Selig: Some clubs lost money
CHICAGO (AP)—Some teams lost money in 2009, baseball commissioner Bud Selig said Thursday after the final owners meeting of the year.
“There was no question about that,” Selig said. “I don’t think the concerns have been ameliorated at all. I think the concerns are still there because all these people have their own economists.”
Selig said final figures for this year are still being calculated and everyone is living in the most difficult economic times since the Great Depression. He declined to identify the teams.
“I think of all the heartache that’s in the world,” Selig said. “We live in this environment. We don’t live in a bubble. And so, I think the clubs in some areas have been hit a lot harder than others.”
Major League Baseball’s average attendance dropped 6.7 percent last season from an average of 32,528 in 2008 to an average of 30,350. Total attendance of 73.4 million was baseball’s fifth-highest.
“Given the economy, the fact that we drew 73.5 million people is a testament to this sport’s popularity and everything that has been done is remarkable,” Selig said.
With the free-agent market set to open Friday, teams and agents are uncertain whether the economy will impact salaries.
“Revenues as a whole were flat at best and I think there’s still a lot of people, and obviously we’re still focused on our fans, that are still struggling,” Angels owner Arturo Moreno said.
Moreno has two players who became free agents after helping the Angels win the AL West: right-hander John Lackey(notes) and third baseman Chone Figgins(notes). The Angels have already kept Bobby Abreu(notes), agreeing to a $19 million, two-year contract.
Re-signing both Lackey and Figgins could be difficult.
“I think there’s going to be X amount of players that are going to probably get great contracts and I think there’s a lot of players that I think it’s going to happen like last year, where there are going to be good players available towards the end,” Moreno said.
Selig said there was no discussion at the meeting of increasing the use of video review by umpires, a subject that has been debated following several missed calls during the postseason.
Owners also heard reports and welcomed new Chicago Cubs owner Tom Ricketts.
“It was very interesting. Once again, just learning,” Ricketts said after emerging from the meeting.
The Cubs, who drew over 3 million fans again last season, had the third-highest payroll at the beginning of last season behind the New York Yankees and Mets.
“I’m not going to make any predictions on the economy. I think we did OK as a team,” Ricketts said.
Texas Rangers owner Tom Hicks is putting together a group of local investors, including Hall of Fame quarterback Roger Staubach, for a bid that would enable him to keep majority ownership of the team.
Several other groups have been identified as potential bidders.
“I don’t know what’s going on,” Selig said. “The bids are due tomorrow and I’ll be anxious then to see them.”
Selig didn’t say much about the St. Louis Cardinals’ decision to hire Mark McGwire as their hitting coach.
“Let’s see how it all plays out. I’ve talk to Tony La Russa a lot about it and I’ve talked to Bill DeWitt about it,” he said, referring to the Cardinals manager and owner.
McGwire, who hit 70 homers in 1998 and retired in 2001 with 583 for his career, became notorious when he refused to discuss the past when testifying at a 2005 congressional hearing about steroids.
Owners also heard reports on the annual civil rights game, the World Cup, legislative affairs, baseball’s Internet division, the first-year MLB Network and the amateur draft.


Bleed Cubbie Blue
Pinstripe Alley
Viva El Birdos
234 Comments
1 - 25 of 234
Report Abuse
Let Selig NAME the teams, and let's see WHY said teams are losing money.
Until then, it's all disingenuous bull juice.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Really?
Report Abuse
They aren't going to lower prices just to do it, they'll only do that when they have to. I mean honestly, GM and Ford lost money in 2007, did their cars get cheaper in 2008? No.
Most companies are cutting wages and salaries, are prices going down for new goods? No.
They'll exact what they can get.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Championship? All of their articles read, what a great season our team had. THEY LOST. After the 1st 6 weeks of the season, when the Dodgers got the jump on the Western Division of the National League, playing the West 28 of the 1st 35 games, and teams like San Francisco, and Colorado, were no where what they looked like at the end of the season. THEY LOST. Colorado, although losing 14 of 19 games to the Dodgers last season, still had a better Won & Lost Record than the Dodgers did after June 1st.. THEY LOST. Oh what a great season, Kemp & Eithier had. THEY LOST.
I am sick & tired of the hype, the Dodgers put out, especially in the Radio Announcer's booth, with
Rick Monday & Charlie Steiner. NO MATTER WHAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN, about a team they would like to see come back without any changes, THEY STILL LOST. They blamed the split-up of the
McCourts, as a distraction, and as usual other poor excuses for losing. FACE THE FACTS DODGERS, YOU STILL LOST.
Report Abuse
I found it interesting how Selig never, to my knowledge, named the franchises that are "losing" money.
Great post, and very informative.
Amazingly, it DIDN'T contain any "idiots" "morons" "losers" "jerks" "pinheads", and unbelievably "intelligent" misspellings of profanity to "sneak" them by the program.
An intelligent post---I may need to lay down
Report Abuse
But that's not the case.
Stop being sour grapes, haters. It's pathetic how you guys try to rationalize a loss.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
and the Roid sux and Cubs would've been competitive.
Haters, your math is bad and you should feel bad.
Report Abuse
$.4B for a combined 0.508 winning percentage.
0-3 in the playoffs (Red Sox thoroughly pwned by a team with a lower payroll)
Sometimes, money can't buy squat.
Report Abuse
Oops, you're right... almost. Wikipedia has Santa Clara County as #10 wealthiest nationally, population over 250K. San Francisco is... not listed.
In California, Santa Clara County ranks second (Median Household Income), San Francisco only tenth. Refer to Wikipedia, California locations by per capita income, then press the "Median Household income" title to order the counties by that value.
About the cities, sorry, you're not right. As of the 2006 (from memory), San Jose had the highest median household income among cities over 250K, the same survey placed San Francisco as only #6. I tried to check that with Wikipedia, but they only have per capita numbers for cities (but median household numbers for the counties, which is strange). You can look for the reference in the San Jose Wikipedia entry under Demographics, which they list as of 2007.
Keep in mind that San Francisco has only about 800K people, vs 1 million+ (as of August 2009) in San Jose and 1.8 million in Santa Clara County. Even if median incomes were the same (which they aren't), that's still MORE THAN TWICE the purchasing power.
If you check the projected growth numbers of San Jose and San Francisco made by the state Franchise Tax Board, they will show relatively high growth in both San Jose, and Santa Clara County, whereas San Francisco is essentially no growth. It is a demographic certainty that San Jose alone will be more than twice as large as San Francisco, with Santa Clara County more than 3x. I believe that projection was within the next 20 years, but obviously, the time frame will vary.
The point was, and remains, the Giants made a tremendous business mistake in choosing the smaller, poorer city in the smaller, poorer county with the smaller slower growth rate when they chose to stay in San Francisco. And they are losing money because of it. And they keep losing money because of it.
San Francisco was a great city... in 1950.
In Northern California, San Jose is the city, and Santa Clara the county, of the future.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If payroll = World Series the Yankees would have 40. It takes a little magic. Team chemistry. When a team has it they are very tough to beat. They like Swisher around. Sometimes that is all it takes is one guy. The Dodgers Traded La Duca thinking late in the season this disruptive factor would ruin their team, I don't know about that but they the team took a nosedive it took three seasons to overcome. La Duca is roudy, but I remember those great Oakland teams with Catfish Hunter. Man those guys had fist fights in the dugout, often! That was their chemistry and man did they win.
May the blue bird of happiness crap on someone else
1 - 25 of 234