Frozen Fantasy: Over the line

  • Print

Get more fantasy hockey articles from RotoWire.com.

I’m sick of grown men acting like 2-year olds. Colby Armstrong(notes), Slava Kozlov(notes), Evgeny Artyukhin(notes), Alexander Ovechkin, Steve Ott(notes) and Tuomo Ruutu(notes). It was a bad week for undisciplined acts – hits from behind, knee-on-knees and slew foots. And only half were disciplined for their transgressions.

And then there’s Mike Richards(notes).

No supplementary discipline. Described as legal. But as cheap and dirty as they come.

It was head hunting at its worst.

Mike Richards is a gritty, hard-working player. But David Booth(notes) can’t talk on the phone or sit in front of his computer for more than five minutes at a time right now. Then he has to lie down. Five minutes followed by 55 just to recover. All courtesy of Mike Richards.

Purists say it was just a good physical play. He didn’t leave his feet. It was a shoulder, not an elbow. It wasn’t a late hit. But man, it was reckless. We have seen way too many players leaving the ice on stretchers courtesy of head shots. And some of them were carried off with career and life-altering injuries.

Sure, hockey players at every level need to keep their heads up. But there’s a huge difference between a good, hard check in the heat of the action and a headshot when the opponent’s guard is down.

The NHL needs to do something about cheap hits to the head. Hockey is the greatest game on Earth. And courtesy of HDTV, it’s finally starting to grow a decent American audience.

Trouble is, stretchers look even scarier at 1080p.

Now let’s take a look at who caught my eye this week.

Adrian Aucoin(notes), D, Phoenix (52-percent owned) – His foot speed is diminishing but the wily old vet more than makes up for that in wisdom and guile. And his smart play in the first month of the season finds him squarely in the list of top-10 Yahoo! defenders ahead of big guns like Zdeno Chara(notes), Dion Phaneuf(notes) and Shea Weber(notes). He’ll start to wear down – 14-year veteran blueliners always do. But right now, he can help you if you’re hurting in your own zone.

Zach Bogosian(notes), D, Atlanta (63-percent owned) – Bogy had two big goals Thursday night to bring his season tally to four goals and five points in nine games. Solid yet unspectacular but it’s clearly only a matter of time before this big workhorse sets out toward a 50-point season. Remember last year? He returned from injury and exploded with 11 points in 16 games over the last month. And he led all rookie blueliners with nine goals despite missing a third of the season. Bogy has Shea Weber written all over him and I think it’s coming this season. Stash him now if you have the room – goal-scoring defenders don’t exactly grow on trees.

David Clarkson(notes), RW, New Jersey (38-percent owned) – Wow! Clarkson surprised me last year with 17 goals to go along with his 164 PIMs. But there’s nothing to describe his outburst to start this season – try three goals, nine points and 18 PIMs in 11 games. He can’t possibly keep up this pace. But suffice to say he’s about to deliver a career year in points. Couple that with those tasty sin-bin points and you have yourself a very valuable right winger.

B.J. Crombeen(notes), RW, St. Louis (3-percent owned) – There’s only one reason B.J. is on this list and it’s not his scoring ability. He had a big week in the sin-bin department, taking on Steve Ott last Friday after the Stars’ agitator threw a knee when he shouldn’t have. Crombeen isn’t afraid to drop them with anyone and there’s a pretty decent chance he’ll deliver 160-175 PIMs this year. If you’re rolling three right wingers, he’s a great category booster. Just don’t expect any scoring heroics.

Shawn Horcoff(notes), C, Edmonton (34-percent owned) – That stench from out West this past month wasn’t the empty salmon can you put under your buddy’s car seat. Nope, it was the scent of big-money man Shawn Horcoff whose early play actually had me worried a beer-leaguer had assumed his identity. Well, Horcoff finally woke up on Thursday night and maybe that 60-plus point season doesn’t seem quite so impossible after all. Does he have the ability to deliver 55-plus points in the next 69 games? I think so. That kind of pace would make a speculator a very happy man.

Phil Kessel(notes), RW, Toronto (79-percent owned) – There’s a good chance this talented sniper will be back in game action Tuesday night. Check your wire and stash him right now, even if you have to put him on your IR. He immediately becomes the Leafs’ best scorer and at worst, excellent trade bait for the guy in your league who thinks he’s the second coming.

Filip Kuba(notes), D, Ottawa (21-percent owned) – Kuba is a seriously overrated fantasy defender. But the one thing he does well is tease for three or four week stretches. He’s back from injury and he nabbed two helpers Wednesday night. He’ll be expected to help on the PP and he’ll probably deliver decent numbers for a month or so. Grab him, use him and then leverage him in a deal before he falls off the map again. Because he will. He always does.

David Perron(notes), LW, St. Louis (31-percent owned) – A lot of pundits had this guy pegged for a 60-point season after his 50-point effort last year. But he fell on his face coming out of the starting blocks, recording no points, a minus-4 rating and eight PIMs in his first seven games. Ouch. But he has snapped to attention in his last three – three goals and six points with a plus-five rating. I just snapped him up to fill David Booth’s skates on my Friends and Family roster; you’d be wise to consider doing the same.

Andrew Raycroft(notes), G, Vancouver (9-percent owned) – I got to see a lot of Rayzor when he was in Toronto and honestly, I was neither impressed nor horrified. He’s an average, unspectacular netminder who was over-used in blue and white. But he was a whole lot better at Rocky Mountain High last season. Right now, he’ll be pressed into serious service with the Orcas given the rib injury suffered by Roberto Luongo(notes) and it’ll be a sink-or-swim situation. Still, the team in front of him isn’t half bad and Rayzor will certainly deliver decent numbers in their twine tent – just look what he did Thursday night. He’ll be better than a lot of goalies currently rostered in Yahoo! leagues. Grab him and hope for a short-term run.

Steve Sullivan(notes), LW, Nashville (9-percent owned) – Sully has been comatose so far this season but I don’t think it’ll last – he’s too good offensively to keep down for long. Yes, he’s an injury risk; he’ll always be one of those. But the peaks in his performance are sky-high when he’s “on.” And I think two points Wednesday point to a rising summit in his immediate future.

Alex Tanguay(notes), LW, Tampa Bay (46-percent owned) – I tagged Tangs as a preseason sleeper and how’d he repay me? He slept his way through the first several weeks of the season. I should have paid closer attention – this dude is a classic Rip Van Winkle starter but he does make up for it over the rest of the season. Well, coach Rick Tocchett juggled lines this week and Thursday, Tangs skated with Steven Stamkos(notes) and Ryan Malone(notes). Was there chemistry? You bet your boots there was – enough to brand the experiment an early success. Scoop him up now if you need a left winger – he’s soft but talented, and a point-a-game is hard to resist.

Antoine Vermette(notes), C, Columbus (13-percent owned) – Every year, I wax poetic about the virtues and upside of this talented and speedy Quebecer. And every year, he teases but ultimately ends up a flaccid disappointment. Not this year. He has finally found a comfortable home and he’s producing remarkably well on a squad laden with talent. He had a five-game, seven-point streak rudely snapped Wednesday night but I don’t think his stick will stay quiet for long. Center is deep but he’s in line for a 65-70 point season, some of which will come on the PP. There’s room on a lot rosters for output like that.

Back to head shots.

If the NHL was serious about dealing with head shots, it would have hit Mike Richards with a hefty fine. But it didn’t.

It’s time to break hockey’s so-called “code.” We sew stop signs on the backs of kids’ jerseys and for the most part, the kids get it. The NHL – I guess we should just call it reverse evolution.

Respect is a simple concept. But it’s clearly hard to demonstrate.

Until next week.

Janet Eagleson's lifelong love of hockey has grown into a four-year gig as a writer for RotoWire.com, and you can hear her as the resident NHL expert on GoTV Networks. Eagleson is a direct, no-nonsense fantasy analyst whose style once prompted a regular RotoWire.com reader to proclaim that only she and [Canada's favorite hockey blow-hard] Don Cherry had enough "onions" to say things the way they really are.
Updated Oct 30, 1:37 am EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

52 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Ross P
    52. Posted by Ross P Tue Nov 3 12:32pm EST

    Report Abuse

    youtube.com. search for "mike richards hit". have you used the internet before?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSILVbnofZM
  2. Ross P
    51. Posted by Ross P Tue Nov 3 12:31pm EST

    Report Abuse

    waaaaaaah. waaaaaaaaaah. somebody got hurt. waaaaaaaaaah. why don't they all wear facemasks? waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

    instead of trying to change all the rules for the game of hockey, why don't you and your ilk invent a new game. Maybe one where players skate around in tutus and the winning team is decided by who can perform the best on-ice rendition of the musical Rent. yeah! that oughta sell some tickets. Who wouldn't pay to see Jarkko Ruutu and Chris Pronger battle it out "Light My Candle" style?

    The game of hockey is fine. Stop trying to redefine what it is to fit your own personal worldview. It was a clean hit - it's unfortunate the guy got hurt - now let's move on.
  3. Doctor Leach
    50. Posted by Doctor Leach Mon Nov 2 8:27pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I have to agree with how screwed up it was on Mike Richards part with the hit on David Booth. He was meaning to really hurt the guy by lifting his shoulder the way he did.
  4. clayton s
    49. Posted by clayton s Mon Nov 2 4:08pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Next time you are going to use your entire preamble to discuss a single play, could you please include a link to a video of the play itself? I would love to give my opinion to this discussion (or at least generate one for myself), but unfortunately I have not seen the hit yet.
  5. bartelman
    48. Posted by bartelman Mon Nov 2 11:16am EST

    Report Abuse

    Janet, I have to say that your remarks about Richard's hit are completely outlandish. No offense, but you obviously don't know much about the sport if you think it was a dirty hit. The hit was completely clean and legal. It just so happened that Booth was on the wrong end of it. Maybe you should write about another sport if hockey is too violent. I know women's hockey doesn't have hitting, just try to keep foolish remarks about good play to yourself.
  6. sam l
    47. Posted by sam l Mon Nov 2 11:13am EST

    Report Abuse

    This is the first yahoo sports article that i noticed was written by a woman. Good article, good info, and good quips. Although while spot on, using "flaccid" to describe antoine vermette's game seems dirtier than when funston uses it, haha. And that richard's hit was the clearest incident of headhunting since todd bertuzzi crippled Moore. Again, good arcitle, we need more hockey talk.
  7. <i>edgejames32</i>
    46. Posted by edgejames32 Mon Nov 2 11:10am EST

    Report Abuse

    Wow Dom #36 lol....I don't doubt you played hockey or watched it for however many years, but you must've been playing like Simon Gagne or Danny Briere lol, not Mike Richards. Also who is your favorite player? Cammi Granato? Just cause you played doesn't mean you know the sport, I know alotta people that have their own cars and license but definately CANNOT drive!
  8. Mike117
    45. Posted by Mike117 Mon Nov 2 8:59am EST

    Report Abuse

    Who ever says Richard's hit was dirty and cheap has obviously never played the game. Once you have someone lined up, you can't just pull up on a hit ... he didn't go after the head per se, he was looking to make a hard hit on the guy. Had Booth not been crouched low admiring his pass, it would have been shoulder to chest and no one would be saying anything.

    I'm tired of hearing from armchair referees who think they know more than anyone else despite never having laced up a pair of skates... hey USA, if you don't like it, then go back to your UFC and Pro Wrestling.
  9. ChrisV
    44. Posted by ChrisV Sun Nov 1 8:05pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Interesting article, disappointing reactions. The NFL doesn't allow helmet-to-helmet or horse collar tackles, and football is a physical sport. To say it's okay to slam people in the head because hockey is a "physical sport" is a bit off.
  10. David
    43. Posted by David Sun Nov 1 5:22pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Anyone who thinks that hit is dirty didn't start watching Hockey until after the lockout.


    Remember when Hockey was a physical contact sport where not every hard hit was considered dirty? Christ people. It wasn't dirty, it was a clean hard hit and the dude just happened to turn his head at the wrong time. Stop thinking hockey is soccer on ice and watch some pre-Sidney 'oh no someone touched me let me flop' Crosby hockey games.
  11. Jordan
    42. Posted by Jordan Sun Nov 1 3:32pm EST

    Report Abuse

    And I do not associate any of your opinions with the fact that you are female. I simply disagree with your opinion. Richards was doing the job he gets paid to do, and did it within the rules set forth by Bettman. If he is afraid. of getting hit then he shouldn't be playing hockey.
  12. Jordan
    41. Posted by Jordan Sun Nov 1 3:26pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Dear Janet,

    I have to say that I completely disagree with you about Mike Richards' hit. Although the outcome of the hit was not what I would wish upon any person, it WAS a legal hit as defined by the NHL. These players know the risk of playing this game. A large majority of this game is based on physical play and the ability to intimidate your opponents on such grounds. David Booth is a great young player who was skating with his head down in his offensive zone. It is the Richards' and the Flyers' responsibility to protect their zone. All Flyers fans can relate to this having gone through many concussion-prone players (*cough* LINDROS *cough*). Richards is a great player who is not a dirty player. He plays hard and does whatever it takes for his team. I was turned off by your article when you called him a head-hunter. Richards is a stand-up player on and off the ice, and is by no means a dirty player. He was a Selke finalist and a great leader. Booth is a young player who needs to learn to keep his head up and no skate so freely through his offensive zone. It made me fairly angry that people see this hit as Richards' attempt to deliberately injury Booth. This is a ridiculous sentiment and anyone who says such is not a real hockey fan. Yes, the outcome was unfortunate, but we are talking about HOCKEY, perhaps the most physical sport of the four majors.
  13. Dark Helmet
    40. Posted by Dark Helmet Sun Nov 1 2:54pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Scott,

    I'm guessing you spend a lot of time alone, drinking beer and playing Halo 3? Try looking up the word misogynist in the dictionary. You will find your name next to picture of Nomar posted by "?" #33.

    Jeff........this is an opinion column. You cannot charge libel over an opinion piece. Your comments about JE are much more negative than her comments about Mike Richards. I guess she should pursue libel against you? Get real Jeff.
  14. Tyler
    39. Posted by Tyler Sun Nov 1 2:37pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Brian P
    29. Posted by Brian P Sat Oct 31 1:24pm EDT
    If Richards should have been suspended(which he shouldn't)the NHL would have had to execute Scott Stevens

    haha true dat...i still cringe when anyone mentions Eric Lindros...yikes
  15. champflair
    38. Posted by champflair Sun Nov 1 1:28pm EST

    Report Abuse

    This is hockey and you are supposed to hit. It was'nt dirty so leave it alone.
  16. Evan H
    37. Posted by Evan H Sun Nov 1 12:58pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Clearly you don't watch the Oilers very often. It's only a matter of time before Horcoff is officially moved to the second line. Sam Gagner is the first line centre the Oilers have been waiting for, just look at the production from Hemsky and Penner, since they've been skating on his wings.
  17. Dom
    36. Posted by Dom Sun Nov 1 12:38pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I love how this post has brought out all the crazy, white trash, trailer park comments. Female, Male, writing on sports doensnt change. What does change is that the moment something is written you dont like you automatically associate female emotion to the different view point. To say she should be sued, lose her job, and get back in the kitchen is absolutly ridiculous. There is one to many jealous guys in here who cant stand the fact that a women has a job that they obviously so desperatly covet. Kind of amusing actually.

    To the hit....it was dirty! I have played hockey and watched long enough to know that you have 2 choices. 1. Light the guy up (which Richards did) or 2. Skate in front of him on your back check removing him from the play. Both good choices but only sees both players skate off the ice. I drafted Richards in my pool and he is one of my fav players but he should have been fined at the very least.

    On that note, i wish you all luck in your retun from the 40's and 50's. Hopefully its a bumpy flight and you crash into a mountain.
  18. Scott
    35. Posted by Scott Sun Nov 1 8:03am EST

    Report Abuse

    I agree as well. Has she ever been caught watching her pass too long cruising along the middle of the ice. Cover figure skating or tennis if you don't like contact sports.
  19. Scott
    34. Posted by Scott Sun Nov 1 8:02am EST

    Report Abuse

    I agree as well. Has she ever been caught watching her pass too long cruising along the middle of the ice. Cover figure skating or tennis if you don't like contact sports.
  20. ?
    33. Posted by ? Sun Nov 1 5:29am EST

    Report Abuse

    Who the hell let women write articles about hockey???
  21. <i>kryptomlb</i>
    32. Posted by kryptomlb Sun Nov 1 2:28am EST

    Report Abuse

    Couldn“t agree more, Jeff...absolutly right....

    That article is useless
  22. Jeff M
    31. Posted by Jeff M Sun Nov 1 1:47am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Wow.... Janet, i think it's time for you to re-write this article and include an apology to Mike Richards for those nonsensical accusations. Richards plays the game clean & within the rules of the NHL and for you to badger him like you did is an absolute insult to not only Mike Richards, but to every hockey fan out there. If you do not reconsider editing this pathetic excuse of a sports column, then you should be sued for libel. In the future, if you continue to write sports columns for yahoo, please refrain from stating your moronic bias opinions. It's obvious that you have something against the Philadelphia Flyers or Mike Richards because there was nothing dirty or cheap about that hit.

    C'mon Janet in all seriousness what the hell were you watching????? I would really like to know the anwser to that question because as you can tell from all of these posts, you are clearly wrong! Richards was not head hunting. If you truley watched the clip & refrained from using your bias opinion, you would see that Richards was't even going to hit Booth in the head. At the last second before the hit, Booth turned his head directly into Richards' shoulder. If Booth had his head up and did not turn at the last second, Richards would have hit Booth directly on his shoulder. However, you obviously couldn't see that because you are a woman who cannot stop yourself from using your emotions insted of your intelligence (that is if you have any, which i highly doubt you do)

    You owe every reader of this article an apology for wasting our time in having to reply to this garbage and having to correct you. Thank you, and best of luck to Booth in his recovery process.
  23. <i>flogguy7</i>
    30. Posted by flogguy7 Sat Oct 31 6:10pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Head shot? What highlight are you watching! It was a clean hit and he had is head down. Wow women is all I can say!
  24. Brian P
    29. Posted by Brian P Sat Oct 31 1:24pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    If Richards should have been suspended(which he shouldn't)the NHL would have had to execute Scott Stevens
  25. c-yerx
    28. Posted by c-yerx Sat Oct 31 12:19pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Very sexist and rude...but true. Head down=lit up no excuses, no penalties, no fines.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight