Fri May 15, 2009 9:09 am EDT
Some good golf news out of Washington of late, as the U.S. House of Representatives voted 422 to 1 to award Arnold Palmer the Congressional Gold Medal. It's one of America's highest civilian honors, a recognition of Palmer's lifetime of --
... hey, hold on a second. The vote was 422 to 1? Who the heck would vote against Arnold Palmer receiving an award? Everybody loves Arnie! Everybody except terrorists, of course ...
The offending party actually turned out to be none other than erstwhile presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-Texas). But why wouldn't he vote for Palmer? Paul must hate golf, that's it. Or maybe he's always been a Nicklaus fan. Or maybe he's just an old curmudgeon. That's got to be it, right?
Opinions in Washington flutter like the cherry blossoms in the spring, completely devoid of any real attachment to facts or reality, and this could have easily been another case where Paul got hammered without ever getting a chance to explain himself. But Riverside Press-Enterprise reporter Ben Goad actually went out and figured out the real story. (Hat tip to Geoff Shackelford for the find.)
Seems that Paul votes against any and all Congressional Gold Medals, no matter who's up for the award. He voted against Rosa Parks, for heaven's sake. And he's actually got a reasonable explanation for doing so. According to his spokeswoman, Rachel Mills:
"It is certainly nothing personal against Mr. Palmer. In fact, Congressman Paul admires him greatly. Dr. Paul opposes using public monies for any and all of these gold medals given to private citizens, just on principle. Not to mention, it is unconstitutional to use taxpayer dollars in this way. He even suggested on the House Floor before he voted against Rosa Parks's medal that if it meant so much to the Members of Congress, why not fund the award out of their own pockets? He pulled $100 out of his own wallet, but had no other takers. At a time like this when all budgets are stretched so thin, it seems especially inappropriate to lavish gifts like this on private citizens, as much as he may admire the individual."
Wow. A congressman standing on principle like that, and not for some underhanded back-door political gain? That's actually fairly impressive -- and fairly depressing that the bar for congressional honesty is set so low that a simple "no" vote is an act of freakin' political courage.
But here's what he was voting against. The Congressional Gold Medal is one of the nation's highest honors, along with the Congressional Medal of Freedom. Originally intended for war heroes, it's been broadened to include a wide range of individuals who have performed a notable public service to the country. Recent recipients include Jackie Robinson, the Dalai Lama, Mother Teresa and Dr. Michael DeBakey, who perfected the heart transplant. You could quibble over whether a golfer deserves to be in such august company, but if Charles Schulz and Frank Sinatra could get it -- and they have -- then surely Arnie belongs as well.
So, bravo to both gentlemen -- Arnie for receiving the award, and Paul for not compromising his principles. Still, when Arnie is making his list of congressmen he'll be inviting to join him on the course, I've got a feeling we can go ahead and slot Rep. Paul at No. 423.
Devil Ball is a golf blog edited by Jay Busbee. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Nov 20 2009
Posted Nov 16 2009
Posted Nov 16 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
177 Comments
1 - 25 of 177
Report Abuse
...both are true American Heroes who stand on principle, of which this country was founded. We need more Americans like them!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
His political views may not be perfect (although close), but his integrity is second to none.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Judging by your moniker I think it's safe to say you're thinking with your bleeding heart and not your head.
Report Abuse
Rush has to think he's a whack job because RP's social views are not in line with the conservative base.
Far from a hack.
Report Abuse
Gunga galunga. Gunga gunga galunga.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Apologies for the kneejerk reaction, but I do disagree with the award for Arnie.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
A: Maybe the family of Casey Martin, the guy who sued to ride in a cart on the PGA Tour. Chief among those opposed to the idea... you guessed it, Mr. Arnold Palmer. Whenever the show Arnie on TV, my wife still refers to him as 'that old douche who didn't want the handicapped guy to have a cart.'
Report Abuse
If you don't get the sarcasm - you probably support Congressman Paul. The problem with Paul isn't that he stood for principles - its that his principles are wrong. 422 others also seem to think his principles are wrong.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
There's a big difference between honoring a "private citizen" and a military soldier, so that comparison -- and most of the others -- falls flat. However, I agree that the granting of "Educational Grants & Scholarships" is similar to the award, and I'll bet that Rep. Paul is against them also (and I admire him for that).
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
it seems a bit out of proportion to penny pinch. By the way Mr.J.B. got it wrong about Arnie's list of golf invitation.
Arnie we know and admire is not the type of person who would put Mr. Paul at the end, rather in the front...
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
for a stupid award, how does that make him a hipocrite? Standing for your principles, wether you agree or not, is not hipocritical, thats what makes it a principal. Giving in because your worried about public pressure like most of the other congress members even though you don't agree, that makes you hipocritical. Learn what hipocritical means before you use it in sentence.
1 - 25 of 177