Dose: Steen gets his Green

James O'Brien
Dose: Steen Machine Reboots
Monday's Dose chronicles the potential awakening of Blues who weren't so hot when Vladimir Tarasenko was tearing it up, including Alexander Steen

If you’re a fantasy hockey owner who shares my belief that contract years often serve as catalysts for career years, then your opportunistic little heart must break a little bit when a prominent player signs a mid-season extension. That heartache might be a little more pronounced thanks to Wednesday’s somewhat-surprising signing of Alexander Steen, as the St. Louis Blues wrapped him up for three years, $17.4 million (a $5.8 million cap hit beginning in 2014-15).

That’s not to say that it’s a dumb move for the Blues or Steen in reality, however.

The Blues, in particular, should be lauded for an absolute bargain. While Steen seems to be playing over his head right now, he’s still been a quality player when healthy. Even if he slows down, this isn’t even a $2.5 million annual raise for a guy who seems primed to be a top-line player for the foreseeable future.

Let’s go deeper on the deal on a number of levels.

For everything NHL, check out Rotoworld's Player News and follow @Rotoworld_ HK+@cyclelikesedins on Twitter.

BLUES MASTERPIECE

With the salary cap shooting up to approximately $71.1 million in 2014-15, Cap Geek estimates that St. Louis will still have $23.46 million in room to work with. That’s absolutely gorgeous considering the fact that the Blues’ core players are wrapped up for the near future. Jay Bouwmeester, Alex Pietrangelo and Kevin Shattenkirk have fairly recent extensions that are beyond cap-friendly considering their production (and for the latter two, potential for greater things). The Blues also don't need to worry about re-signing David Backes ($4.5 million cap hit) until the summer of 2016 and T.J. Oshie ($4.175 million) until the following offseason, giving them an enviable top line alongside Steen that will cost less than $14.5 million for years. How many teams are jealous of the Blues right now?*

Honestly, the more I look at the Blues’ salary structure, the more it reminds me of the Los Angeles Kings’ bargain-laced roster when they won the Stanley Cup. The Kings paid a bit below market for some complimentary pieces (such as Jeff Carter and Mike Richards) while enjoying downright stunning savings on homegrown talent (example: when Quick won the Conn Smythe and Cup, he was carrying just a $1.9 million cap hit).

The Blues have a lot of options thanks to this extra money, although they might not be able to join the ranks of the league’s true big spenders.

That being said, I wouldn’t be shocked if the Blues become a serious trade deadline buyer with this flexibility, which should be scary for their Western Conference rivals since they already have a contender-quality roster.

HA-LACKING A FEW ANSWERS

The Blues find themselves in an interesting situation in one area, though: goaltending.

Those savings could evaporate if the team decides to follow the league’s lead by giving Jaroslav Halak an enormous contract. If I were GM Doug Armstrong, I’d note the fact that Halak has 16 wins despite having the save percentage of a good backup (.908).

It’s clear to me that the Blues also share the Kings’ distinction of providing support that can make a bad goalie average, a good goalie look great and so on. So why not look for undervalued bargains? Instead of going after an expensive guy like Ryan Miller, I’d be tempted to pry James Reimer away and sign him to an affordable contract extension (or do the same with other underappreciated netminders such as Jonas Hiller).

Both Halak and Brian Elliott are in contract years, so it’s an interesting situation to watch. The Blues could very well blow some of their competitive advantage by signing one or both of those guys for more than they need to spend, but honestly, the Blues still would probably boast enviable savings even if they did so.

Beyond the goalies, the Blues have a few other noteworthy decisions to make, although the only guy I'd describe as a core piece needing a deal is Jaden Schwartz. As an RFA, he could come cheap, especially since the team's internal ceiling is Pietrangelo's more-than-reasonable $6.5 million cap hit. Derek Roy could be an interesting (if less than essential) consideration, especially since he's been heating up lately.

STEEN MACHINE

Before I get to a more fun thought experiment on contract extensions, I thought I’d ponder what might be expected of Steen.

One thing that must be addressed is luck. Plenty of studies have shown that players who enjoy unusually high shooting percentages tend to regress in future seasons. Steen is connecting on 19.6 percent of his shots, a significant uptick from his career 9.9 mark.

If he was connecting on 9.9 percent of his 112 shots instead of 19.6, he’d have about 11 goals instead of his current 22. One cannot get around the fact that while he’s been a solid goal producer in his career - thanks to this season, he's now crossed the 20-goal barrier three times - he's never scored more than 24 goals (2009-10) in a single season.

Of a larger concern to many, he's only eclipsed 80+ games played twice in 10 seasons coming into this year. You can throw out the lockout-shortened 2012-13 season (he missed eight of 48 games), but the trend is still worrisome: he's been limited to 20, 40, 43, 61 and 68 games played before. That's a worry for the Blues as well as keeper league owners.

Many argue that injury proneness is a myth, so perhaps Steen will have more luck in the health department going forward like he has in finding his shot lately?

This is not to say that Steen is a lacking performer, especially since the Blues signed him to such an affordable deal (which I believe will put less pressure on him big picture). Ignoring the 2008-09 season when he was traded from Toronto,** Steen has clocked in around the .65 to .71 point range. If he stayed healthy but reverted back to his old production, people could expect between 53-58 points each season.

I'd guess he's probably more likely to take this jump as a minor breakthrough and clock in at anywhere between 60-70 points each season. Let's not forget that he's getting more ice time than ever with the best linemates he's seen in his career ... and the Blues have every motivation to keep him in a prominent role now. Still, I'm not so sure I'd forecast point-per-game seasons going forward. Luckily, the Blues don't at least need to be that dependent on him, but that depends on how they approach things.

EXTENSION EFFECTS

I’ve lamented in-season extensions, but how have those prominent players fared before and after such deals? Let’s take a look:

Steen: Signed on Dec. 18 - Before: 22 goals, 36 points in 33 games played; After: ?

Phil Kessel: Signed before the season kicked off, has 32 points in 36 games. That's a slight drop from his last two seasons, when he averaged a point-per-game. Still, his .89 mark this season at least tops his career average of .76

Daniel Sedin: Signed on Nov. 1; Before (October): six goals, nine assists for 15 points in 15 GP; After (Nov. 1 - current): five goals, 12 assists for 17 points in 21 GP

Henrik Sedin: Signed on Nov. 1; Before (October): three goals, 15 assists for 18 points in 15 GP; After (Nov. 1 - today): six goals, eight assists for 14 points in 21 games

(Interesting that Henrik saw more of a drop-off.)

And just for fun, Henrik Lundqvist: Signed on Dec. 4 (note: he conveniently didn’t play for a stretch between the end of November and his December signing, so the slit stats do the trick here); Before: 3-5-0 with .908 save percentage and 2.84 GAA in October, 5-6-0 with .924 save percentage in November ; After (December): 2-3-2, .883 save percentage and 3.31 GAA

There really isn’t enough of a sample size to draw dramatic conclusions from these post-extension looks, although it’s noteworthy that everyone saw at least a slight dip in production. As great as Kessel is, for instance, I can’t help but wonder if he’d be even better with his livelihood on the line this season.

After the jump: Jagr’s latest bit of history-making and some other very brief bits

* - You think the Edmonton Oilers would trade places with the Blues in a heartbeat or what? The Oilers are seemingly paying everyone $6 million per year before they even appear in a postseason game …

** Too soon, I know, Leafs fans.

NEW JERSEY 5, OTTAWA 2

-- So, Jaromir Jagr made some more history on Wednesday. His 693rd goal put him at eighth place all-time, moving Steve Yzerman to ninth (692). He's now one goal away from tying Mark Messier for seventh all-time. He might struggle to move to the sixth spot (Mike Gartner, 708 goals) this season, but let's crunch the numbers. He has 12 goals in 35 games so far, so that gives him a .34 per game average. If he plays in all 47 of the Devils' remaining games - a big if at his age, mind you - he'll score about 16 more. Interestingly, that would be the exact pace he'd need to generate to pass Gartner. I don't see it happening, but who knows?

His beautiful power-play goal gave him an NHL record 122 game-winning goals, by the way. Normally, I'd devote this column to Jagr, but with Messier just a goal away and Steen's contract extension presenting its own big news, I thought it could wait. Eventually, I'll dive deep into that, though.

-- Damien Brunner is absolutely on fire lately, with four goals and one assist in his last five games. Amusingly, his only goalless and pointless game came when he fired six SOG as opposed to the two and three he generated while scoring. He's not the steadiest of scorers, but when he's hot, he can produce at an impressive clip. He's at least worth watching, if not worthy of a short-term pickup.

-- Martin Brodeur is heating up again, with three wins in his last four appearances. He's been especially sharp during his personal two-game winning streak, only allowing two goals on 58 shots.

-- You could do worse than watch-listing Eric Gelinas, who has three points in his last two games and has generally played a decent role with the Devils (though his time on ice has actually been limited the last three games).

-- It might be time for Ottawa to go back to Craig Anderson more often. Robin Lehner has now lost six of his last seven decisions (with one relief appearance).

-- The Senators might be tired of waiting for Milan Michalek to break through. While he scored a goal last night, he has a -4 rating and just three SOG in his last four games. That goal represents his only point during that span. Overall, he has a hideous -19 rating.

PITTSBURGH 4, RANGERS 3 (SO)

-- Henrik Lundqvist took a big bump from Chris Kunitz and appeared to suffer some neck pain. He stayed in through the rest of that overtime period and played in the shootout, so hopefully that’s a sign that he isn’t dealing with anything significant.

-- It's interesting that Brandon Sutter has one more goal than Pascal Dupuis so far this season. Sutter's a stride or two behind true fantasy relevance, but he's been a nice asset considering the fact that the Penguins were backed into a corner with the Jordan Staal trade.

-- Carl Hagelin is a nice player in reality, but that doesn't seem to translate into fantasy enough for a recommendation.

-- Undersized forward Mats Zuccarello is probably a little short of roster-worthy, too, but he's showing he at least belongs in the NHL.

-- I still think the Rangers can turn things around, although it might not be pretty.

For a full list of injuries and suspensions click here.