Fantasy football power rankings: Offense

  • Print

You can find more from Michael Salfino at NESN.

Environment is the major key to fantasy football production. These rankings, updated weekly throughout the season, assess the foundation upon which fantasy football statistics rise (or fall). NFL offenses are ranked 1-32 in the following categories: red zone trips per game, third down conversion percentage, yards per rush attempt, yards per pass attempt, sack percentage allowed, rushing TDs per game and passing TDs per game. Also use these rankings to target weak offenses when selecting a fantasy defense for the coming week.

Fantasy Team Offense Power Rankings
Rank Team RZ/Game 3rd% YPC YPA Sack% TD/Run TD/Pass Total
1 New Orleans (6-0) 1 7 6 3 5 1 2 25
2 Baltimore (3-3) 8 4 4 11 6 4 7 44
3 Minnesota (6-1) 4 3 15 12 3 7 11 55
4 Indianapolis (6-0) 8 2 22 1 18 8 1 60
5 New England (5-2) 2 5 18 10 13 11 4 63
6 Green Bay (4-2) 11 9 14 2 9 15 7 67
7 NY Giants (5-2) 3 11 9 8 20 12 5 68
8 Atlanta (4-2) 16 6 26 13 4 6 7 78
8 Dallas (4-2) 17 17 1 5 14 8 16 78
10 Cincinnati (5-2) 14 13 12 14 10 12 5 80
11 Pittsburgh (5-2) 14 8 19 4 18 12 11 86
12 Miami (2-4) 6 1 5 23 23 1 28 87
13 Houston (4-3) 7 21 31 6 1 24 3 93
14 Denver (6-0) 21 12 13 9 7 21 16 99
15 Jacksonville (3-3) 8 10 7 16 31 4 24 100
16 Chicago (3-3) 11 15 25 15 8 21 7 102
17 NY Jets (4-3) 18 18 3 20 29 3 23 114
18 San Diego (3-3) 4 14 30 7 30 21 13 119
19 Philadelphia (4-2) 25 22 8 18 25 15 13 126
20 Arizona (4-2) 11 26 32 17 11 15 16 128
21 Carolina (2-4) 24 23 10 24 24 8 28 141
22 Seattle (2-4) 19 19 28 21 15 27 13 142
23 Tampa Bay (0-7) 29 25 17 28 2 24 20 145
24 Tennessee (0-6) 30 20 2 29 28 19 24 152
25 Detroit (1-5) 21 16 24 26 27 15 28 157
26 San Francisco (3-3) 30 28 16 25 17 19 24 159
27 St Louis (0-7) 26 24 11 27 16 31 27 162
28 Buffalo (3-4) 23 30 21 22 21 29 20 166
28 Washington (2-5) 20 27 20 19 32 28 20 166
30 Kansas City (1-6) 26 32 29 31 12 31 19 180
31 Oakland (2-5) 32 29 27 30 22 24 32 196
32 Cleveland (1-6) 26 31 23 32 26 29 31 198

Category Key:
RZ/Game = rank in red zone possessions per game
3rd% = rank in 3rd-down conversion percentage
YPC = rank in yards per carry
YPA = rank in yards per pass attempt
Sack% = rank in sacks allowed percentage
TD/Run = TD rushes per game
TD/Pass = TD passes per game

Executive Summary: Let’s focus this week on red zone possessions, the most important stat when assessing a player’s offensive environment. It factors in or directly influences all of our other key offensive stats.

The range is 5.3 trips per game for the Saints down to 1.3 trips per game for the Raiders. Looking at it another way, a back who gets 25 percent of red zone carries on the Saints is as valuable as one getting all the red zone carries for the Raiders. Of course the Raiders are a committee, too. Average right now is about 3.3 trips per game. I’m actually surprised to see that the Rams even get two trips per game. The Titans are shocking at 1.7 (tied with the Niners for 30th). You’d think that this is the major reason why LenDale White(notes) has lost so much value until you see that the Titans were below average in trips last year, too – 2.8 per game. Sell Chris Johnson and Frank Gore(notes) if you get close to preseason value.

The Eagles are another trailer that surprises. They’ve declined from 3.7 trips per game last year – 10th best – to 2.2 this year, which is 25th. Those big DeSean Jackson(notes) scoring plays (four straight games with a 60-plus yard TD) are a factor here. But proof that the Eagles can’t sustain drives is found in their 25th ranking in sack percentage allowed and 22nd slot in third down conversion percentage. If someone is buying Eagles offensive players now, I’m selling. This is not the consistent unit we’ve come to expect under Andy Reid.

Updated Oct 27, 2:48 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Fitzy
    8. Posted by Fitzy Wed Oct 28 7:48pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fair enough, man. I don't know that I *wouldn't* call him early Randy Moss, though? Seems pretty close to me...
  2. Salfino
    7. Posted by Salfino Wed Oct 28 3:43pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fitzy, I can't project 60-yard scoring plays. Those are anomalies by definition unless you're early Randy Moss. Jackson is a speed guy, strictly. It's a fluke. My over/under for 60-plus-yard scoring plays for Jackson the rest of the year: two (and that includes punt returns).
  3. Salfino
    6. Posted by Salfino Wed Oct 28 3:43pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Fitzy, I can't project 60-yard scoring plays. Those are anomalies by definition unless you're early Randy Moss. Jackson is a speed guy, strictly. It's a fluke. My over/under for 60-plus-yard scoring plays for Jackson the rest of the year: two (and that includes punt returns).
  4. Fitzy
    5. Posted by Fitzy Wed Oct 28 11:35am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Eh, when have the Eagles ever had a particularly consistent offense over the past couple years? Certainly not since T.O. was with them, so it's been awhile.

    Also, I'm a little disappointed in you being a #s guy and not giving D-Jax his due at this point. Dude's been involved in 6 plays in which he has gained 50+ yards (including one rush and one punt return), and he's scored on five of them. Again, that's 6 plays...in 6 games. I gotta ask, at what point in a 16-game season does that "aberration" become a legitimate trend? I mean, I'm just asking here...but we've gotta be getting close.
  5. Salfino
    4. Posted by Salfino Tue Oct 27 11:53pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Jackson is not going to keep getting 60-plus yard TDs. I said "trade" not get rid of. You can trade Jackson and Celek high. The Eagles do not look like they are going to be even a middling offense this year. What do they do well?
  6. Adam H
    3. Posted by Adam H Tue Oct 27 5:48pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    crazy New Orleans is so much farther ahead than everyone else...

    not first
  7. Dabibs
    2. Posted by Dabibs Tue Oct 27 5:07pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The problem with basing your fantasy decisions on these stats is, things can change. Imagine if you get rid of Johnson and Gore before Vince Young and Alex Smith come in and completely change things around! Also... Gore has been hurt which is probably WHY San Fran isn't doing that great.

    Get rid of Philly Players? Tell that to D. Jackson and Celek Owners. those guys are saving teams!
  8. Dabibs
    1. Posted by Dabibs Tue Oct 27 5:06pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    The problem with basing your fantasy decisions on these stats is.... things can change. Imagine if you get rid of Johnson and Gore before Vince Young and Alex Smith come in and completely change things around! Also... Gore has been hurt which is probably WHY San Fran isn't doing that great.

    Get rid of Philly Players? Tell that to D. Jackson and Celek Owners... those guys are saving teams!
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight