Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:10 am EST
The New York Mets are apparently telling reliever J.J. Putz(notes) to take a hike this off-season.
The New York Post is reporting that the team won't be picking up his $9.1 million option for next season. Why should it after he pitched only 29 1/3 innings and gave up 18 runs in the process. Not exactly what you want from a reliever, particularly one who was the centerpiece to a three-team deal that involved the Seattle Mariners and Cleveland Indians. We went through all that trouble for this?
Putz has a $1 million buyout clause. Mets GM Omar Minaya is sure to take it. And watch Putz take some kind of incentive-laden deal somewhere else.
Source: New York Post
Posted Nov 24 2009
Marlins Donate Turkeys In Little Havana
Posted Nov 24 2009
Posted Nov 23 2009
70 Comments
1 - 25 of 70
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
he thrives in that role.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Did a guy named Putz really have a shot in NYC?
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
When you write Carlos Delgado's last name as Del Gado, you can figure that out.
Beltran and Jose Reyes NEVER go on the DL. This is the first time they've been on the DL for an extended period of time with the Mets. You might be frustrated because of the injuries and I can understand that, but you can't blame them if they've been playing every single game for the past 3 years. As far as Delgado goes, I think he still has a little left in the tank. If I could keep him on the cheap, I would. He was doing really well before he went down with the injury. You don't ship away your entire core because they were injured for a season. That makes no sense. Also, before the injuries, Omar looked like he assembled a pretty darn good team. If they had stayed healthy, they probably would have done enough to make the playoffs, in my opinion. So you can't blame him either. This was a fluke year, I say keep just about everybody (including putz) and try again next year, hoping everyone's healthy.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You have to stop copying & pasting your notes...they are getting really boring.
On a more positive note...2 guys who's opinions I really respect, Al Leiter & Barry Larkin were pretty positive last night in terms of the Mets. Leiter said last night on the MLB Channel that he thought David Wright was the player to watch in 2010. After getting that first year in CitiField under his belt and being surrounded by healthy and better players this year, his stats should get back to where they normally are.
Larkin said that, especially now that the Yankees were champions, he see's the Mets doing whatever needs to be done to put a winner on the field, so he chose the Mets as the team to watch in 2010.
The NY Post reported today that the Yankees were not going after any high priced free agents, so that's good for the Mets also.
Report Abuse
Ron B is probably more like an 86 Mets fan who's stuck in a time warp wondering why the Mets can't be champs again like 1n 1986 with only one quiet little Latino on the team like Raffy Santana.
I don't care when people say they should trade Reyes or Beltran, but I hate when they invent the numbers to justify it!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
That aside; both Beltran and Reyes when healthy and in the line-up make the Mets a better team. I don't think people realize just how serious Beltran's injury was. As for Reyes; I think the medical staff just screwed the pooch on that from the beginning. And one more thing on Reyes. With some maturity, I think he can still get better. Personally, I don't think he's reached his full potential yet.
As for Beltran; If he's healthy, he's one of the best all-around CFers in the game (forgetting about what he's paid). And if you don't believe me; ask ANYONE in baseball.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 70