East Coast Offense

  • Print

Get more fantasy football articles from RotoWire.com.

Worthless Week 7

I can’t think of a more worthless NFL week than this past one. I think I lost all seven of my leagues, but I haven’t checked because my laptop died, and I haven’t had a chance to get my logins and passwords emailed to me on the new one. I got through in my main survivor pool, but lost three teams with the Giants – (I had already used the Colts and Pats in those pools thanks to a cowardly and ill-advised Week 1 hedge in which I took New England. I’m starting to think hedging in survivor is almost always a mistake). Moreover, I was terrible against the spread, and unlike my poor Week 3, when the games got themselves wrong, this one was mostly on me – even if Vegas is going broke, too. Finally, I’m going to have to hear it from Brad Evans and Brandon Funston on Fantasy Football Live, as I’m pretty sure I got a negative score in the guru challenge. And, of course, I’m a Giants fan, so their disgraceful home loss to Arizona would have been hard to take even had I not bet on and tried to survive with them.

But it’s not just me. The games were mostly unwatchable – Green Bay-Cleveland, St. Louis-Indy, New England-Tampa, San-Diego-KC, Jets-Oakland and Chicago-Cincy. Even moderately close games like Philly-Washington and Carolina-Buffalo were poorly played and unexciting. And when you’re talking about a 13-game slate, that leaves only five, and I’d argue only one (Miami-New Orleans) was good, and that ended because a ref called a receiver for not being lined up propery at the 6-yard line with one second left. The game was not in doubt as New Orleans was up two scores. Would it have killed him to let the Dolphins run one more play for the cover?

My bellyaching aside, Week 7 has resulted in another chorus of writers wondering whether parity in the salary-cap era is dead, and we’re witnessing a historically wide gap between haves and have-nots. It’s possible, but I still think unlikely. First, even good teams get blown out sometimes – remember the Giants beating the Joe Montana-Jerry Rice(notes) 49ers 49-3 in the first round of the 1986 playoffs? Even this week, the Bears were blown out, and they’re clearly not one of the league’s dregs. Second, teams, both good and bad, will regress to the mean – even the undefeated 2007 Patriots had a much tougher time in the second half of the season than in the first. And third, for teams with new coaches, quarterbacks, offensive coordinators, etc., the experience gained by playing several more games makes a significant difference, while Drew Brees(notes), Peyton Manning(notes), Tom Brady(notes), et. al are probably about as good as they’re ever going to be.

But as Nate Davis(notes) of USA Today notes:

From 1994 to 2006, the average margin of victory league-wide for any season ranged from 10.4 to 11.9 points per game. That jumped up to 12.5 in 2007 and 12.2 last year before spiking to this season’s average spread, 14.0 points.

My feeling is that while the prominence of the passing game has grown, creating more volatility the last few years (and bigger disparities in final scores), the 14.0 over seven weeks is an outlier, and we should expect closer to 12.5 the rest of the way. The other possible explanation – that five or six organizations have simultaneously become so much worse than the usual bottom feeders in the same season – strikes me as farfetched.

Either way, the lines for Week 8 are already unusually large given the matchups (Is San Diego really laying 17? They’re not even good! And Detroit laying 9.5 – is that even allowed?)

Why You Need Patience with High-Upside Players

I drafted Miles Austin(notes) in three leagues (didn’t keep him in any), Michael Crabtree(notes) in one (dropped him, too), but did manage to hold onto Shonn Greene(notes) and Beanie Wells(notes) in two, so I don’t have to grub for them on the waiver wire. With bye weeks and short benches, holding onto high-upside players who are not currently getting opportunities is difficult, but you should do everything you can to keep them. That means dropping David Garrard(notes) as your backup QB and doing your best to find a bye-week replacement on the waiver wire. Same with your backup tight end. Jeremy Maclin(notes) (despite two quiet games), Robert Meachem(notes), Roy Williams (I doubt the Cowboys have given up on him yet), Donald Brown(notes) and Darren McFadden(notes) are all worth picking up or getting as throw-ins in a trade.

Things to Take Away from Week 7

Eli Manning(notes) suddenly looks like the version from three years ago – making poor decisions and looking flustered. Hakeem Nicks(notes) scored another long touchdown on a lucky deflection, but did outrun the entire Arizona secondary to take it the distance. Steve Smith is still the team’s most consistent receiver. Mario Manningham(notes) is alternatively brilliant and terrible from play to play. There’s nothing wrong with Brandon Jacobs(notes).

It couldn’t look much worse for Pierre Thomas(notes) as Mike Bell(notes) took over down the stretch against the Dolphins. Now might actually be a good time to target Thomas as he’ll come cheap, and he’s still the best back in a high-powered offense. He might only see 10-12 carries a game for the next few weeks, but if that moves to 15-18 by the time your league’s playoffs roll around, he could be a difference maker. If I have Hines Ward(notes) or the Giants’ Steve Smith, I’d make an offer.

Alex Smith is worth a look in deeper leagues if you’re stuck with a mediocre QB. He’ll get a chance going forward, and a shoulder injury was partially responsible for his struggles the last couple years. Moreover, his college coach Urban Meyer expected him to struggle badly in the NFL at first, but to be very good eventually. With Vernon Davis(notes), Crabtree and Frank Gore(notes) out of the backfield, San Francisco has more passing game weapons than at any time since Terrell Owens(notes) left.

Even though he fumbled again, Steve Slaton(notes) is still a top-10 back. He’s the Texans’ version of Ray Rice(notes), which is a lot like Brian Westbrook(notes) in his prime.

Things to Watch in Week 8 Can Eli Manning and the Giants get back in sync against a tough Philly defense?

Can Denver keep it rolling on the road against a tough Ravens team – specifically, can Denver’s defense hold up against Baltimore’s balanced attack?

Can the Falcons hang in New Orleans and keep the NFC South competitive?

Forget about Brett Favre(notes) beating the Packers in Minnesota – the real test will be at Lambeau Field this week.

Beating the Book

Line: Broncos +3 at Ravens

Never mind their record, the Ravens are an elite team, losing in Minnesota on a missed field goal, losing to the Bengals on the last play of the game and losing to New England due to some ticky-tack roughing the passer calls. Of course, Denver hasn’t needed to explain away any losses, but the point is Baltimore’s an equal and needs the game far more. Back the Ravens.

Prediction: Ravens 24 - 17

We’re 4-3 in this forum on the season, 46-56-1 overall (3-9-1 last week). We were 12-5 in this forum last year, but 124-122 on the season overall. From 1999-2008 we’re 1308-1140 (53.4%, not including ties).

The full article comes out on Thursday morning.

Surviving Week 8

Unless you took the Giants like I foolishly did in a couple pools, or the Panthers, Week 7 was fairly uneventful as most of the big favorites rolled. (I had the Pats in this space and in most pools.) It’s been an easier than usual year so far in Survivor, but that could change very quickly as it did in Week 6 when the Eagles and Jets went down.

This week, the two slam-dunk games are the Chargers at home against the Raiders and the Bears at home against the Browns. Don’t get cute with the Cowboys at home against Seattle, and definitely don’t be crazy enough to “use up” the Lions at home against the Rams. Between the Chargers and Bears, I’ll probably go San Diego because I’d be less surprised to see Derek Anderson(notes) play a competent game than JaMarcus Russell(notes). Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind when the full article comes out Thursday night.

Chris Liss is the Managing Editor at RotoWire.com, a contributor to Yahoo! Sports' Fantasy Football Live, and author of Beating the Book. He grew up in New York City and has rooted for the Giants his entire life. His fantasy football documentary, "Sundays Are For Football", is coming soon.
Updated Oct 28, 2:49 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

17 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Brandon F
    17. Posted by Brandon F Mon Nov 2 9:23am EST

    Report Abuse

    Good call on the Cardinals, Chris. I'm glad I stuck with the Bears.
  2. Brandon F
    16. Posted by Brandon F Mon Nov 2 9:23am EST

    Report Abuse

    Good call on the Cardinals, Chris. I'm glad I stuck with the Bears.
  3. Dan
    15. Posted by Dan Sat Oct 31 1:36am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey im in some deep trouble this week, I have to decide Between Hartline and Amendola.. OMG. 3 starting wideouts on bye and im already starting half injured Cotchery. 9 bye weeks in all lol
  4. Brandon F
    14. Posted by Brandon F Fri Oct 30 10:43am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thanks for the responses, Chris; appreciate it.
  5. RotoWire_Liss
    13. Posted by RotoWire_Liss Fri Oct 30 3:28am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I can see a case for the Cards, but I think the Panthers - if they ever click - are more dangerous than the Raiders. And you never know when a team is going to get in sync one week.
  6. Brandon F
    12. Posted by Brandon F Thu Oct 29 6:24pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yep, I totally understand, which is why I have been re-evaluating my picks every week anyway. While looking ahead, I still focus most on the current week, just to make it through, especially in a seemingly tough one. Even though this seems like hte last week to use the Colts safely, I am staying away from that game. I was just curious as to why the Cardinals aren't viewed as a top pick, especially given what the Chargers did against the Raiders in week one.
  7. RotoWire_Liss
    11. Posted by RotoWire_Liss Thu Oct 29 12:42pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Brandon - I almost never look ahead in survivor for three reasons. (1) You lower your chances of winning this week; (2) The team you're saving might be far worse than you thought it would be (or the team they're playing that week a lot better); and (3) Even if the team you would have saved is in fact a double-digit favorite, if they're by far the best choice for that week, then most people likely will have done the same. And if that team does lose (which any team can), then the payoff by being on a more risky team that gets through will be huge. Whereas if you had the better team available, the payoff would be small if they got through. So I take it week to week and deal with next week when it comes. For that reason, I will take what I think is the surest thing on the board.
  8. Brandon F
    10. Posted by Brandon F Thu Oct 29 12:32am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I second the thought about the great column because it covers reality and fantasy very well. My favorite part is always at the bottom, but I usually still read the rest of it first. I am wondering why you did not mention the Cardinals as a good survivor pick. I was thinking about the Lions, but they could be "saved" for a tough week 11. This is probably the last week I will have a chance to use the Colts based on their schedule and clinching, but the 49ers are too unpredictable. I'm staying away from the divisional game, so it comes down to Bears and Cardinals for me, neither of which I have plans to use later, at the moment. I like how ESPN allows you to plot out your whole schedule for the season on their "Eliminator" but I have probably changed some picks there every week.
  9. NJ
    9. Posted by NJ Thu Oct 29 12:02am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, i agree, I wouldn't trade brown for moreno straight up, it just seems like when you throw in gonzalez too it could be a good move
  10. RotoWire_Liss
    8. Posted by RotoWire_Liss Wed Oct 28 9:54pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    It could be running up the scores, but my feeling is that 12-12.5 is the new norm either due to that or just more passing in general which leads to big plays for both the offense and defense. But 14 is a big jump for one year, so I think it'll revert in the second half... good luck on the Thomas trade - I think it's the right *kind* of move to make regardless of how it pans out. I'd start Smith, Williams and Warner personally... As for Moreno-Brown, it really depend on your depth. If they're bench players, I can see it, and I'd agree Brown has more upside. But Moreno's getting more looks, and Denver is playing defense and protecting leads. And it's not like Moreno's some stiff with no explosiveness even though Buckhalter has outplayed him to date. It's a gamble, and one that could pan out especially in the playoffs - as pointed out - but it depends on your depth... And thanks for the nice words about the column.
  11. NJ
    7. Posted by NJ Wed Oct 28 8:38pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Thanks for the response fitzy, that's just what I was thinking too, they might not bench gonzalez either since he has played so little this season. Its a bit tough to give up moreno but after watching a few games I don't really see him as a super-high upside guy, he could be a 10-17pt/game with enough touches but their offense isn't explosive enough to expect multiple td games.
  12. Fitzy
    6. Posted by Fitzy Wed Oct 28 8:29pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I know you didn't ask me, but I think that's a great move, NJ. Really gets you highly invested in what should be the key components of the Indy offense down the stretch run for fantasy playoffs. Assuming Indy clinches everything early (which is a possibility), those are still guys that would still probably play (figure they'd be most likely to bench Peyton, Wayne, Addai, Clark, etc.). I think Donald Brown is exactly the kind of RB first-place owners should be targeting right now. I still think he has a very serious chance at overtaking Addai (due to injury or purely outperforming him), or at the very least cutting deeply into his carries. Moreno's a very nice young back, but the Denver backfield is cluttered, and doesn't offer nearly as much potential for scores.

    Agreed on Liss. Very smart guy, great articles, best advice I read on here (even if he did have a sh!tty week, lol).
  13. NJ
    5. Posted by NJ Wed Oct 28 7:25pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hey Liss, as someone who recently traded for donald brown (and who's opinion I trust) wondering what you thought about this trade. I give up Moreno and Garcon for D. Brown and Anthony Gonzalez. I am in first place in my league, so this would be a long-term reward situation. Thanks keep up the good work! you are best by far of yahoo fantasy folks.
  14. <i>migillutz</i>
    4. Posted by migillutz Wed Oct 28 6:42pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    For the Misfits. I would start Warner over Orton, Carolina defense are not what they used to be and the secondary is hurting. Your Running backs should be Williams and K. Smith, playing Greene could have its upside but Miami will control clock and the Jets will play from behind, thats my opinion. Your open slot could be filled with Earl Bennett up against a sorry ass Cleveland team, if Sidney Rice is still available in your league what are you waiting for... Eddie Royal is such a gamble, Steve Breaston, Kevin Walter or Andre Davis might see some more looks if A johnson is out with the chest. Good luck...Anthony Gonzalez may soon be coming back and there is that MIke Wallace in Pittsurgh he is blazing fast and thats always good.
  15. MISFITS
    3. Posted by MISFITS Wed Oct 28 5:57pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hi Everyone,

    I have a couple of problems with who to start at Wide Receiver and who to start at Running Back. I'd really appreciate any and all input and suggestions!

    Thanks in advance,

    Big Steve in NYC

    I need to start 2 RB's:

    Deangelo Williams at Arizona
    Kevin Smith vs St. Louis
    Shonn Greene vs Miami

    I need to start 2 WR's:

    Mike Sims-Walker at Tennessee
    Eddie Royal at Baltimore

    I have an open spot on my roster to pick someone up. Any suggestions?
    I have Randy Moss and Santana Moss on Bye Weeks

    Lastly, would you start Kurt Warner vs Carolina or Kyle Orton at Baltimore?

    Thanks again!
  16. <i>prquinn</i>
    2. Posted by prquinn Wed Oct 28 5:41pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I actually recently traded Steve Smith (NYG) for Pierre Thomas in one of my leagues. Banking on him helping carry my team down the stretch (and to replace LDT, who looks slow this year again). So, good call on that!
  17. Dax F
    1. Posted by Dax F Wed Oct 28 3:25pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Might be worth looking at halftime scores instead of final scores. Perhaps the reason for the higher margin of victory these days is Patriots and other such teams not caring about running up the score in the final minutes of a blowout. Prior to the last few years, teams would lay off the accelerator if they were blowing out the other team, which may account for the lower average margin of victory in previous years.

    Other differences in game style may also account for such a statistic. I ultimately don't see average margin of victory as being a huge indicator of parity.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight