Thu Jul 01 01:00pm PDT
Five weeks into the start of next season, John Salmons(notes) will turn 31 years old. Last year, taking a step down from what was a career year in 2008-09, he rounded out to about an above-average player for the Chicago Bulls and Milwaukee Bucks; and Milwaukee just agreed to re-sign him to a deal that will pay Salmons $39 million over five seasons.
This has been a good day for NBA basketball players.
This isn't an outrageous deal. John Salmons making around $8 million in 2015 (David Aldridge, who first reported the deal, says that the Bucks will have a buyout option in the final season; but this would still mean Milwaukee sends money Salmons' way), yeah, that's pretty bad. But this isn't the worst free- agent signing we saw Thursday. But couldn't the Bucks, who clearly appreciate what Salmons brings to the table, have waited a bit? Made John, perhaps, a bit more tradeable near the end of his contract?
Now, we don't know how the deal is put together. It could be front-loaded (which would leave Salmons still pretty overpaid initially, in my book), with the numbers dwindling from next season until 2015, but we're just a day and a half into negotiating time. And even with all the massive contracts floating around, couldn't we just get a bit of patience?
Because Salmons is a wing player. He depends on his quickness and just enough hops to get free to work shots over the tops of defenders. And shooting guards like Salmons just don't age well. In fact, by the time they hit 33 or so, they look pretty awful. And Salmons, for the first half of his first half of 2009-10, looked absolutely terrible with Chicago. Anyone who was watching closely surely saw that as a sign of things to come, even if the 30-year-old picked it up as the year moved along.
And the fear, to me, is that you get 1 1/2 years (and that's a bit of a stretch, based on his early play in Chicago last season) of Salmons sustaining this production at age 31, before the drop-off. And you would then pay four years and around $32 million for the right to sponsor that drop-off, with a contract that seems pretty untradeable.
The Bucks are shooting to sustain, though. They're done with that brief grab at going young, and are moving ahead with a (hopefully) healthy Andrew Bogut(notes) leading the way. Brandon Jennings(notes) will be a year older and (again, hopefully) a lot better from the field in his second year. Corey Maggette(notes) will help the Bucks (last in the NBA in 2009-10 at earning whistles) get to the line more. And Drew Gooden(notes) is a master at turning loose balls and broken plays (Milwaukee had a lot of those, last season) into high-percentage scores.
And Salmons can fit in, here. He can score on plucky drives, shoot from the perimeter, and make the sound pass. His defense has fallen off a bit, but he can still lock down now and again, and he's a good locker room guy.
Five years, nearly $40 million, though. Woof. We'll see how this works.
Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by Trey Kerby. Email him and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Sep 6 2010
Posted Sep 6 2010
Posted Sep 6 2010
Edited By MJD
Edited By 'Duk
Edited By Trey Kerby
Edited By Greg Wyshynski
Edited By Matt Hinton
Edited By Jeff Eisenberg
Edited By Jay Busbee
Edited By Jay Busbee
Edited By Steve Cofield
Edited By Chris Chase
Edited By Chris Chase
Edited By Brooks Peck
Edited By Andy Behrens
Edited By Cameron Smith
Edited By Mark J. Miller
30 Comments
1 - 25 of 30
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Joe Johnson is a nice player but $119 Million?
Rudy Gay $96 Million? For Memphis? when have they been in the Playoffs.
I know Black Folks did not get thier 40 Acres and a mule but this is rediculous.
I though we were in a recession?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
FEAR THE DEER ANOTHER YEAR!!
Report Abuse
John Salmons: 30 years old, 20 ppg w/ Bucks (about 17ppg over same period) and 8 mil per year...
Looks like a good deal for Mil-town to me...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Anywho, this is great news because I, too, would like to say good-bye to Redd. This will help do that.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I would have prefered a Salmons deal around the $26m4 year mark, front loaded to read $8m, $7m, $6m, with the 4th a team option for $5m. Any other off-season, this would have happened...this off-season...too much money and hype around the league.
Bucks shooting for Win-now strategy.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
My only worry is if all these guys can play well together. The Bucks got a lot of production out of a very lowly roster that beginning of last season no one expected much from. Now that they're stacked, who gets the ball? It still has to go through BJ3 and Bogut. One of their biggest problems last year was getting to the hoop, getting to the line, and finishing around the rim. They should be able to address all those concerns with the guys they've brought in (Sanders looks like he could be a beast, btw). Hammond is a very smart guy. I think keeping Ridnour should be next on the docket. Other than that, I'm very satisfied with what they've done.
The Bucks needed some quality vets who can score, they already had a good young nucleus that played well together and was developing. Now they should have it all. I see no reason they can't finish in the top 5 in the east again (would've if Bogut didn't get hurt), possibly top 4 regardless of who goes where in the big free agent blow-out. Yes, one or two teams are going to walk away with LBJ, Wade, Bosh, and Amare or maybe two or three, but I'd compare the Bucks depth to the Celtics from last season. They just have waves of guys they can send at you. Very exciting.
Report Abuse
There's a reason the Bucks haven't won jack since Kareem.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 30