Celtics bounce back to keep Nets winless

Preview | Box Score | Recap
  • Print

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (AP)—Boston’s Big Three against New Jersey’s Great Eight had the look of a mismatch.

Instead, the Celtics had to work hard to keep the injury-decimated Nets winless.

Rajon Rondo(notes) and Paul Pierce(notes) each scored 16 points, and Boston bounced back from its first loss of the season with an 86-76 victory Saturday night.

It was a struggle though, as the Celtics could never pull away from a Nets team that barely had enough players to start a game.

“I didn’t think we had a lot in the tank. I could see that, that’s why I sat our starters long stretches today,” Boston coach Doc Rivers said. “I was just trying to milk the game as long as I could get it and then play at the end, and we had enough to win.”

Ray Allen(notes) came alive after three dismal quarters to score eight of his 12 points in the fourth quarter for the Celtics (7-1), who lost 110-103 to Phoenix on Friday night, allowing 20 more points than in any previous game.

Their defense was back Saturday—and it needed to be, because the Celtics couldn’t shoot for most of the night. Boston finished with an NBA season-high 20 steals, five by Rondo, scoring 19 points off New Jersey’s 24 turnovers.

Kevin Garnett(notes) shot 3 of 13 but added nine points and 13 rebounds for the Celtics, who beat the Nets for the 10th straight time, their longest winning streak in the series since claiming 11 in a row from 1980-82.

“We expect that short-handed guys are going to come out and play hard. We didn’t take them for granted, they just played hard and executed,” Pierce said. “We’re playing a team that’s desperate. They haven’t won. They’ve got everything against them.”

Brook Lopez(notes), the only regular starter available, scored 23 points, and Rafer Alston(notes) had 20 for the Nets (0-7), who likely ran out of gas in the fourth quarter while playing with only eight players.

“Our theme going in was ‘none of us is strong as all of us’ and it literally come to fruition. In a seven-game stretch, go figure,” Nets coach Lawrence Frank said. “Our guys got a great deal of pride and they’re trying to win. It’s a credit to the character in that locker room.”

Starting forward Chris Douglas-Roberts(notes) tested positive for swine flu and Courtney Lee(notes) has a strained left groin, leaving the Nets with the NBA minimum amount of players in uniform.

“Well, we’re down to the great eight,” Frank said before the game.

That was good enough for 3 1/2 quarters until Allen, who was 1 of 7 through three periods, knocked down a pair of jumpers for an 80-72 lead with 4:09 to play.

“I think we got good looks,” Allen said. “In our last couple of games we’ve been getting good looks and we haven’t been knocking them down. It’s just building ourselves into our rhythm throughout the course of the season.

The Nets scored the first five points and led by as much as eight before the Celtics tied it at 18 after one. Neither team had any flow in the first half, with the Nets committing 15 turnovers but Boston converting them into only six points.

Rivers looked disgusted by some of his team’s sloppy plays, including one long pass attempt by Rondo that resembled a tee shot getting caught in the wind, hooking left until it flew out of bounds and landed by the Boston bench.

Josh Boone’s(notes) layup gave New Jersey a 40-39 lead at halftime.

The Celtics seemed to be seizing the game in the third, when two straight layups by Rondo after Boston steals made it 52-45. Garnett’s three-point player later gave the Celtics an eight-point advantage, but they stalled again and the Nets rallied for a 61-59 heading to the fourth.

“We were right there,” Lopez said. “We all showed we can be competitive.”

Garnett and Allen were a combined 3 of 18 through three.

NOTES: The Celtics were without reserve Marquis Daniels(notes), who was excused for personal reasons. … The teams entered as the NBA’s best and worst in scoring differential. Boston was plus-14.7, while the Nets were minus-12.1. … Boston has won seven straight in New Jersey.

Updated Nov 7, 11:08 pm EST
digg del.icio.us
more

Next Opponents

New Jersey at Denver

Tue Nov 24, 2009, 9:00 pm EST

Boston vs Philadelphia

Wed Nov 25, 2009, 7:30 pm EST

57 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. GO BACK TO IRELAND STUPID BOSTON KELTICS
    57. Posted by GO BACK TO IRELAND STUPID BOSTON KELTICS Wed Nov 11 5:42am EST

    Report Abuse

    why do people say seltics, its pronounced KELTICS! from ireland. REMEMBER KELTIC WARRIORS. CELTICS DOESNT MAKE sense
  2. Jose
    56. Posted by Jose Mon Nov 9 1:06pm EST

    Report Abuse

    lakers 6-1 with no gasol and no bynum..imgaine the celtics without perkins or garnett.
  3. Jose
    55. Posted by Jose Mon Nov 9 1:06pm EST

    Report Abuse

    @ Anthony, the Celtics ONLY won the 2008 championship because we had no Bynum, no Ariza, and yall had home court. The Hawks were giving you trouble on the road, the hawks man! the hawks!
  4. <i>kriknav2020</i>
    54. Posted by kriknav2020 Mon Nov 9 9:31am EST

    Report Abuse

    Its amazing that you have this much time to argue about things you have no impact on. Just watch the game and move on.
  5. <i>sofar4ncounting</i>
    52. Posted by sofar4ncounting Mon Nov 9 12:56am EST

    Report Abuse

    Terry Bradshaw.....Wow, preach on, my brother!!!!! Tell it like it is, sorry Jen.....hehehe.....Anthony, "You can throw out all the excuses you want, "the refs were on the Celtics side", "we didn't have Andrew Bynum"... That's all you Celtic fans cry about "We didn't have Garnett", really? We didn't have Bynum and Ariza (at full strength) BUT at least showed up to the big dance.........
  6. Terry Bradshaw
    51. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Mon Nov 9 12:09am EST

    Report Abuse

    Anthony,

    If anything is embarrassing, it's your lack of reading comprehension. I'm not going to continue to argue and state a THIRD time what you didn't read or understand the first and second time. Anyone else (even Celtics fans, except maybe Jen) who reads what I wrote knows what I meant about 15-1 and knows I wasn't referring to last season. Of course the Lakers didn't roll through the playoffs last season. They were challenged by both Houston and Denver and I was happy to see it. They had it way too easy the previous playoffs. They needed to get smacked in the mouth and learn that nothing would be given to them -- and they did. The Lakers team grew up last season and won't be a pushover for anyone. Anthony, I don't expect you to understand or even be able to read what I just said so just ignore it. But you might want to try watching a little more Hooked on Phonics and Sesame Street and a little less Celtics basketball.

    As far as you complaining that Lakers fans are using excuses, I find it ironic since all I've heard from Celtics fans since last year is KG was hurt this or KG was hurt that. Talk about excuses...
  7. GO BACK TO IRELAND STUPID BOSTON KELTICS
    50. Posted by GO BACK TO IRELAND STUPID BOSTON KELTICS Sun Nov 8 11:59pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Paul pierce got stabbed outside a night club back in 09/25/2000. Dave Chapelle made fun of him on Chapelle Show, look it up on YouTube.
  8. boston fever
    49. Posted by boston fever Sun Nov 8 11:57pm EST

    Report Abuse

    @blumoon... how old are you?!?
  9. bluemoon
    48. Posted by bluemoon Sun Nov 8 10:29pm EST

    Report Abuse

    man love perkins he hit it wrong on boston do put themselves into trouble some time by relaxing and not exercuting ,playing fundemental basketball , boston dose take thing for granted some time, that why you gert game like the phonix game where boston lost , or a team like jersy giving boston so much trouble! well i hope bosten can beat the better team this year, if they rexaling like they did with phonix and jersy boston won'r be able to beat the great team trhis year , every has the clevelandf or orland or lakers and duncan and company going to the finals even phonix , boston is not even so to be in the final that what all the sport analist say!
  10. Anthony
    46. Posted by Anthony Sun Nov 8 8:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I hate the Patriots, so your little jab there at the end saying something about them has no effect on me. But as for your lack of your "team knowledge" its just embarrassing. Get your facts straight or don't come at all my friend.
  11. Anthony
    45. Posted by Anthony Sun Nov 8 8:10pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Terry Bradshaw... Your just another bitter Lakers fan. The Celtics rolled through the Lakers in the Finals in 2008 for one reason, the Celtics were just better. The Celtics played all those games and the Lakers flew through the playoffs until they hit a brick wall A.K.A. the Boston Celtics. The Celtics were figured the underdog because they were "old and tired". It wasn't the case, playing all those games just made the Celtics better. You can throw out all the excuses you want, "the refs were on the Celtics side", "we didn't have Andrew Bynum", etc.. But the bottom line is the Celtics won, and they won in a big way. So please keep your excuses to yourself, its a detriment to the game. And still you saying how LA cruised through the playoffs last year at 18-1, thats probably the most retarded statement I've read on the Yahoo! boards and lemme tell ya, thats saying something. If you were a true LA fan and not just a bandwagon jumper then you would understand and know the facts. So enjoy your "Donaghy argument" cause thats all you got and frankly, no one cares.
  12. Terry Bradshaw
    44. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Sun Nov 8 8:07pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Anthony,

    Actually I need to correct myself. The Lakers went 15-1 in 2001, not 18-1. I don't know why I wrote 18-1... I must have been thinking of the 2007-2008 New England Patriots. Sorry, wrong sport.
  13. Terry Bradshaw
    43. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Sun Nov 8 8:03pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Anthony,

    If I was your English teacher, I'd be embarrassed of you. If you actually read what I said and what was said by the person I was responding to (Jen - which I wrote in my message), you'd understand what I was talking about. She said that the Lakers championships from 2000 on were tainted because of what Tim Donaghy said in his book. I said "Hahahah. I'm sure the Lakers really needed help from the refs when they rolled through the playoffs/Finals at 18-1." I was referring to 2001, where the Lakers didn't lose until Game 1 of the NBA Finals against Philadelphia, and promptly went on to win the next four to win the series. My point was that I don't think a team that goes 18-1 through the playoffs needed much help from the refs. Sorry if that went over your head.
  14. Terry Bradshaw
    42. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Sun Nov 8 7:54pm EST

    Report Abuse

    BTW, Jen, some of the referees that Donaghy mentioned intentionally making bad calls in his book included Dick Bavetta, Joe Crawford, Danny Crawford, Bob Delaney, Steve Javie, and Mark Wunderlich. Why is this important? Because all of those guys reffed at least one game in the 2008 Lakers/Celtics Finals including 2 games by Bavetta and Joe Crawford. I wondered why the Celtics shot 28 more free throws in Game 2 that Dan Crawford and Bob Delaney reffed.

    So since these guys are refs that manipulate games, and they reffed the Celtics during their Finals, then the Celtics championship* is tainted too. Hahaha, I love when stupid Celtics fans try to take down another team and end up taking their own team down. Thanks for mentioning Tim Donaghy... if you hadn't, I wouldn't have done the research to see how tainted the Celtics 2008 Championship* actually is. Like you said, you don't have to believe me, Ask Tim Donaghy. Hahahaha. Pure genius.

    So congrats, Celtics - 2008 NBA Finals Champion *
    Enjoy your tainted 17th Championship!

    Hahahaha
  15. Terry Bradshaw
    41. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Sun Nov 8 7:41pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Wow, talk about ignorant (I'm looking at you, JEN). In today's time, how can any American call their own fellow citizens terrorists and compare them to Iranians? That's what I get for trying to have a discussion about SPORTS with people who are too stupid to understand that one is only a game. Jen, do you even know what Tim Donaghey wrote? The only way you would I'm sure is if someone read it to you, as it appears you are too ignorant and stupid to understand and make those statements on your own. So go ahead and celebrate your 17 tainted asterisk championships while you watch the Lakers take over the lead for most NBA championships won... Hahahah.

    Oh, and in case you think your fellow Celtics fans are angels, here are some links to chew on. Maybe you can ask someone to read and explain it to you:

    http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/06/police_arrest_1.html

    http://www.insidehoops.com/blog/?p=1316

    http://www.necn.tv/Boston/Sports/14-arrested-as-Celtics-celebrate-championship-/1213789760.html

    http://www.bpdnews.com/2008/06/unruly_fans_arrested_during_ce_1.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY7wKGpfe4U

    http://multimedia.boston.com/m/20292616/celtics-fan-arrested-after-win-dies-in-hospital.htm?col=en-vid-pod_bcom-ep#q=nba

    Yep, none of your so-called terrorists in Boston at all... Owned again... Hahahaha
  16. boston fever
    40. Posted by boston fever Sun Nov 8 7:39pm EST

    Report Abuse

    good thing celts is back on the winning trail... 2 bumps in the road, man all these pathetic laker fans would have been drinking their heart out and would think of every single stupid posts they can write... oh wait, they actually posts these stupid and ignorant ideas regardless if celts win or lose. i missed the king and so cal...
  17. Anthony
    39. Posted by Anthony Sun Nov 8 6:43pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Terry Bradshaw.... I sure hope your not a LA Lakers fan. Because this is what you said in a previous post..

    "I'm sure the Lakers really needed help from the refs when they rolled through the playoffs/Finals at 18-1, not having to win in 6 and 7 games in every series like a certain recent Finals winner"

    Umm.. If I remember correctly this last playoffs the Lakers won the Finals in 6 games and they went to 7 games with the Houston Rockets. So that means that they lost 5 games combined right there. And you sit there and say they rolled through the playoffs/Finals at 18-1. Get your facts straight buddy. And if your gonna gloat about your team, at least get the facts straight. If I was a Lakers fan, I'd be embarrassed of you.
  18. Anthony
    38. Posted by Anthony Sun Nov 8 6:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The Celtics are still winning though. They've played the most games so far of any team in the league. The Suns beat them because the Suns are a good team. And a team to be reckoned with. But its not like the Celtics were going to go 82-0 or anything. Its the first loss of the season. They were the last team to lose a game. Although it was a close one today, a win is a win. The funny thing is how horrible Boston can play, and yet they still win. Its funny for me, but scary for fans of other teams. Go Celtics
  19. Hello, My Name Is Johnny Cash...
    37. Posted by Hello, My Name Is Johnny Cash... Sun Nov 8 6:25pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Jen, your ignorance is simply mind-blowing. You have the audacity to compare a few little fires in Los Angeles to the complete destruction of an entire nation. To think that my brother died serving idiots like you makes me truly sad. You're so quick to judge an entire fan base on the actions of a few morons. No one attacked you personally(Not really), yet there you are comparing every faithful Lakers fan to a damn terrorist. Calling us gang bangers like every Boston fan is an upstanding citizen...who the hell do you think you are passing judgments around like candy you fu(king twit? You're the same idiot fan that you hate, you have to resort to ridiculous analogies and childish attacks to feel like your representing your team. If you lack the capacity to make an intelligent argument regarding your team, then do your team a favor and shut up. Moron...
  20. joey
    36. Posted by joey Sun Nov 8 5:49pm EST

    Report Abuse

    the Celtics are Soft? Are we on the same planet? Why did the Celtics beat the Lakers in theFinals that last time?? Because the Lakers are pure Hollywood actors , or did you just recently start to watch basketball instead of beach volleyball and missed seeing that last Celtic Championship??
  21. jen
    35. Posted by jen Sun Nov 8 5:45pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Heres another thing for you Faqueers fans to chew on, YOU ARE THE ONLY FANS IN THE NBA THATS EQUIVALENT TO TERRORISTS. You make Al Queda Proud. Your state and city is in financial ruins but yet you tear it down and shred it to pieces making it worse for yourselves. Lakers fans are the DUMBEST piece of sht to be fans. Nothing but gang bangers and...of course Terrorists. They should've held the Faqueers Fraud Cheating Victory parade in Terhan, Iran, that would've made more sense.

    You CHEAT to win Titles, all LAkers titles from 2000 are FRAUDULENT and have big Fat Asteriks* on them. Don't blame me, just ask Tim Donaghey, he'd like to release a book and tell you all about it.
  22. joey
    34. Posted by joey Sun Nov 8 5:42pm EST

    Report Abuse

    does anyone really believe today's Lakers could beat any of the Celtics teams from the 60's??? No Way!! Basket ball teams in the 60's were 7 or 8 deep with All-Stars, unlike today's watered down version of 1 or 2 overpriced crybaby's on each team. The best teams nowadays have 3 allstars and a good cast of extra's. Less teams meant better skilled teams and better quality basketball, better than most of the selfish, all about me basketball played today.
  23. Terry Bradshaw
    33. Posted by Terry Bradshaw Sun Nov 8 3:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Finally, if anyone wants to talk fraud and asterisks, we should be talking about the so-called Celtics dynasty. No one ever mentions how 11 of those 17 titles were won in the late-50's and 60's, when there were 8, 9 and then 10 teams in the league. You have more teams than that in a single conference now! Those titles were won so long ago they weren't even Larry O' Brien trophies... they were Walter A. Brown trophies.

    As far as I'm concerned, any titles before the NBA/ABA merger are insignificant -- they don't have any relevance in the modern era. Just as no one today cares about those old AFL/NFL championships before the Superbowl was created in football. Notice how people only talk about Superbowls won?

    I do find it interesting that while the Celtics won the title the last season before the NBA/ABA merger, it took them 5 seasons to win one after the merger and they've won only 3 more titles after that... with the last two separated by over 20 years of futility. Funny what a little competition does, huh?

    But whatever... we'll play by your rules. Phil Jackson already took Auerbach's victory cigar and record and in a few years the Lakers will have the Celtics record for most NBA titles... And most of them will actually come in a era where there were more than 10 teams playing. ROFL.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Top Performers

 Top Performers
 Boston
R. Rondo Rajon Rondo
8-11,  16 Pts
4 Rebs, 3 Assists
 New Jersey
B. Lopez Brook Lopez
10-16,  23 Pts
7 Rebs, 1 Assists

Team Stat Leaders

Points
Rebounds
Assists

Scoreboard

Saturday, Nov 7