Handcuff hierarchy

  • Print

Preventative measures are commonplace throughout the NFL.

Protective equipment, pre-game calisthenics and dedicated Patron repudiation are just a few examples of how the league and some of its beluga whale-resembling players attempt to avert injuries/future coronaries.

Similar tactics are also regularly instituted in virtual pigskin drafts.

Host a fantasy event for a few drunkards in your newly finished basement without rolls of plastic sheeting and permanent carpet stains are unavoidable.

Though preparation for drunken mishaps is of considerable importance, nothing is more critical than carrying a pair of handcuffs on draft night. Fastening/hog-tying/super-gluing your prized No. 1 back to his backup is an insurance policy many owners are willing to pay a premium for. To some, owning a historically brittle back without a safety net is a perilous game laced with potentially painful consequences.

Photo
Draft Brian Westbrook(notes) this season and electric rookie LeSean McCoy(notes) better be attached at the hip
(US Presswire)
Brian Westbrook owners who don’t invest a middle-round pick in rookie LeSean McCoy this season are essentially playing Russian roulette.

In recent years, the two-time Pro Bowl selection has been one of fantasy’s most lethal contributors. Among rushers he’s finished in the top three in fantasy points per game in standard scoring leagues in three consecutive seasons. Averaging 64 receptions per year over that same span, he’s also been godlike in PPR formats.

But for arguably the most versatile back in the game, it will be extremely difficult to stiff arm Father Time in ’09.

Westbrook turns 30 before Week 1. It’s extremely rare for backs in the twilight of their careers to post a banner campaign. Flipping through the NFL annals, only 14 plowshares aged 30 or older have surpassed 1,200 yards rushing in a season. Examples of rapid deterioration among elite advanced-aged rushers are countless – Marshall Faulk(notes), Shaun Alexander(notes) and Edgerrin James(notes) are just a few recent examples. Considering the Eagles’ tugboat has never played a full 16-game slate, drafting him in Round 1 is unquestionably an enhanced risk.

Enter McCoy.

Idolizing Donovan McNabb(notes) as a teenager growing up in nearby Harrisburg, Pa., the second round pick from Pitt is ecstatic to be wearing the colors of his beloved team. The Philadelphia coaching staff is equally giddy about the youngster’s skills package.

Despite his “Shady” nickname, there is nothing dark or ominous about McCoy’s prospects. Equipped with hawkeyed vision, tacky hands, a powerful initial burst and high football IQ, he has a skill set that meshes perfectly with Andy Reid’s West Coast system. Throw in Philly’s rock solid offensive line and terrific passing attack, and his fantasy potential is massive. Frankly, based on his 107.0 ADP, he could be the biggest steal of your draft.

Though Eagles camp opened less than a week ago, team insiders and coaches have already raved about the kid’s striking abilities. Per offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg:

“He’s a pretty sharp guy. Now we ask the running back position to do an awful lot. He’s still working through some things, but he’s really a bright young man. I do think that by, let’s say the middle of training camp, he should be pretty comfortable. It appears that, that is the way it’s going.”

Pass-blocking will be McCoy’s primary obstacle. If he can develop quickly in that department, he will undoubtedly increase his chances to earn an impact-worthy workload. Because of his physical talents, intelligence and general malleability, he possesses the qualities to emerge an RB2 producer at some point this season.

However, with Westbrook’s recovery reportedly ahead of schedule, it appears McCoy will be limited to 8-12 touches per contest initially. Still, Westbrook’s graybeard age and injury-tainted past are fateful characteristics. Odds are favorable McCoy will be thrust into a starting role at some point this season. For that reason alone, owners willing to invest valuable coin into the Eagles backfield better not forget the shackles on draft night.

Fearless Forecast: 163 rushing attempts, 733 rushing yards, 38 receptions, 300 receiving yards, 5 total touchdowns


Whether you step into a room physically or virtually this season, review and follow these three simple rules to handcuffing:

1. Only handcuff top-20 backs.

2. Don’t be scared to reach a round early for a handcuff. Bring a list of ADP values to your draft to gauge when it’s appropriate to break out the irons.

3. Turnabout is fair play in handcuffing. If someone steals your guy, return the favor by snatching his later on. Having plenty of bargaining chips and additional depth at fantasy’s most crucial position is always crucial.

Excluding most tugboats involved in clear-cut platoons or muddied backfields – Chris Wells(notes)/Tim Hightower, Ray Rice(notes)/Willis McGahee/Le’Ron McClain(notes), DeAngelo Williams(notes)/Jonathan Stewart, Sammy Morris(notes)/Laurence Maroney/Fred Taylor(notes)/Kevin Faulk, Willie Parker(notes)/Rashard Mendenhall, Chris Johnson/LenDale White and Marshawn Lynch/Fred Jackson – here are this season’s top 25 RB handcuffs.

Handcuff Hierarchy
RKPlayerTMADP12RDOddsOutlook
1LeSean McCoyPhi107.08.93:2The real Slim Shady is about to stand up. Averaged 4.8 ypc and 127.9 total ypg in sophomore season at Pitt last year – don’t be a Hatfield.
2Donald Brown(notes)Ind84.77.12:1Just signed versatile rookie will push fragile Joseph Addai(notes) for carries, though the exact number is unknown. Anticipate a minimum of 10-12 carries initially.
3Felix Jones(notes)Dal80.46.73:1Otherworldly 8.9 ypc on 30 carries last season glimpse into mammoth upside. Expected expanded role, especially in passing game, could vault him into RB2/3 category by midseason, assuming he fends off Tashard Choice(notes) and avoids injuries.
4Shonn Greene(notes)NYJ164.713.75:1Former Iowa back heir apparent to ancient Thomas Jones(notes). Per Rex Ryan, could be immediately used as a fourth quarter closer. Value will be in-game dependent, but could prove deadly against soft opponents.
5Darren Sproles(notes)SD89.57.58:1 Pocket rocket’s spectacular Week 17 (14-115, 2-17, 2 TDs) shows promise, but diminutive stature still a concern. Rookie Gartrell Johnson(notes) could emerge as true handcuff with strong preseason.
6Jerious Norwood(notes)Atl164.113.712:1If the 370 carries curse strikes down Michael Turner(notes), the Mississippi Missile will be ready for launch. Excellent hands and lightning-quick wheels underappreciated. He’s averaged 5.8 ypc on 297 career carries.
7James DavisCle209.317.412:1With Geritol Jamal on precipice of 30-threshold, the rookie is in a prime position to become fantasy viable. Browns’ new-look, one-cut-and-go scheme an ideal fit for his skill set. Plus, he’s already turning heads.
8T.J. Duckett(notes)Sea203.416.915:1Thunder Jelly primed for vulture role in Seattle’s healthy, likely improved offense. If the cards fall right, he could be a miniature Lendale of sorts this season – 8-10 TDs not unfathomable.
9Ahmad Bradshaw(notes)NYG143.011.918:1 Brandon Jacobs’(notes) susceptibility to plaguing setbacks increases speedy Bradshaw’s starting possibility. Andre Brown(notes) will also be involved, but dynamite career 6.1 ypc salivating.
10Chester Taylor(notes)Min122.110.225:1Adrian Peterson’s vulnerability to nicks and scrapes labels the Minnesota Moses a marquee crutch, especially in PPR formats. Barring an injury to the Purple Jesus, anticipate another 150-170 touches.
11Michael Bush(notes)Oak188.415.725:1Touches in Raiders’ three-pronged attack likely to grow. His all-around qualities and minimal wear are pluses over Justin Fargas(notes). Averaged 4.4 ypc in ’08.
12Correll Buckhalter(notes)Den151.512.630:1Currently splitting first team carries with LaMont Jordan(notes). If Knowshon Moreno’s(notes) holdout extends deep into the exhibition season, Buck could wrest away double-digit touches early on.
13Glen Coffee(notes)SF208.317.450:1Sweet-smelling aroma emanating from rookie already in camp. Frank Gore’s(notes) expected increased workload spikes chances for injury. Juicy late-draft option.
14Earnest Graham(notes) TB107.68.950:1 Return of Cadillac Williams complicates projected role, but Bucs will be a very physical squad on the ground despite the effeminate throwback pastels. Veteran could emerge as goal-line option, but mid-round ADP proves he’s overvalued.
15Rashad Jennings(notes)JacNA26+60:1Tank-like Liberty product expected to battle with Greg Jones(notes) and Chauncey Washington(notes) for backup job. Bruising inside running style could poach a handful of goal-line touches.
16Ricky Williams(notes)Mia125.610.575:1Quirky future massage therapist/holistic medicine purveyor in tremendous shape. But unless the injury imp strikes Ronnie Brown(notes), 160-180 touches likely.
17Kevin Jones(notes)Chi208.717.480:1Ron Turner’s desire to reduce Matt Forte’s workload, particularly through the air, benefits the former 1,000-yard rusher. Roughly 8-12 touches per contest probable.
18Jamaal Charles(notes)KC170.314.280:1Larry Johnson’s(notes) behavioral concerns/limited tread, gives the former Texas standout fair odds of becoming an impact player. Impressive 5.3 ypc, 27 receptions last season.
19Brandon Jackson(notes)GB208.617.4100:1Brick Cheese has always been a favorite of Mike McCarthy, but Ryan Grant(notes) continues to block opportunity. Packers beat writers are astonished by his calves.
20Ladell Betts(notes)Was204.417.0100:1Remarkable toughness and durability of Clinton Portis(notes) has kept Betts in shadows. But the depth-chart topper’s 742 total touches over past two years a possible precursor to injury. Don’t forget Betts’ magical ’06 late-season run.
21Brian Leonard(notes)CinNA26+250:1Locked in a stiff competition with Kenny Watson(notes) and DeDe Dorsey(notes) for secondary duties behind Cedric Benson(notes). Versatility and tenacious demeanor should prevail.
22Mike Bell(notes)NONA26+250:1Former Lucifer Shanahan man-crush, currently battling dark-horse Lynell Hamilton(notes) for No. 3 spot behind Pierre Thomas(notes) and Reggie Bush(notes). Winner could steal away occasional goal-line touches.
23Maurice Morris(notes)Det209.817.5350:1Unchallenged No. 2 behind Kevin Smith(notes) for the Hello Kitties, Morris will spell the incumbent sporadically. Accumulated a commendable 77.8 rypg in five starts with Seattle last season.
24Chris BrownHouNA26+500:1Definition of “injury prone,” Brown, who has played more than 12 games in season just once, will complement Steve Slaton(notes) in some short-yardage situations.
25Antonio Pittman(notes)StLNA26+500:1Exchanging blows with Kenneth Darby(notes) for No. 2 rights behind Steven Jackson. Compiled a forgettable 61 typg, 3.5 ypc in five starts a year ago.

ADP = Courtesy of MockDraftCentral
12RD = Average round drafted in a 12-team league set-up
Odds = Chances a player will start at least one game in ’09

Brad "The Big Noise" Evans has obsessed about his fantasy teams since the days when Jeff George had value. Yahoo! Sports fantasy’s resident baseball, football and bracketology expert, Brad also lends advice on the two-time Emmy-nominated webcast "Fantasy Football Live" each NFL Sunday. Send Brad a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.
Updated Aug 5, 1:15 pm EDT
digg del.icio.us
more

49 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Rob Mon Aug 17, 2009 07:48 am PDT Report Abuse
    Slaton isn't on the same team as Warner.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    footlongs Mon Aug 10, 2009 07:26 am PDT Report Abuse
    the back and forth between David and Alec is some of the funniest stuff I've read in quite some time.
    I was just flabbergasted, but enjoyed it immensly.
    thank you both.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sun Aug 09, 2009 07:36 pm PDT Report Abuse
    David, so far you're receiving an F on your assignment. Please hit up a dictionary and get back to me.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    jtmoore1995 Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:01 pm PDT Report Abuse
    HEY I HAVE A 12 team league 20 man roster that starts. 2QB, 3WR, 2RB, 1TE, 1K, 1DEF. My players are Cards
    1. (5) Larry Fitzgerald
    2. (16) Pierre Thomas
    3. (25) Marques Colston
    4. (36) Matt Ryan
    5. (45) Lee Evans
    6. (56) Felix Jones
    7. (65) Trent Edwards
    8. (76) Zach Miller
    9. (85) Rashard Mendenhall
    10. (96) Le'Ron McClain
    11. (105) Steve Breaston
    12. (116) Ray Rice
    13. (125) Miles Austin
    14. (136) Brent Celek
    15. (145) Pat White
    16. (156) Miami
    17. (165) Arizona
    18. (176) Jerious Norwood
    19. (185) Juaquin Iglesias
    20. (196) Matt Bryant

    What do you guys think about my running back and wides. I have a couple of handcuffs and people want them what should I get if I give up a hancuff?I am looking toward getting Warner and wouldn't mind Slaton who is on the same team as Warner give me your thoughts of trades or what i should do
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:04 am PDT Report Abuse
    Alec,
    By omitting the conditions under which a strategy is less effective or even not applicable, a person DOES tacitly "advocate" that strategy in all circumstances. I'll let you get back to your high school homework...
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    JamesA Sun Aug 09, 2009 09:56 am PDT Report Abuse
    "Don’t be scared to reach a round ".... gotta love ffootball
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sun Aug 09, 2009 09:50 am PDT Report Abuse
    "This article, as in articles past on the same subject, contains absolutely ZERO discussion on the circumstances under which handcuffing makes sense and those where it doesn't. As such, the article advocates this strategy for all players and formats since there is not a single sentence discouraging anyone from applying it in any situation."

    By the way, your assignment for this season is to learn the definition of "advocate". Not mentioning something is not the same thing as advocating it.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sun Aug 09, 2009 09:29 am PDT Report Abuse
    "since you are unable to comprehend the point of the article or the comments criticizing it"

    HAHA! Whatever you say bro, good luck this season
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Sun Aug 09, 2009 09:23 am PDT Report Abuse
    Alec,
    This article, as in articles past on the same subject, contains absolutely ZERO discussion on the circumstances under which handcuffing makes sense and those where it doesn't. As such, the article advocates this strategy for all players and formats since there is not a single sentence discouraging anyone from applying it in any situation. That is a HUGE problem for an advice column since the less-experienced fantasy players place more stock in experts' opinions than those of us that have a better idea of what we are doing. And the only person "desperately looking for something to argue about" is you since you are unable to comprehend the point of the article or the comments criticizing it.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sun Aug 09, 2009 08:08 am PDT Report Abuse
    "and yes it DOES basically advocate that every fantasy owner should handcuff his stud RB no matter who is behind him"

    Where????? You're just desperately looking for something to argue about. Ranking the top 25 'cuffs isn't the same as telling people they need to draft them all. It's for informational purposes, some people will take more from it than others based on the deepness of their league. Lighten up.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Glenn Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:02 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I know you recommend handcuffing your top RB as a fantasy insurance policy, but is this wise in all cases? For example, in my 10-Team Standard scoring league I was able to get 4 RBs that you have rated in the top 25 (Williams, R. Brown, Addai, Lynch). Should I drop Addai or Lynch and pick up Ricky Williams? Should I try to trade one of them for Jonathan Stewart?
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Sat Aug 08, 2009 09:50 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Alec,
    He writes this same article every year, and yes it DOES basically advocate that every fantasy owner should handcuff his stud RB no matter who is behind him. Otherwise, these articles would merely point out guys like Brown and McCoy who are uniquely valuable instead of wasting his time determining where Cedric Benson's understudy ranks (Who cares? I wouldn't pick either of them...). Nowhere in his articles (or those of other handcuffing propagandists) does he specify that this strategy is of value only in less conventional circumstances or with certain players, but rather the concept is spoken of as a universal truth to be obeyed if you want to have a prayer of winning your league. I've played fantasy football since 1997 when we were pulling stats out of the Monday paper and breaking out a calculator to figure out who won, and I have played in leagues of all sizes and formats in the mean time. I know more than enough to recognize this as worthless "rule" in most circumstances, but it does bother me that an "expert" giving advice to less experienced players fails to be specific about when a certain strategy is more and less useful. That hardly makes me a "nitpicker".
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sat Aug 08, 2009 06:15 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Well it looks to me like you're just nitpicking. I don't interpret the article at all as BLINDLY advocating doing anything, and I'm sure the author would say the same thing. He's just providing some info that may be helpful to people under certain circumstances, especially people in very deep leagues where often handcuffing your RBs is more beneficial than drafting other players with little chance of having fantasy impacts.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Sat Aug 08, 2009 05:29 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Alec,
    Again, you fail to recognize my comments being a criticism of this article which essentially advocates BLINDLY handcuffing any and all RBs that happen to be the best one on your team. I have allowed that certain players and situations make sense as well as it being a more reasonable strategy for larger leagues or ones where rosters are huge. But the vast majority of fantasy players play in leagues with 10 teams, just two starting RBs and a bench of five or six players. In a league of 10 teams, every team should end up with 3 NFL starters and couple will end up with 4. No one is going to fill their bench with back-up RBs in order to screw the rest of the league because they will ALSO be worried about their own bye weeks. That means that unless the back-up to your RB is a stud that everyone wants, he will be waiting for you in the free agent pool just like everyone else's. I'm not sure how much clearer I can be for you. BLINDLY HANDCUFFING your best RB even if his replacement is crap is the strategy of morons. There is ZERO advantage to bypassing a better player for the one holding the clipboard behind your star.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sat Aug 08, 2009 03:41 pm PDT Report Abuse
    "Besides, handcuffing leaves you with a dead roster spot (until the starter goes down) that is probably better spent on guys that can actually play for you AND it hurts you TWICE in a bye week since BOTH players are unavailable. For the life of me, I can't figure out how this idiotic strategy has survived to this day. "

    That's what you said. It may not be your strategy but it's still a completely viable strategy in fantasy football as I explained. Far from idiotic. If you don't see this then I dunno what else to say.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:58 am PDT Report Abuse
    Alec,
    In my first post I detailed at least two examples of back-ups that I would definitely want if owned the starters (and even if i didn't own Westbrook or Addai, I'd probably still target McCoy and Brown late depending on who else was available). I have not made the case that you should NEVER go after your stud's back-up, merely that assuming it to be the appropriate strategy in EVERY case is ridiculous (such as ranking the top TWENTY-FIVE handcuffs! Ranking five or ten is plenty). Owning a crappy player that happens to back-up your #1 RB insures nothing other than minimal point production from that position. Add to the equation that more and more people are playing with flex positions in the starting lineup, and the viable options expand beyond other back-up and platoon players that you might be able to pick up from the free agent pool. Again, all I am saying is that you should draft your handcuff if you like that player a lot, otherwise draft other RBs that are better even if they are platoons or good players backing-up elsewhere.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Alec Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:27 am PDT Report Abuse
    David, you should never pass on a starting RB to get your handcuff, I think everyone knows this. But later in the draft it's generally safer to grab your stud RBs backup than some other backup running back. Like people have said it's basically insurance so if your stud goes down you're not totally screwed. Now maybe the upside is greater taking another backup, and not your handcuff. That's fine if people want to go that route. It's riskier and could backfire, but could also pay dividends. It just comes down to how you want to play it. You can't write off either approach as wrong or idiotic like you're doing.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    David Fri Aug 07, 2009 08:36 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Gabby's dad,
    Apparently you didn't catch the overall point of my comment. Blindly stashing the back-up to your stud RB is more often than not a poorer choice than going after better players who are starters, platoons or just better back-ups that are likely to play. Again, this all boils to the value of EVERY roster spot, eespecially the bench. If your stud stays healthy most of the year, then you're screwed by having his back-up eating a roster slot all season, a critical disadvantage during bye weeks. And if you really expect your #1 RB to be banged up early and often, why are you drafting him in the first place? The best "insurance" against an injury significantly hurting your team is to draft the best players possible and to beat everyone else to the studs that emerge during the season. Expecting Kevin Jones to salvage your season when Matt Forte goes down is pure lunacy.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    the guy Fri Aug 07, 2009 08:18 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I have just one question: where does Leon Washington factor in to all of this? I would consider him the handcuff to Jones instead of Greene, although rookie RBs are money. But Washington is really a lot better than people think and probably could be a 20 carry per game back, while not the biggest guy (5'8") he's stocky (208 pounds), as well as extremely fast in the open field (4.42 40 yard dash) with better than average agility (6.96 3-cone drill). He has good hands as well, averaging 10.4 fantasy points per game last year in PPR formats. They will pay him. He will produce. His O-Line is good. The more I think about it, the more the Jets' situation compares to the Ravens'. A three-headed monster with the aging vet, the TD vulture, and the all-purpose yardage back. Jones=McGahee (albeit with less downside), Greene=McClain (albeit with more upside), and Washington=Rice.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Gabby's Dad Fri Aug 07, 2009 03:39 pm PDT Report Abuse
    David makes some good points. However, guys like Norwood, Chester Taylor and Buckhalter/Hillis (whoever emerges) have been proven to be great players when thrust into starting roles. The point is not having dead roster spots, you have bench players for a reason. The point is that you don't miss the boat when your stud blows out a tire. It's insurance. Ideally you wouldn't spend $X per month on car insurance since you're highly unlikely to get into an accident...but (almost) everyone pays it. There are people like me who are smarter than you thinnk. We think 3 steps ahead. I'd use Fred Jackson's roster spot after week 4, to get a backup TE for week 5 or 6, then parlay that into a backup WR or QB for week 7,8,9 and so on. If you manage your roster accordingly, you'll always be competitive. Plan ahead and know when to cut the cord on the cuffs. My apologies for any mispellings.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    bushwah Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:32 am PDT Report Abuse
    Yeah, it should be Hillis up there, not Buckhalter. Hillis is a beast, he's been getting first team reps while Knowshon holds out, he is great catching the ball and he is versatile enough that he will be on the field as fullback quite often in addition to snaps at tailback. Even if Knowshon gets in camp soon and gets caught up, Hillis may still take carries from him, especially at the goalline.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Kevin Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:47 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Since it has been mentioned already, here is a link to an article discussing the merits/drawbacks of drafting QB/WR combos. You know, for what it is worth...

    http://rotoanalysts.com/03/05/2009/draft-strategy-aerial-combos/

    My general take is, if the price is right on both players I'll do it, but I never go into a draft with the goal to pair up a QB with a main target.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    DaytonaRay Thu Aug 06, 2009 06:25 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I target handcuff's based on the chance they'll start rather than whether or not I own the back ahead of them.
    For instance last year I took Chris Johnson in Rd10 because I thought Lyndell White would struggle with weight and injuries. Of course his owner retaliated by taking Jerious Norwood, but I didn't care. I figured White had a much better chance of going down or sharing than The Burner.
    I agree though... if I had Portis, Westbrook, or some other geriatric or injury risk, I may burn a pick on their handcuff, but I discount guys I think may break down, and usually someone else takes them before they drop to where I think they're worth the risk.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    erich Thu Aug 06, 2009 02:56 pm PDT Report Abuse
    glen coffee will really turn heads and gart johnson will be a nobody in 09.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Phil E Thu Aug 06, 2009 02:26 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I am in a 8 team league with 2 keepers I was going to keep turner and chris johnson. I have the 5th pick and i am going for a wr who should I go after boldin,calvin,steve smith,TO,colston,roddy white,wayne or bowe as my first wr pick? moss,fitz,andre will probably be gone as the other teams keepers.My draft is august 28th help me out if u could.thanks!

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.

Video Spotlight