Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:58 am EDT
Did y'all hear there was a race at Talladega this weekend? Some greenhorn – Kelly Kapowski or something like that – won, and got-dayumn, it was insane.
As a race I won't soon forget, I'd even go so far as to call it legendary. I defend my characterization thusly: you know a race was crazy when it gets equal billing to a pandemic influenza outbreak. Improbably, the outcry over both happens to be safety, one justifiably, the other preposterously.
I'm not even remotely qualified to comment on science, plus I dig on swine (well, bacon), so I'm going to leave this solemn influenza topic alone. But I have to add my nickel to the 'Dega conversation. I feel obligated to defend it, particularly in the face of flippant commentary, crafted only to incite controversy.
Of particular note (and I hate to even point a finger in his direction and, in any infinitesimal manner, increase his market value) is Jay Marrioti's (another Jay!) drivel over at Fanhouse, which was equal parts traveling salesman and Hollywood-hypeman stereotype. Of course, he was not alone, as some of my favorite NASCAR journalists and voices joined in the chorus.
To sum up their collective point: Talladega will kill somebody someday and NASCAR is the devil reincarnate because of that.
Or paraphrased, NASCAR is wrong for something that hasn't happened.
Yes, it would be bad, very bad, if someone died at a NASCAR race. I understand this and empathize with the notion. Sadly, deaths have occurred at auto races and motor sport events to drivers, staff, crew and fans alike. There is precedent, and there was precedent before Carl played catch with the Talladega fence. Automobiles, in fact, are wildly deadly, the cause of some 50,000 deaths annually in the U.S. (placing it just behind seasonal influenza).
To sum up my point, and this should be rather obvious to anyone who has actually watched Talladega: Driving a 3,400 pound, 750 horsepower NASCAR stock car around a 2.66 mile tri-oval track at 197 mph without ever touching the brakes, inches from 42 other cars who happen to have no brake lights, turn signals, or patience, all with glory, fame, possibly a supermodel, and fortune on the line is deadly. It can kill you - you the driver, you the pit crew bloke chasing the tire into the infield and you the fan standing behind the wire catch fence (if the 23 beers you've consumed starting at 8:30 that day doesn't first).
Inherently, I know this. And I think most, if not all, NASCAR fans do, too. I do not delude myself. I do not think that such a thing is rational. I do not think that such a thing is safe. I have stood in the stands at Talladega, sweating buckets in that got-awful humidity, legally deaf and carbon monoxide buzzed, and there wasn't a single lap where I didn't question the lunacy of it all. These aren't radio flyers chasing gravity. They are combustion rockets, designed to laugh at the limits of physics. This is blatantly obvious to all of your senses when in attendance.
I damn near killed myself in high school racing a 1973 Volkswagen Thing to swim practice, and it can't sniff 60 downhill with a tailwind. Outcome: one front end and three moving violations, even though I was "stopped" at the time. Strap me into a CoT and I'm pretty sure I might just kill myself.
Partly, ah hell, mostly, this is my attraction to the sport. It's dangerous; I watch NASCAR because it isn't trading baskets, smacking ground-rule doubles or running out the clock, and I'm pretty sure that NASCAR knows this about me. (And this doesn't stop them from taking safety precautions with me in mind, such as those that actually saved lives on Sunday.) I like NASCAR because there is an inherent insanity and risk to it, even as a fan. Not to mention that it is cool as all hell.
Look, risk has a life-long love affair with reward, and that isn't NASCAR's doing. It's part of its allure. If you don't like it, you don't have to watch it, and better yet, don't comment on it.
From the Marbles is a NASCAR blog edited by Jay Busbee. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

NASCAR: 2009 Biggest Surprises and Disappointments
Posted Nov 23 2009
Posted Nov 23 2009
NASCAR: Perspective on Johnson's Titles
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
76 Comments
1 - 25 of 76
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Nascar isn't devil incarnate. What they've done in the past is not relevent. Frankly I don't care if the drivers were idiots to not recognize what full face helmets and HANS devices offered them. Served them right if they died- they made a choice, as you point out. Just as if you strap into a COT- go nuts buddy. I think you (intentionally) miss the point that drivers/pit crew unmistakingly have a different risk tollerance that the fans.
What is now relevent-- is that now that NASCAR realizes that they were a foot or two (or maybe a degree or two, or 100 pounds or so) away from either a) clearing the catch fence and killing 50+ people or b) punching completely through the catch fence (because of an increase angle of attack or weight of the car) and 'only' killing a handful of fans. There is no c). To not do something to protect the fans now that they have irrefutable evidence that a disaster is impending would be negligent. Criminally negligent if someone at the next Talladega race was to get killed by a flying car. They have to do something to make an honest attempt to lower the risk to those sitting in the lower grandstand. Additional reinforcement and a finer mesh to the catch fence may be all that's warranted. I don't know. But you're not thinking right if you say nothing needs to change.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
P.S. Markn..You are so right. 100,000 drunks leaving @ the same time!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'm not an engineer, but possibly making the car heavier (base weight) on the chassis and frame is the answer?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I, for one, would like to see an article about how the fence was designed/what impact it is meant to withhold. Maybe they do need to look at extending its height or strenght, but to paraphrase this article and a good article on NASCAR.COM (one of the few) the fence did its job.
I've never been to a NASCAR race, but I've been to hockey and baseball games, and I bet if you look at a NASCAR ticket you'll see, like at hockey and baseball games, warnings that the sport is dangerous and spectators could unpredictably be hurt.
I still bet more people required trips to the care center because of foolish behaviour in the infield than because of Carl's wreck.
Report Abuse
Carl's car was going back down when he got hit by Newman. The roof flaps worked.
He hit the fence really hard and it withstood the impact and put Carl's car back on the track with all four wheels on the ground. The catchfence worked.
Carl then got out of a car which was on fire, and jokingly ran across the start finish line. The rollcages, HANS device, seat belts, and firesuit worked.
The one problem is that debris did get into the stands and cause injuries, which I'm sure were not "minor" to the people that received them. But if that's the biggest issue here, than this makes NASCAR no more dangerous for the average fan than going to a baseball game, where hard hit foul balls go into the stands multiple times per game; forget about once every 22 years.
There were a number of empty seats at Talladega on Sunday, so maybe the "solution" - if one is needed - would be to remove some of the seating closest to the fence and let those people sit elsewhere. Talladega would make about the same amount of money selling tickets, they'd sell out more often, and fans would, at least in theory, be safer. Not to mention that those low seats in the tri-oval suck anyway.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How you'd be able to see through that, I dunno, but...
I watch racing for the racing, not the wrecks. That's just icing on the cake, but sometimes it's too sweet, if you catch my draft...
Report Abuse
Disclaimer: this was an attempt at humor. If you did not see the humor, the ignore above mentioned comment, and pull your panties out your hinney. If you got it, then alright then.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 76