Ankle sprain may sideline Spurs’ Parker for week
SAN ANTONIO (AP)—Spurs guard Tony Parker(notes) is not expected to play Monday against Toronto because of a sore left ankle.
The Spurs said Sunday that Parker’s injury was a mild sprain that could sideline him for a week. Parker rolled his ankle Friday night in the second quarter of a loss at Portland. He did not return to the game.
Parker is averaging a team-high 14.8 points and four assists. He hurt the same ankle at the start of last season and missed three weeks.

Pounding The Rock
155 Comments
1 - 25 of 155
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'd love to swoop up that balla Hill for my fantasy squad, but he doesn't pass worth jack.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And, while Johnny D is obviously insane or trolling to say some of the stuff he has said about Parker and Duncan, he does have one point I like. While I am not a fan of Mark Cuban as a person, I feel that the league (and sports leagues in general) need more owners like him. He is clearly a fan of the team he owns, and its good to have an owner that takes that much pride in his team. While I admittedly don't follow owners that much in the news, it seems like a lot of them just want to put "owner of a professional sports franchise" on their business card.
That being said, I think its completely ridiculous to point out that a "bench point guard" defends Tony Parker better than your starter. All that means is that your starting point guard does not play as good of defense than your bench. All players in the league have strengths and weaknesses. Take Dahntay Jones from the Nuggets last season, he was a defensive specialist. When he was on Kobe in the Western Conference Finals, Kobe was pretty ineffective. Does that mean that Kobe isn't good? On the Suns, Dragic plays better defense than Nash, but that does not mean that someone Dragic can defend is bad. I don't know what the Mavericks looked like last year, so I don't really know who you are referring to, but just because a player does well defending someone doesn't mean that player is not good.
I am a Timberwolves fan first, Celtics fan second (well, KG fan second), and a Suns fan third (I live in Phoenix now), so I am not too big on the Spurs. The Spurs are also my girlfriends' team, so I get to give her a hard time every time they lose. But, I think they are the favorites in the West this year. Lakers are good, but the Spurs are better. You don't see the Spurs take games off like the Lakers did throughout the playoffs last year. You don't see repeated breakdowns in the defense of the Spurs like you do with the Lakers. Granted, the Spurs can't turn on the offense with the flip of a switch like the Lakers can, but I think the Spurs have boosted their roster big time without losing anything critical.
I also don't think the Lakers should have won last year. I think that the Cavaliers should have won, but LeBron lost them the Eastern Conference Finals. I think LeBron is clearly the best player in the game. I watched more Cavs games this year than any other team because it is simply amazing what he can do (and he was on my Fantasy team last year). But, I cannot for the life of me figure out why in several games against the Magic with Howard under the rim with 4 and 5 fouls, LeBron decided to become a jump shooter. What the hell? Take the ball at Howard and make him either foul out or back off and give you the free points. Granted, LeBron is getting much better with his jump shot, but it is still not his best offensive weapon. West had the presence of mind to cut to the hole on every possession, but LeBron was content to hoist up bricks. And I cannot figure out why Mike Brown just let LeBron do that. Call timeout and take control of your team. It is LeBron James' and Mike Brown's fault that the Cavs lost, plain and simple. And because of that they go and pick up Shaq to clog the lanes and make LeBron even more reliant on the jump shot. They never needed someone bigger to deal with Howard, they just needed James to play his game.
Besides that, though, the Lakers were never as "dominant" as the hype or record seemed to suggest they were. Granted, they had the hardest schedule by far, but they didn't seem to show up half the time. The Jazz are not push overs, but the Lakers played lazy against them several games. The Rockets are good, but without Yao and McGrady, the Lakers should not have gone to 7 games against them. The Nuggets I thought were possibly the best team in the West (I still feel that way, but now I think the Spurs could be), but again the Lakers seemed to be sleeping on their feet a lot against them. I didn't really watch the Lakers/Magic series, cause I really don't care for either team. Going 7 games in the playoffs is not necessarily a bad thing. You are going to lose games, opponents will have good games, etc. But, the Lakers just seemed to not show up more frequently than most other teams. The Celtics got beat in a lot of games in their title run two years ago, but there were not many games where I thought they didn't give it their all. The Lakers were a different story this last year. Some may say that shows how good the Lakers really are when they can take days off and still win; I say that shows the Lakers' weakness. The Lakers were lucky they faced teams that could not capitalize on their off-nights. The Spurs, Celtics and Cavaliers would have made them pay severely for taking a night off. The Rockets almost did make them pay, and they were missing two of their star players.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 155