Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:10 am EDT

No less an authority than the
New York Times reporting that our long national nightmare is over. I think
it's safe to let out a collective and much-needed "whew," considering the news.
Oh, you didn't hear?
The NBA and its referees are close to coming to an agreement that would allow them to call NBA games this season and for several years following.
Don't give a rip? Hate the zebras? Constantly upset at their bias? The star-driven calls? Hoping they'd just dump the whole lot of them and start over?
You fool. You absolute fool, who doesn't appear to watch many NBA games with a discerning eye.
Nobody seems to get the fact that, in spite of what that ref with the hair and the whistle and the whole thing just called, that these are the best in the world at a job that is pretty damned impossible. And that inviting a new series of crews into the league for only a moment's token notice would have just been a ridiculous and legitimacy-scarring operation.
It doesn't matter what you think, I've little patience for it. You might not care for the work of the typical NBA referee, but the typical NBA referee is fantastic at his or her job, and no amount of frozen-envelope YouTube clips can chase that away.
And the NBA is just unyieldingly lucky they didn't chase them away during this latest round of "negotiations."
The contrarian in all of you just needs to can it. There was no upside to chasing these refs away. And despite what you think of yourself as a basketball follower, this game wasn't getting any better with these refs on the sideline.
I guarantee you I am more upset and frustrated with their work than the most ardent of referee-bashers -- without the added, lazy, benefit of conspiracy theories, twaddle about the star system (you do realize these stars are faster, better and stronger than other players, right? This leads to them getting fouled more by inferior defenders), or outright homerism.
The block/charge call? It's pathetic. The modern NBA ref has decided that any time a player falls down, a call must result. Doesn't matter if a player falls down by choice, there has to be a call. A block or a charge. Even if there isn't a block or a charge. And these incessant calls? They're ruining the modern game.
The NBA also tried to enforce hand-checking years ago to no avail. Then tried to re-emphasize it. No dice. A few years later, same thing. Finally, 2004-05 rolled around, and they tried it again. Finally, the refs listened. But not after turning off an entire generation of NBA fans who had sat through and passed on watching the hand-check-heavy decade.
Beyond that? Appreciate these guys. Appreciate the job they have to do in what is almost exclusively an opinion-based business, with calls made in a split-second. Over and over and over again.
Appreciate these refs because what they do is a special skill. Most of the time it's not something that can be taught.
And we nearly lost them, for however long.
Kindly appreciate that they'll be back. You know I will.
Now, commence with the idiotic, "the refs be bums" twaddle.
Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Nov 24 2009
Posted Nov 23 2009
Fantasy Insider: Start 'em, Sit 'em Part 2
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
67 Comments
1 - 25 of 67
Report Abuse
But seriously, can they just not make a call every time someone keels over in the paint? It'd be nice if we got some consistency in traveling violations.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
More Tim Duncan laughter in the world?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Now you're saying if we're unhappy with the refs, we're morons.
Been reading How to Win Friends & Influence People?
The only thing I'm going to complain about is the fact that the NBA is not doing a good job bringing new referees into the fold. Guys in their 50's and 60's are refereeing playoff games because why? Old guys can't see as well, can't run as fast, can't hear like they used to. Get some new blood in there, train them up and let's let these old dudes retire.
Report Abuse
Now you're saying if we're unhappy with the refs, we're morons.
Been reading How to Win Friends and Influence People?
The only thing I'm going to complain about is the fact that the NBA is not doing a good job bringing new referees into the fold. Guys in their 50's and 60's are refereeing playoff games because why? Old guys can't see as well, can't run as fast, can't hear like they used to. Get some new blood in there, train them up and let's let these old dudes retire.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I am aware that calling out and insulting fans is a good way to draw attention to yourself. I just don't think that it's necessary to get your point across when you have been on this blog for so long.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Plus this article reads like a [profane] schizo wrote it. First we have you trying to distance yourself from all the "fans" who are all moron's for bashing the ref's because their job is extremely difficult and they do a fantastic job. Then it becomes nobody is more upset about the quality of work recently than you and you cannot sympathize more with the "fans", finally you say that being a NBA ref is not a skill you can teach, but something you are born with... Jesus Christ man, pick an angle and stick with it, and NO NBA ref's learned a skill and are now applying what they learned as a career, saying that being a NBA Ref requires a special skill that only few posses is flat out retarded
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 67