Big League Stew - MLB

Minor spoiler alert: If you haven't watched last night's LOST yet, don't watch this spiffy new RedLasso clip. Don't follow the jump, either, to read about the possible significance of yet another Red Sox reference on the show. 

In the clip above, Jack picks up a newspaper that contains the headline: "Yankees bludgeon Red Sox in series sweep." Jack then scoffs and mutters, "A-Rod," before placing the paper back down and heading on with his day. 

Since it was packaged with other mundane tasks like picking up stray toys and making the morning coffee, it would seem like the look was just a throwaway reference. But considering that the essence of LOST is in the details, we have to assume it's not.

Actually, it could have provided a decent time marker for when last night's "flash-forward" took place. Since the survivors crashed on the island during the 2004 World Series (as we've learned from past Red Sox references), this latest episode had to take place at least starting in 2005.

However, the Yankees did not sweep the Red Sox a single time in '05. For the first clean rout of the Red Sox, you have to jump to 2006, which, of course, was the year the Yankees famously won five straight games in Fenway from Aug. 18-21 to more or less end the Red Sox' hopes of winning the AL East.  A-Rod didn't do much in the finale of the series — he went 1-for-4 in a 2-1 New York win pitched by Cory Lidle — but was 7-for-21 over the five games, including three doubles, five runs and five RBI.

The Yankees have swept the Red Sox only one other time since then — Aug. 28-30, 2007 in the Bronx — but Rodriguez didn't have the same kind of series and it doesn't have the same kind of significance of five games at Fenway. 

Assuming this wasn't just a small way of Damon Lindelof (a Yankees fan) getting back at fellow producer Carlton Cuse (a Red Sox fan), this would seem to mean that last night's episode took place in Aug. 2006.  And while I have no idea how that date fits together with anything just yet — you weren't expecting the secrets of LOST to be divulged in this blog post, were you? — it's probably worth jotting down in your episode notes.

For more LOST on the Stew, check out Dennis Velasco's player-character comparison post from Thursday in which he mocks Jack for never making a move on Kate. (How'd that one turn out?)

digg delicious
more

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Jay Busbee
    1. Posted by Jay Busbee Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:33 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hasn't it been established somewhere that Jack's a Red Sox fan? Here's what I thought at first--alternate universe where the Sox signed A-Rod, yet he punked out in the playoffs for a whole new team.
    August 2006 seems too soon, based on the age of the kid...seems he's at least three to four, which would put it in 2007 or--hey!--2008.
    Unless, of course, the island's time-warping properties threw everything off...I'll stop now.
    /Lost geekout
  2. Duk
    2. Posted by 'Duk Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jay, I considered the appearance of Aaron, but I think it's possible he could have been a two-year-old in that scene. Also, all the other Red Sox references have been to events that actually happened, so I'm not sure why they would change that now.
    Love the alternate reality theory, though.
  3. Andie
    3. Posted by Andie Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:01 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    There's a picture of the article here: http://images.lostpedia.com/images/3/32/Yankees_Red_Sox_article.jpg
    And somebody posted in the comments of a recap I read that Robinson Cano hit two home runs off Curt Schilling August 30th 2007 in the Yanks sweep of the Red Sox, which is what the article mentions in the top of the right-hand column.
    Just putting in my two cents.
  4. Duk
    4. Posted by 'Duk Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:07 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Behold, the powers of hi-def! Leave it to the Lost producers to be intentionally misleading once again. A-Rod was just 1-for-3 in that game. Guess having Jack mutter "Oh, Robbie Cano" wouldn't have had the same power.
  5. Ron M
    5. Posted by Ron M Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:43 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hi Redsox fans, just a little news I picked up while I was in New York last week. I was in a bar and over heard two guys talking about the jersey that was buried and one of them said that it had worked just like they thought it would and NY would never find the other stuff that was buried. One of them said something about a Yaz bat and a autographed Ted Williams ball. When they saw me looking at them they both quite talking and left in a hurry. Sure hope its true.
  6. danman8814
    6. Posted by danman8814 Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:35 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    You can actually read a lot of the article and it's clearly talking about August 30th, 2007, but for some reason there's a box score for the Angels and Astros under the article. If you look at it, you can see that the Astros had 4 runs and that the Angels either had 6 or 8. The Angels and Astros have played only one series since 2004, and on June 20th, 2007, the Angels won 8-4. (The Yanks and Red Sox didn't play that day but even if they did the article is unarguably talking about August 30th.)
    So it appears that this newspaper that Jack is holding never actually existed. Rather than simply bringing the actual newspaper onto the set, the makers of Lost have appeared to fabricate a fake paper containing that article.
    Why would they do that???

Big League Stew

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

'Duk

Big League Stew is an MLB blog edited by Kevin Kaduk. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Teams

Customize to follow news and rumors on your favorite teams. [ Sign in ]

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Big League Stew Recent Readers