Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:20 pm EDT

If the definition of good art is something that makes you think, debate and just a wee bit uncomfortable, all at the same time, I'd say Washington did a great job with the three new statues they unveiled at Nationals Park earlier this week.
No, the figures of Washington baseball legends Walter Johnson (above), Josh Gibson (right) and Frank Howard don't look like prototypical sports statues you normally see, but I think that's the point. The statues were ordered by the D.C. Commission on the Arts and Humanities and it's obvious that sculptor Omri Amrany wanted to put a new spin on the usual tributes located outside stadiums everywhere.
Thus, powerful Walter Johnson is featured with three right arms, Josh Gibson's sweet swing is highlighted with multiple bats frozen at different spots and Frank Howard's strength is portrayed with five massive and outstretched arms. While I still can't decide if these statues will hold up over seasons and seasons of visitors, they're awfully cool to look at and think about. It's an unconventional approach and I applaud it.
Of course, not everyone is a fan and Washington Post art critic Blake Gopnik blasted the risk-taking venture like David Wright on a Scott Olsen, uh, "fastball":
"At the unveiling, Amrany said his goal was to use bronze to go beyond the physical so as to capture speed and time, 'the fourth dimension.' Rather than zooming, however, his bronze appears to glop. It has the unfortunate effect of making his players seem covered in tumorous growths. They also get multiple arms. The creature designers from 'Star Trek' have rarely played this fast and loose with bodies ....
"As for the grace and power we expect from significant art, forget about finding it in any of these works. Translated into baseball terms, a team would have to place dead last in the major leagues to rank as low as this work does as art. Come to think of it, these four pieces may count as the ... Nationals of art."
Yeouch. Guess that's the equivalent of a beanball in the art world. Tough crowd.
One critic has a solid point, though. The Lerner family, owner of the Nats, is very into art and is worth over $3 billion. The Lerners will no doubt appreciate this, yet the $700,000 cost of this project was handled by D.C. taxpayers on top of the $611 million they already coughed up for the new ballpark. So, yeah, maybe they could have contributed some cash.
Viewed in a vacuum, though, I still enjoy these statues. Sue me, Mr. Gopnik.
Nats 320 has a lot of great photos of the statues here and here.
Big League Stew is an MLB blog edited by Kevin Kaduk. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Feb 7 2010
Fantasy Baseball: First Round Firepower
Posted Feb 8 2010
Fantasy Baseball: Players On The Rise
Posted Feb 8 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
21 Comments
1 - 21 of 21
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
They may not stand the test of time as Americans' attention spans dwindle, but if you stare at the statues for a little while, especially the Frank Howard one, these statues are a great idea. Hopefully no one copies them (unless the Comerica thing is true...)
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Kind of cool, but the artist probably was the kid in little league who ran to first with the bat!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'll bet these frighten small children. I'm an adult and I can't bear to look at them.
Report Abuse
1 - 21 of 21