Cagewriter - UFC

The UFC has finally arrived in the Pacific Northwest and it's bringing one of the most balanced pay-per-view cards in recent memory. The promotion stacked the televised portion with five tight fights and the odds reflect that with all of them featuring a favorite at minus-180 or less.

It starts at the top of the card with Randy Couture against Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira. Couture is 46 and Nogueira is 33 but both are fighting questions of age. Big Nog looked sluggish his last time out in a loss against Frank Mir while Couture is just old. It has to catch up with him at some point, doesn't it? There are some good fights at 205 and 185 pounds, all with a chance to catapult the winners closer to title contention. There's also pressure on a lot of fighters here. UFC has been cutting a lot of fighters recently. As many as 10 guys from this card could go if they lose.

Watch Cagewriter break down the top fights at UFC 102 with Dave Farra from RawVegas.tv

Sports betting on MMA is simple to understand. When you see a minus number that is the amount you need to bet to win $100. The favorite is always a minus number. So the bigger the minus number, the bigger favorite. Anything over -300 is a huge favorite. The plus number is what you get if you a bet a dog for $100.

UFC 102 Odds (Venetian Resort Hotel Casino)
Official plays in bold.

Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira (+130) v. Randy Couture (-160) - Heavyweight
This is a rough fight to read. Both fighters are coming off a loss but Big Nog (31-5-1, 2-1 UFC) looked worse in struggling on the feet against an average striker in Frank Mir. He was also sluggish in fights against Heath Herring and Tim Sylvia. The only worry here is how active Couture (16-9, 13-6 UFC) is when he's in Nogueira's guard. As long as he doesn't have a momentary slip and get caught in one of those classic Big Nog submissions, Couture should be able to grind out a decision.
PICK: COUTURE -160


Thiago Silva (+130) v. Keith Jardine (-160) - Light Heavyweight 
Silva really looked awful defensively against Lyoto Machida. Of course, lots of fighters have, but Silva was the first to really get smashed by "The Dragon." Tito Ortiz survived three rounds against Machida while Silva didn't even look competitive. Silva (13-1, 4-1 UFC) blamed the Machida loss on the way he cut the weight, but when you look at his ledger of UFC wins (James Irvin, Tomasz Drwal, Antonio Mendes, Houston Alexander) it's not all that impressive. Meanwhile Jardine (14-5-1, 6-4 UFC) has consistently fought top 10 light heavyweights including several ex-champs. Jardine will confuse Silva on the feet and be able to reach him whenever he wants. This could be a knockout or brutal beatdown.
PICK: JARDINE -160

Jake Rosholt (+150) v. Chris Leben (-180) - Middleweight
The UFC has done Rosholt (5-1, 0-1 UFC) few favors in lining him up against guys like Dan Miller and Chris Leben right out of the gates. He needs to wrestle to win this. Forget about trying to strike with Leben. Did he learn his lesson from the sloppy effort against Miller? Based on what happened to Miller against Chael Sonnen, where he was thrown around like a rag doll by the wrestler, Rosholt should've smashed him. He didn't. I fear he tries to show how well-rounded he is, again here at UFC 102. Unless you're a top of the food chain striker, you shouldn't stand for very long with Leben (18-6, 8-4 UFC).
PICK: LEBEN -180

Demian Maia (+145) v. Nate Marquardt (-175) - Middleweight 
Maia can strike fear in anyone if he can get the fight to the ground. His submissions are dynamite and he doesn't have to score his takedowns in traditional fashion. I loved Marquardt (28-8-2, 7-2 UFC) at the start of the week but some of his talk about taking the fight anywhere scares me. He should be able to easily outclass Maia (10-0, 5-0 UFC) on the feet, but if he gets sloppy and even worse, willingly goes to the mat with Maia, he could get upset. That said, "The Great" still has more ways to win the fight.
PICK: MARQUARDT -175

Krzysztof Soszynski (+140) v. Brandon Vera (-170) - Light Heavyweight 
Soszynski is a good journeyman fighter with excellent power. He's a heavyweight in a light heavy's body, but he also possesses the speed of a heavyweight. This is a perfect fight for Vera (10-3, 6-3 UFC), someone who will stand and bang on the feet. Vera's Muay Thai should allow him to be more dangerous on the feet and catch Soszynski (18-8-1, 3-0 UFC) more often than he's caught. Don't be fooled fooled by Soszynski's 3-0 mark in the UFC. Brian Stann isn't a UFC-level fighter and neither is Shane Primm. His other win came against Andre Gusmao, who was silly in trying to bang it out with the Canadian.
PICK: VERA -170

Aaron Simpson (+135) v. Ed Herman (-165) - Middleweight 
Simpson, 35, is a dynamite wrestler, but is he that much better than Herman? Herman (15-7, 4-4 UFC). is a pretty seasoned guy. I don't see him being unable to get off the mat against a ground and pounder like Simpson (5-0, 1-0 UFC) for very long. Herman should be able to find an opening to score a submission. If not, he may be headed for the ex-UFC fighter list.
PICK: HERMAN -165

Chris Tuchscherer (+280) v. Gabriel Gonzaga (-360) - Heavyweight 
Tuchscherer (17-1, 0-0 UFC) comes in with a good reputation after serving as a trainer partner of UFC heavyweight champion Brock Lesnar. His style should give Gonzaga some trouble as long as he doesn't try to slug it out with the Brazilian. Gonzaga has appeared to break mentally in some of his UFC losses. He smashed Shane Carwin to start their fight but when Carwin survived a broken nose, Gonzaga (10-4, 6-3 UFC) got sloppy. Gonzaga clearly broke when he got bullied by Couture and Fabricio Werdum. Tuchscherer is a former Division II All-American wrestler and has the bulk to pushed around Gonzaga. Gonzaga should win but I'm not laying this kind of price on a guy who's so unpredictable.
PICK: TUCHSCHERER +280 

Justin McCully (+180) v. Mike Russow (-220) - Heavyweight 
McCully (9-4-2, 2-1 UFC) has been sidelined an awful lot because of injuries, so it's hard to get a read on how good he is or how dedicated he is to the fight game. His two UFC wins, over Eddie Sanchez and Antoni Hardonk, aren't bad. Russow (11-1, 0-0 UFC) comes in with a good reputation as a great wrestler and submission fighter. That appears to be McCully's weakness. Plus there may be a strength difference with Russow holding a 22-pound weight advantage.
PICK: RUSSOW -220

Tim Hague (Even) v. Todd Duffee (-130) - Heavyweight 
Hague (10-1, 1-0 UFC) won his debut but was looking awful before Pat Barry lost his mind and got incredibly sloppy. Hague's defense standing was brutal. Hague is huge but so is Duffee, so there won't be a size disparity. Duffee (5-0) has been screwed out of several UFC fights, so he'll be ready to go in this one. He's coming off a nice TKO win over UFC-veteran Assuerio Silva, the same guy who went the distance with Tim Sylvia and Cheick Kongo.
PICK: DUFFEE -130

Nick Catone (+150) v. Mark Munoz (-180) - Middleweight
It's make or break time for both of these fighters. Catone has been a solid guy in the UFC but he's coming off a loss to Tim Credeur. Munoz made the wise move to bolt from the light heavyweight division where he was blasted out via head kick by Matt Hamill at UFC 96. He looked dynamite at the weigh-ins at middleweight. We'll see if his first time cutting down to 185 saps his stamina. Both guys have a decorated collegiate wrestling backgrounds but Munoz is on a different level. The story here is the same as it is for most NCAA champion wrestlers in MMA, play to your strength! Munoz shouldn't be testing out his striking. If he screws around too much, Catone is a solid submission fighter.
PICK: MUNOZ -180

Evan Dunham (+180) v. Marcus Aurelio (-220) - Lightweight
Dunham looked dynamite is his UFC debut against Per Eklund. The kid is a powerful striker with a frenetic pace. This is a big step up against a world class jiu-jitsu fighter in Marcus Aurelio, the BJJ coach at American Top Team in South Florida. Unfortunately Aurelio has shown himself to be a one trick pony. He doesn't operate well from his back and his striking has been weak in UFC losses to Clay Guida, Tyson Griffin and Hermes Franca. We'll roll the dice on the upset. As long as Dunham doesn't get caught in a silly position, he's got a shot to help us cash a dog ticket.
PICK: DUNHAM +180  

Join Cagewriter Sunday morning for the only UFC 102 postfight show from The Rose Garden starting at 1:30 a.m. ET. Listen here.

digg delicious
more

62 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. JJ
    1. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:44 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cofield...you are legitimately an idiot in my mind now. You are such a UFC lackey, it's terrible. ..."one of the most balanced pay-per-view cards in recent memory". You think 102 is one of the most balanced ppvs in recent memory. Seriously Cofield, why don't you go and post on the UFC website. Do you dry hump a real-life Dana White doll at night? Can you grow up and be a man and write these articles for true MMA fans instead of those that are still riding on the UFC bandwagon?? You know some of us would like to see a writer get some balls and be honest about things such as this particular ppv card and some of the others that the UFC has sold to us. How can anybody in their right mind say such a thing unless his name is Timothy V? Cofield sucks.
  2. JJ
    2. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:47 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cofield....there are 11 fights on this card. So if up to 10 fighters get cut, which one of the losers is likely to not get cut. Can you explain that a little more for me Steve?
  3. Brandon T
    3. Posted by Brandon T Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    doesn't "Real-Life" and "Doll" kind of contradict each other?
  4. smoovevibe
    4. Posted by smoovevibe Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    To me the story is Jardine being favored over Silva?... what do you guys think about that one? It's hard for me to like Jardine... like I've said on other threads I think this is one of those TUF over sells a guy who's real claim to fame is out pointing Chuck Liddell and stopping Forrest (but again I think Forrest is an overachiever). Besides that he doesn't have any wins against quality opponents does he? I'm seriously asking here... I mean the fight that was supposed to be his break out, make a case for a title shot fight was against Houston Alexander and we all know how that went... Wandy laid him out... I can't think of any quality wins besides the two I've named and again those are still marginal at best.
  5. Carpe
    5. Posted by Carpe Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    When is Machito going to fight again? He's undefeated currently but has literally disappeared since his last fight with the Sugarman.
  6. Rob R
    6. Posted by Rob R Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Smoove...I consider his split decision over Vera - despite how much people dislike Vera - a quality win.
    JJ...I think by "balanced" he means there aren't a whole lot of blowouts on the card. It has parity. Nobody on the televised card is better than a -180 favorite. The biggest favorite on the card is Gonzaga, and I think he might even be a little overpriced. Basically, check your unmitigated disdain for Cofield at the door and accept that the statement is objectively (based on the Vegas odds) pretty close to accurate.
  7. The Pens R mighty'r
    7. Posted by The Pens R mighty'r Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    UFC for the most part has lost its luster, I'll watch the replays of whats worth being seen on spike. TUF is still awesome and will probably always be worth following.
  8. JJ
    8. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't think Jardine should be favored. He fought Rampage pretty tough but looked bad in his losses to Wandy and Houston. I wouldn't consider his win against Forrest a quality win and the win against Chuck would have been a quality win 2-3 years ago. He's not a terrible fighter but definitely not a co-main event fighter. Both headline fights feature four fighters that lost their last fight. Not such a quality card if you ask me. When was the last time that a ppv had a main event between two fighters that lost their last fight? It's the names that make it a main event. Had this fight card put a championship fight on it, it may be considered ppv worthy but not with the card they have now. But I guess since Cofield is the man with all the answers and if he says it's one of the most balanced pay-per-view cards in recent memory, I guess we all have to believe that it is, don't we?
  9. Rob R
    9. Posted by Rob R Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Carpe: UFC 104 in October against Shogun Rua.
    JJ...as far as the "10 guys might get cut if they lose," he's not saying 10 guys might get cut after UFC 102...he's saying 10 guys might have their UFC run at stake. I'd say everybody in the bottom 4 fights on the card are at risk except maybe Hague. Herman and Simpson are probably at risk, and so is Tuchscherer, obviously.
  10. JJ
    10. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Aren't most of the cards supposed to have parity and don't most of them have a lot of parity? I don't know how anyone can accept any statements from Cofield unless they're statements from someone else. I mean, com'on. Does anybody really believe that the UFC would cut up to 10 fighters if they lose? And another question...if it's true that up to 10 fighters could be cut if they lose, why are they fighting on a ppv card? Some things just don't make sense....
  11. JJ
    11. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:03 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Rob...are you defending Cofield??
  12. Diego G
    12. Posted by Diego G Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:06 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow almost all of my bets are + (Maia,Rosholt,Silva,Catone) , add this to the Kerr pity bet and I think Ill have a nice weekend.
    Carpe Machida will fight Marco Rua on UFC 104,which also feature more action than this card if you want to save some bucks
  13. Diego G
    13. Posted by Diego G Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:12 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Also before Rob,and Timothy V start defnding the UFC, Nog and Couture is a fight to watch,we are talking the #3 and 2 HW of all time,this is intead a fight 3 maybe 4 years too late but still a good fight
  14. Rob R
    14. Posted by Rob R Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:23 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    JJ...Many cards have some degree of parity, but they also have that showcase kind of fight where you get to see somebody blow somebody else out. Go back through Cagewriter to past events, and you're sure to find at least one, if not two, fights on each televised card where the favorite is at least minus-250.
    I think there are 10 fighters on this card who could be cut if they don't look good on this card. Your question of why they're on a ppv card is irrelevant...neither I nor Cofield have stated that this is a particularly impressive fight card.
    So as far as this article goes?...Yes, I'm defending Cofield. You accuse Cofield of undue bias when, in fact, your derogatory posts are in and of themselves driven out of bias against Cofield. The card has a high degree of parity, and a lot of the guys on the card (especially considering UFC's recent trend of cutting people) could be in their last UFC fight tomorrow. Both those statements are true.
  15. JJ
    15. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:24 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The four headliners all lost their last fight. It should be free, I agree. I'm ready for 104.
  16. Rob R
    16. Posted by Rob R Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:27 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I'm no UFC shill, Diego. I think Strikeforce runs a solid promotion, and I'm becoming quite impressed by the 185 division they're building.
    I just think that people get too worked up over how they think this website is nothing but UFC propaganda. That shows when they say this article smacks of bias when it's - objectively - pretty much correct.
  17. PaddyRite
    17. Posted by PaddyRite Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Allot of money to be made at the betting window for sure!
  18. Diego G
    18. Posted by Diego G Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Didnt mean to offend you Rob
  19. Rob R
    19. Posted by Rob R Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:37 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    No problem.
    And actually, I do end up defending UFC a lot on here against people who think it's just a big hype machine. If you don't recognize that UFC has most of the best talent at every division except maybe lightweight, you're blind.
  20. JJ
    20. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Correction Rob...I've not taken the time in the past to blast Cofield for his articles. Honestly, I've not said anything negative prior to the most recent Strike Force card. I would read (and laugh out loud) at some of the posts that people took the time to put on here (the ones that blasted Cofield) but I never felt compelled to trash Cofield. But ANYBODY should be able to see how partial he is to the UFC. I blasted him on this one and another one that he did earlier this week when he said Gina Carano got a taste of her own medicine and again brought up her not sticking around for the post-fight news conference. He's mad cuz she didn't do a press conference and I believe he put personal feelings into that. He's a reporter and was mad cuz she didn't interview. I am definitely not biased against Cofield. I only trash him when I see something stupid that he writes. I know Cofield said "could" but in reality, the UFC is not going to cut up to 10 fighters if they lose this weekend. This is probably something Cofield got from Dana in his speech to the fighters when they arrived in Portland. Dana may have said this to get the fighters to put on a good show but he's not going to cut 10. I would venture to guess that he won't cut more than 5. That's a little more realistic than saying he could cut up to 10 fighters.
  21. Sandman
    21. Posted by Sandman Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Are you guys going to pay for this card???? That is utter silliness. The last WEC card was 10X more interesting. White needs to learn that mediocre cards, like this one, should be FREE on Spike. No way is this card worth PPV pricing.
  22. Sandman
    22. Posted by Sandman Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Nogueira (Old guy has not been interesting since Pride)
    Couture (Old guy, overrated, out of his prime, boring to watch)
    Thiago Silva (not even a gatekeeper)
    Keith Jardine (gatekeeper, mediocre at best)
    Jake Rosholt (nobody, mediocre)
    Chris Leben (gatekeeper, mediocre at best)
    Demian Maia (Totally one-dimensional, overrated, not even a gatekeeper, not even mediocre)
    Nate Marquardt (Sold gatekeeper)
    Krzysztof Soszynski (TUF Chump, mediocre)
    Brandon Vera (WAY OVER RATED!!!!! MEDIOCRE!!!!!!!)
    Aaron Simpson (Nobody)
    Ed Herman (Sucks)
    Chris Tuchscherer
    Gabriel Gonzaga (gatekeeper, mediocre at best)
    Justin Mcully (Nobody)
    Mike Russow (Nobody)
    Tim Hague (Nobody)
    Todd Duffee (Nobody)
    Nick Catone (Nobody)
    Mark Munoz (Totally overrated hack who almost died in his last fight)
    Evan Dunham (Nobody)
    This is the card you want to buy??? You guys are nuts!
  23. Sandman
    23. Posted by Sandman Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:00 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sorry, forgot one hack
    Chris Tuchscherer (not worth mentioning)
  24. JJ
    24. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:11 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sosynski didn't evenn win TUF
  25. JJ
    25. Posted by JJ Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:13 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Sandman..definitely not buying this card. Would like to watch a few of the fights out of curiousity but not paying money to watch it.

Cagewriter

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Steve Cofield

Cagewriter is an MMA blog edited by Steve Cofield. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Contributors:
Maggie Hendricks, Zak Jensen,

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Cagewriter Recent Readers