Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:52 am EDT
Dodgers owners Frank and Jamie McCourt have very publicly separated and now they are taking each other to court. Each filed suit against the other yesterday. Frank claims he's the majority owner of the team and former CEO Jamie says she shared ownership with him 50-50, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Jamie apparently made $2 million a year from the Dodgers while she says Frank was making between $5 million and $6 million. Their players must pity such poor folks.
Jamie is now asking for her job back along with monthly spousal support of $320,967. Or, if she doesn't get her job back with the team, only $487,634. That's a drop in the bucket for a couple supposedly worth $1.2 billion, according to Jamie's numbers.
She's saying that Frank has been trying to kick her out of team management since July 2008 when he apparently tried to move her office out of Dodgers Stadium. Then he apparently had her name removed from a wide variety of Dodgers printed materials.
Court papers also showed that before McCourts took over the team in 2004 after purchasing it for $431 million, it had lost a boatload of cash in the preceding years: $57 million in 2000, $85 million in 2001, $83 million in 2002, and $78 million in 2003,
Source: Los Angeles Times
Posted Nov 18 2009
Scioscia gets top manager honors
Posted Nov 18 2009
Rockies skipper is NL manager of the year
Posted Nov 18 2009
124 Comments
1 - 25 of 124
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Seriously though for a moment... Certainly if they didn't before now, the Dodgers must realize that they need to sign a front-of-the-rotation starting pitcher this off-season. The best guy out in FA, right down the freeway, is John Lackey. It's a perfect fit, because the Dodgers have the players to be right back up at the top of the NL next year, so Lackey would move from one contender to another; the Dodgers are dropping a lot of salary from the books this off-season and can afford him; Lackey doesn't have to even relocate, and moving to the NL should help his statistics. So, here's the question -- who does Ned Colletti go to in order to get approval to spend the money? A Lackey deal would probably be in the $75 million range. The way the McCourts are fighting over everything, it's doubtful that if one endorses the move, the other one will too. And Colletti doesn't want to risk his job siding with one while waiting to find out which one will ultimately be his boss.
Report Abuse
It would be nice if they could settle peacefully out of court. If they can't do that, they shouldn't be running a baseball team.
Report Abuse
Artist, Everything that goes wrong in baseball & the world is the fault of the 40 time AL Champion, 26 time (soon 27) World Champion Yankees. I feel that all things are in proper order in the AL now & will soon be in baseball.
Jacks,
How about that wager?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
But great news for Giants' fans. And Phillie fans to a lesser degree.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
How about if the Yankees win you have to use a Yankee emblem until spring training. If the Phillies win I'll use a Dodgers.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You forgot the start of WWI by assassinating Arch-Duke Ferdinand, the reason there is the HIV virus, monsoons, tsunamis, tornadoes, gridlock around L.A. and last but not least, the Washington Senators going under. Twice.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 124