Devil Ball Golf - Golf

Some good golf news out of Washington of late, as the U.S. House of Representatives voted 422 to 1 to award Arnold Palmer the Congressional Gold Medal. It's one of America's highest civilian honors, a recognition of Palmer's lifetime of --

... hey, hold on a second. The vote was 422 to 1? Who the heck would vote against Arnold Palmer receiving an award? Everybody loves Arnie! Everybody except terrorists, of course ...

The offending party actually turned out to be none other than erstwhile presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-Texas). But why wouldn't he vote for Palmer? Paul must hate golf, that's it. Or maybe he's always been a Nicklaus fan. Or maybe he's just an old curmudgeon. That's got to be it, right?

Opinions in Washington flutter like the cherry blossoms in the spring, completely devoid of any real attachment to facts or reality, and this could have easily been another case where Paul got hammered without ever getting a chance to explain himself. But Riverside Press-Enterprise reporter Ben Goad actually went out and figured out the real story. (Hat tip to Geoff Shackelford for the find.)

Seems that Paul votes against any and all Congressional Gold Medals, no matter who's up for the award. He voted against Rosa Parks, for heaven's sake. And he's actually got a reasonable explanation for doing so. According to his spokeswoman, Rachel Mills:

"It is certainly nothing personal against Mr. Palmer. In fact, Congressman Paul admires him greatly. Dr. Paul opposes using public monies for any and all of these gold medals given to private citizens, just on principle. Not to mention, it is unconstitutional to use taxpayer dollars in this way. He even suggested on the House Floor before he voted against Rosa Parks's medal that if it meant so much to the Members of Congress, why not fund the award out of their own pockets? He pulled $100 out of his own wallet, but had no other takers. At a time like this when all budgets are stretched so thin, it seems especially inappropriate to lavish gifts like this on private citizens, as much as he may admire the individual."

Wow. A congressman standing on principle like that, and not for some underhanded back-door political gain? That's actually fairly impressive -- and fairly depressing that the bar for congressional honesty is set so low that a simple "no" vote is an act of freakin' political courage.

But here's what he was voting against. The Congressional Gold Medal is one of the nation's highest honors, along with the Congressional Medal of Freedom. Originally intended for war heroes, it's been broadened to include a wide range of individuals who have performed a notable public service to the country. Recent recipients include Jackie Robinson, the Dalai Lama, Mother Teresa and Dr. Michael DeBakey, who perfected the heart transplant. You could quibble over whether a golfer deserves to be in such august company, but if Charles Schulz and Frank Sinatra could get it -- and they have -- then surely Arnie belongs as well.

So, bravo to both gentlemen -- Arnie for receiving the award, and Paul for not compromising his principles. Still, when Arnie is making his list of congressmen he'll be inviting to join him on the course, I've got a feeling we can go ahead and slot Rep. Paul at No. 423.

digg delicious
more

177 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. CrackerJack
    1. Posted by CrackerJack Fri May 15, 2009 9:30 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The average "Joe" who is swayed by the mainstream media could/can learn alot from Dr. Paul.
    ...both are true American Heroes who stand on principle, of which this country was founded. We need more Americans like them!!
  2. Timmy
    2. Posted by Timmy Fri May 15, 2009 9:42 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    With the budget stretched so thin, MAYBE Mr. Paul would like to work for NO Salary then. I'm sure "DR.Ron" can afford not to be paid.......Otherwise he's just being a silly hypocrite.
  3. chester copperpot
    3. Posted by chester copperpot Fri May 15, 2009 9:43 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    This country missed out by not giving RP a real chance in his presidential candidacy.
    His political views may not be perfect (although close), but his integrity is second to none.
  4. Wayne M
    4. Posted by Wayne M Fri May 15, 2009 9:43 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Just another political hack. How good can you be in your party when Limbaugh thinks you are a whack job?
  5. chester copperpot
    5. Posted by chester copperpot Fri May 15, 2009 9:47 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @TdnDenver: How is he being a hypocrite? I do not think that word means what you think it means.
    Judging by your moniker I think it's safe to say you're thinking with your bleeding heart and not your head.
  6. chester copperpot
    6. Posted by chester copperpot Fri May 15, 2009 9:51 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @Wayne: party lines are part of the problem. RP is designated a republican, but he's actually a Libertarian.
    Rush has to think he's a whack job because RP's social views are not in line with the conservative base.
    Far from a hack.
  7. GolferInKilt
    7. Posted by GolferInKilt Fri May 15, 2009 10:14 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    When the Dalai Lama heard that Ron Paul voted against him he said: "On his deathbed, Ron Paul will receive total consciousness." So, you know, he's got that working for him.
    Gunga galunga. Gunga gunga galunga.
  8. Lou.M.
    8. Posted by Lou.M. Fri May 15, 2009 10:15 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    When I first saw this I thought "oh no, not a Texas Republican (being one myself) and then I read the entire article and must say, I'm proud . of him. This is not to say I'm not for Arnie. I too, think they are both heroes
  9. Wayne M
    9. Posted by Wayne M Fri May 15, 2009 10:19 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    @chester copperpot, I respect what you have to say and I should probably choose a better term to express my opinion. In retrospect, I have more of a problem with his people/supporters than him personally. During the primaries, his people and Kucinich's (I do personally dislike him) people were the most hostile and unfriendly people. (of all the campaigns I ran across in my state) Almost being assaulted by supporters in both campaigns for saying I supported someone else. One of which was in my own front yard.
    Apologies for the kneejerk reaction, but I do disagree with the award for Arnie.
  10. Lou.M.
    10. Posted by Lou.M. Fri May 15, 2009 10:20 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jsay B. I think you picked a good topic. Golfers seem to love politics
  11. Lou.M.
    11. Posted by Lou.M. Fri May 15, 2009 10:26 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    ,Jay B. I think you picked a great topic, especially when golf is a little boring right now. Golfers seem to love politics.
  12. Wayne M
    12. Posted by Wayne M Fri May 15, 2009 10:32 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I don't know if it is we actually like it, Lou. Maybe more like we can't stay away from it. You know, moth to a flame type of thing.
  13. Chas db MacDuff
    13. Posted by Chas db MacDuff Fri May 15, 2009 10:56 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jay, this is the best bit of writing you've done since January. Thank you for clarity in the midst of tension.
  14. Lou.M.
    14. Posted by Lou.M. Fri May 15, 2009 11:02 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wayne M. I guess it's a good thing we do. Someone has to watch them. lol
  15. BertS
    15. Posted by BertS Fri May 15, 2009 12:16 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Q: "Who the heck would vote against Arnold Palmer receiving an award?"
    A: Maybe the family of Casey Martin, the guy who sued to ride in a cart on the PGA Tour. Chief among those opposed to the idea... you guessed it, Mr. Arnold Palmer. Whenever the show Arnie on TV, my wife still refers to him as 'that old douche who didn't want the handicapped guy to have a cart.'
  16. Kevin S
    16. Posted by Kevin S Fri May 15, 2009 12:31 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Well, since we're at it, lets do away with all public funding that celebrates an individual - starting with military medals. I mean, afterall, those guys over in Iraq are getting PAID for that work. Next - there's the Lincoln & Washington Monuments - with commodities prices these days, all that stone could fetch a pretty penny. I supposed Educational Grants & Scholarships fall under "celebrating an individual' - in either case 1 person is getting and award for a life-long achievement.
    If you don't get the sarcasm - you probably support Congressman Paul. The problem with Paul isn't that he stood for principles - its that his principles are wrong. 422 others also seem to think his principles are wrong.
  17. Lou.M.
    17. Posted by Lou.M. Fri May 15, 2009 12:44 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Kevin--his principles are to cut down on government spending. What are you, a democrat? I don't say I agree in regard to this issue, but I do get his idea.
  18. murfieslaw
    18. Posted by murfieslaw Fri May 15, 2009 1:17 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Slow news day.
  19. greensidejohnny
    19. Posted by greensidejohnny Fri May 15, 2009 1:39 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    And i vote against you being a talented writer !!!!!!
  20. John S
    20. Posted by John S Fri May 15, 2009 1:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Kevin S,
    There's a big difference between honoring a "private citizen" and a military soldier, so that comparison -- and most of the others -- falls flat. However, I agree that the granting of "Educational Grants & Scholarships" is similar to the award, and I'll bet that Rep. Paul is against them also (and I admire him for that).
  21. MattM
    21. Posted by MattM Fri May 15, 2009 1:50 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Kevin and TDN are both morons. His position is exactly right and in line with his political principles. He believes that tax dollars don't belong to the government but rather to the people that earned the money - american citizens. Not one politician spends or will ever spend a dime of the money like it's their own. I happen to agree.
  22. william
    22. Posted by william Fri May 15, 2009 1:52 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I feel Arnold Palmer should be elected Senator . He has been very goog for the cattle business and would have alot to offer the United States in Washington. He would have to drive his own car even if they provide one to use.
  23. peter
    23. Posted by peter Fri May 15, 2009 1:53 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I am impressed with Congreeman Paul's courage and integrity in sticking to his belief on Congress giving out medals to private citizens. However, considering the amount of money in Trillions government is borrowing/printing,
    it seems a bit out of proportion to penny pinch. By the way Mr.J.B. got it wrong about Arnie's list of golf invitation.
    Arnie we know and admire is not the type of person who would put Mr. Paul at the end, rather in the front...
  24. Douglas C
    24. Posted by Douglas C Fri May 15, 2009 1:59 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Cracker Jack, could you explain what you are trying to say? Your comment makes no sense at all. What can we learn from Dr. Paul? Who is Dr. Paul? What are you talking about? Do you know? Arnie has contributed so much to so many for so long, only one out of every four hundred plus would find him undeserving of the award.
  25. BigE
    25. Posted by BigE Fri May 15, 2009 2:22 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey TdnDenver, when was last time you had a job and didn't get paid? Not wanting to use tax payer money
    for a stupid award, how does that make him a hipocrite? Standing for your principles, wether you agree or not, is not hipocritical, thats what makes it a principal. Giving in because your worried about public pressure like most of the other congress members even though you don't agree, that makes you hipocritical. Learn what hipocritical means before you use it in sentence.

Devil Ball Golf

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Jay Busbee

Devil Ball is a golf blog edited by Jay Busbee. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Contributors:
Michael Arkush,

Related Photo Gallery

Featured Golf Video

Y! Sports Blogs

Devil Ball Golf Recent Readers