Ball Don't Lie - NBA

Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:44 pm EDT

Luol Deng got the money

Whether you're a Bulls fan, and have 11-year old clips of Matt Steigenga throwing down an alley-oop on DVD in your living room (not that I'm familiar with these sorts of sorts), or a typical NBA observer, Luol Deng's contract extension seems pretty odd at first glance.

The Bulls forward was offered a five-year, 57.5 million dollar extension last fall, and decided to pass, preferring to work his way through the open market as a restricted free agent this summer. Deng proceeded to have a pretty miserable year, then he encountered an open market that really wasn't that open once the 76ers "settled" on Elton Brand, and the Bulls responded by handing the 23 year-old a six-year, 80 million dollar deal.

Something doesn't seem right. Until you start to chip away.

The 80 million quid mark only works its way to fruition once a batch of what they're calling "team-based incentives" comes into play. So, if the Bulls make or even win the NBA Finals next year, or the year after, then Deng might see his contract bump up a bit. Otherwise, it's a 71 million dollar deal, right in line with the 12 million dollar average we've seen players from the 2004 and 2005 Draft class get this summer. The incentives do partially count as a cap hold for the Bulls starting in the middle of the next offseason, but that hardly matters to a team that is well over the salary cap.

So, on the surface, a young team with good players decided to hand a player a contract that falls right in line with his value on the open market, even if he isn't trying to secure a contract in the open market, and it makes complete and total sense, right? Well, because this is the NBA, and these are the Bulls ... no.

1). Why give the guy one more year and almost 14 more million dollars?

Because the Bulls can. It doesn't make sense, and they were bidding against themselves, but Chicago went ahead with it anyway because team owner Jerry Reinsdorf likes Luol Deng. And because Reinsdorf is a basketball genius, it just makes sense.

2). Reinsdorf is the owner, right?

Right. Sarcasm doesn't always work on the internet. That's why there are so many fights.

John Paxson is the GM, but Reinsdorf decided that he wanted to negotiate this deal, just because he can.

3). Isn't Reinsdorf incredibly cheap?

Yes, and no. Since Michael Jordan left the team in 1999, the Bulls have been the league's most profitable franchise by far. The team doesn't rake in money comparable to the Lakers or Knicks, but they don't spend the same amount of money either. The team is swimming in profits.

But you never hear about it. Mainly because the team always seems to be over the cap, they always seem to be spending money while trading for (Jalen Rose), signing people to (Ben Wallace) or extending (Deng, Tyson Chandler, Kirk Hinrich) big contracts. The team throws off the scent of a spend-to-win franchise, but that isn't really the case.

You watch. The team has about seven and a half million dollars to spend this summer before it hits the luxury tax, and though Ben Gordon is worth about eight million a year, the team will find a way to worm its way out of sending money to the team's leading scorer and hardest worker.

They'll mention something about making Ben a competitive offer (because, with no teams actually making offers for Gordon's services, the league's average salary or the Qualifying Offer is, technically, "a competitive offer"), before signing him to the QO and telling their fans all about how much money they have invested in their backcourt.

The rookie salary scale was the best thing to ever happen to the Bulls, because they can hold potential and promise in your face while keeping eight figure contracts at arm's length, and by the time you've talked yourself into believing that the lottery-derived hotshot from four years ago has too many holes to retain, the Bulls have taken advantage, moved on, and picked up another shiny piece (Derrick Rose!) for you to get distracted with.

4). This makes no sense. The team is near the luxury tax. The Bulls just gave Deng nearly 12 million a year without really having to.

Yeah, but this is where they get you! Black helicopters!

Seriously, Reinsdorf has his guys. He has players he likes, and players he doesn't, production be damned.

The Bulls aren't his team. The Chicago White Sox are, he'll mortgage whatever it takes to get the Sox in the playoffs, but the Bulls are an on-again/off-again fancy. He takes interest in them every so often, and doesn't want anything to do with paying the luxury tax even if it would put them in place to win a championship.

And he has his guys. Gordon, Tyrus Thomas, Joakim Noah probably ... he doesn't mind it when his basketball braintrust drafts these sorts, but he doesn't want to be the one handing eight-figure a year contracts to them. Hinrich, Deng, Chandler, Andres Nocioni ... those are his guys. Scrappers. Plucky sorts. Reinsdorf is just fine with a second round exit with a team that makes him money and reminds him of the 1970 New York Knicks. And Deng, with that Bill Bradley-esque baseline jumper, fits right into his wheelhouse.

Gordon, even though he practically lives at the team's workout facility, isn't as lucky. And because the Bulls blind you with another lottery pick and fool you with Deng's contract, they can explain away passing on extending deals for other contributors, telling you that, "at the end of the day, we just need to retain flexibility," while you nod and wonder what number Derrick Rose is going to wear.

5). Number one, by the way.

Yeah, I know. I was hoping he'd go for 25, the Benji Wilson tribute, but that's how it goes.

6). And if the Bulls re-sign Gordon to a sizeable deal? If they pay the luxury tax?

I will dance to this song, repeatedly. I will warm myself thinking about the possibility of the Bulls showcasing an offense that is above average in offensive efficiency, at least by the year 2011.

And I will come on here and offer a mea culpa. But only if they pay the luxury tax.

7). Isn't this supposed to be a post about Luol Deng?

Yes. He's 23. He's awesome. He had a fluke year last year, and should be more than effective this season. The comparisons to players like Tayshaun Prince make no sense, mainly because Prince was about halfway through his rookie season by the time he was Deng's age, hardly a world-beater, and Deng seems a year or two away from making the All-Star team. This contract will take Luol right through his prime, and the guy is just a year removed from averaging about 19 and 7 at age 21. That's incredibly impressive.

It just smacks of a smokescreen, if not for Gordon, then for the other players that could come down the pike. There were reasonable arguments for Chicago to pass on retaining the lottery selections they accrued from 1999 to 2002 (all seven, !, of them), but this is a new batch, a new breed, and the worry is that Chicago threw a few extra million toward Luol to allow itself the chance to explain away retaining their other youngsters at a non-rookie scale rate.

I could be wrong. I hope I'm wrong. Here's hoping the Bulls make a fool of me.

digg delicious
more

20 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. qwerty
    1. Posted by qwerty Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bob dole!
  2. denlahoya
    2. Posted by denlahoya Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:41 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Don't they make them hold a prisoner # plate in Chicago when they take a mug shot?
  3. fairenough77
    3. Posted by fairenough77 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:58 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't think Rose, Gordon, Deng, Tyrus and Noah can be emblazoned with Championship Five, which is why I'm not sure I want to give Gordon what he's looking for. So in basketball terms, Gordon shouldn't get that deal.
    But you've convinced me that the basketball argument pales in comparison to justice. So give BG his due, I say.
  4. KD
    4. Posted by KD Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Bulls were 26th in offense last year, and you take away their leading scorer? No way I'd Bob Dole that.
  5. nja700
    5. Posted by nja700 Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    On the bright side, you at least have a high-ceiling stud locked up for a reasonable price. And you've got some good problems to have relative to other teams in the league, not to mention the balance of age and talent positionally. It's young teams like the Bulls and Blazers that make being a fan of the rebuilding T-Wolves that much more depressing.
  6. Alex
    6. Posted by Alex Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:48 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    hi KD, love the columns, and i agree ben is worth $8M and that reinsdorf is holding them back; but the problem is that you can't claim we're being cheap if we have to sign ben for around $11M and up (his asking price). he's an undersized 2 guard who's only real skill is scoring. and he's streaky at that, and on 60% of his crunchtime last possessions, he either is blocked, loses the ball, or falls down (and then loses the ball). if he won't take anything less than $11M, i'd rather sign a true star for a few more mill a year (ie baron at 13 and brand at 16 both seem reasonable). especially when we already have rose and kirk signed for the next few yearrs.
  7. that guy
    7. Posted by that guy Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:21 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    BG make work the hardest, but he only seems to work on his jumper. No matter how much he scores, the other team scores more when he's on the court. And he doesn't work on his ball handling either. So I don't get all the tears when a BG/Rose backcourt will be even more defensively challenged... BG for $8 or even $9 mil would be fine, but he turned down more last year, why is he all of a sudden going to take it now?
  8. mizzletazzle
    8. Posted by mizzletazzle Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Actually, that guy, that's not true. Gorden had the best plus/minus numbers of any member of the bulls backcourt last year--the year before that, too, I believe. And I don't think it was really close, either.
  9. Son
    9. Posted by Son Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    too bad they spent all that money on deng. they should have just said 10 million take it or leave it and deng would have no choice but get mid-level money in europe.
  10. Matthew B
    10. Posted by Matthew B Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Let's face it: I'm not a fan of his overall game, but Ben Gordon is absolute dynamite off the bench as 6th Man. Now that they have Rose, he should be coming off the bench late 1st, early 2nd, and notching as many points as minutes he plays. Seems to me he's worth 8 million a year, considering some of the contracts being handed out. He's a streak shooter, yes, but when he gets on the court he ignites the offense. He'll make a team very happy, as long as he is a 6th man.
  11. R.T.
    11. Posted by R.T. Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Gordon issue is a tricky one. Leading Scorer, where can the Bulls find 20 points a game, or a legit 3-pt shooter, the prospect of Hughes getting those minutes, ALL of these are concerns.
    On the other side, 80 million for an under-sized, fairly one-dimensional shooting guard, who didn't start, and to those of you who actually saw Gordon play on a regular basis, the fact is that the guy simply cannot deal with being double-teamed, and while his turn-over and +/- are OK, he had a lot of late, critical t/overs late in games, caused by double-teams.
    At 25, will he really change and develop a defensive and/or a passing game? Questionable handle as well.
    Seems more like a role-player to me, something in the mold of former Piston, Vinnie "The Microwave" Johnson.
  12. RaymondStone.com
    12. Posted by RaymondStone.com Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:55 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Interesting 2007-08 Bulls +/- stat:
    These are the Bulls top lineups from 2007-08 based on how much they outscored their opponent throughout the season. Important note: the players are listed in order of how much they contributed to the positive +/- stat.
    Bulls Top 5-Player Combo:
    1. Ben Gordon
    2. Luol Deng
    3. Chris Duhon
    4. Andres Nocioni
    5. Joakim Noah
    Bulls Top 4-Player Combo:
    1. Ben Gordon
    2. Luol Deng
    3. Chris Duhon
    4. Tyrus Thomas
    Anyone notice a key player missing from this? To some, his first name is "Captain" lol.
  13. inanemusings
    13. Posted by inanemusings Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I love the houndstooth pattern in the background of that photo. Makes me dizzy though.
  14. the REAL Headless Chicken
    14. Posted by the REAL Headless Chicken Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Love that Steigegna reference. That's how you refer to champions...
  15. Dean H
    15. Posted by Dean H Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:14 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    As a Bulls fan who watched LOTS of games there is a different take to the Deng/Gordon scenario. 82 games list BG as a -4.3 net when he is on/off the floor, Hinrich a plus 0.3 and Deng a -1. That is how it seemed also. The main time when Gordon got going was against the second team and coming on in the 4th quarter for relief. BG should be traded also because he wants 12 million, the most on the team, not 8.
  16. xkal318
    16. Posted by xkal318 Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    overpaid
  17. Joe C
    17. Posted by Joe C Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You are wrong. Gordon is below average with respect to rebounds, steals, turnovers, blocked shots, and field goal percentage. He is not a good player.
  18. David D
    18. Posted by David D Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:38 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Here's hoping that Pax can swing another deal with N.Y. Sign and trade Gordon for multiple lottery picks.
    I also like the idea of getting Diaw from the Suns.
  19. Geo
    19. Posted by Geo Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:05 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The writer needs to do their homework. The Bulls are NOT over the salary cap and haven't paid a luxury tax since Jordan (not Gordon) was here. Ben Gordon is NOT their hardest working player. He's a 1-tool
    player. Not best at defense, rebounding, assists, scoring off the dribble, only best at shooting. If the premium for that one tool is enough to reward him with a contract equal to that of a good balanced player, then what gives? He should have taken the offer from last year.
  20. Sleock
    20. Posted by Sleock Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The Sixers did not "settle" for Elton Brand. you should stop writing, period!

Ball Don't Lie

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

J.E. Skeets

Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Featured NBA Video

Y! Sports Blogs

Ball Don't Lie Recent Readers