchdown that put the game away for the Saints.

After a long time of looking somewhat confused against Manning's greatness, the Saints put it all together with the right kind of pressure and mature, disciplined coverage that any quarterback would find tough to deal with. After the game, Porter told the media what the Saints were looking for on the play. "We knew that on third-and-short they stack, and they like the outside release for the slant," Porter said. "It was great film study by me, a great jump and a great play. When I saw my blockers in front of me and only Peyton [Manning] and the offensive linemen left. I cut back and ran it in."

Defensive coordinator Gregg Williams talked about how and why the Saints threw different blitzes at Manning on that drive. "It's kind of a set-up, and that was kind of the thought process of getting it to there. I've talked about the chess game. Anytime you play Peyton, you've got to be two, three, four, five plays down the road. That series of plays, trying to set up the route and hopefully set up the formation that they would call, it kind of fell into our place right there. It's OK if we recognize it. It's not OK if we don't. Tracy Porter did a great job recognizing it, and our three linebackers did a great job of convincing me that the next time we got in that situation to call that pressure. [LB Scott] Shanle, Vilma and [LB Scott' Fujita suggested to me about three or four plays before that to make sure I come back to that pressure on that down and distance again. We were able to do that and Tracy saw that unfolding, he pulled the trigger and made a nice play. Players make plays like that, coaches don't. I made the call, but Tracy made the play."

Saints head coach Sean Payton had this to add about his defense: "In the second half, they played lights-out against a good offense and got the turnover. It was a great team win tonight."

No question about it.

Other popular stories on Yahoo!:
• Verdict on Tim Tebow Super Bowl commercial
• Saints coach makes gutsy call that pays off
• New Orleans parties after team wins Super Bowl
• Watch: Best and worst of Super Bowl ads
• Buy Saints championship merchandise