Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
cant go wrong either way, Gronk already had his bye so that helps. Essentially would you rather start Forte and Carrier or Gronk and Yeldon.
My money is on Gronk and Yeldon.
Worth trading Forte for Gronk? Would be left with Foster, Yeldon, Duke Johnson jr and C Michael as my rbs. Its a 14 tm league so while it might look like my rbs would be hurting its not really that bad. Currently have Carrier as my TE.
Andrew luck is still an elite QB, it's too early to remove that title from him. If his struggles continue however you may have a case, but not yet.
10 Team H2H Keeper League 0.5 PPR (keep 10)
Here is my current roster:
QB - A. SMITH
QB - R. FITZPATRICK
RB - T. GURLEY
RB - M. GORDON
WR/BR - J. HILL
WR - CALVIN JOHNSON
WR - B. MARSHALL
WR - E. DECKER
WR/TE - W. SNEAD
TE - BENNETT
BN - P. GARCON
BN - CHRIS JOHNSON
BN - S. VAREEN
BN - N. AGHOLAR
BN - B. COLEMAN
BN - B. LAFELL
BN - S. JOHNSON
IR - BIG BEN
IR - D. COBB
Should i make this trade:
6th rd pick
3rd Rd pick
I will help out as well
I share John G's view on this. Julio is obviously not at full health, and if he is starting tomorrow on a short week's rest, the risk that it will be in the capacity of a decoy shouldn't be ignored. It will help your decision if they rule him out, so you can play one of your other options. Brown will see a lot of Peterson, and the situation with Vick is not ideal. Still, impossible to sit Brown imo.
maclin i feel won't do anything with charles out. to me though when it comes to my best players i dont bench them because I've done that before and its burned me. maclin with charles out i dont think it will be good. teams are going to dare smith to throw and i dont think it will end well. sanders however is good so thats a tough one.
"the fact that YOU might not bench him has absolutely nothing to do with his elite status" yes it does! he asked for our opinion. lmao dude its all opinion based. he wants to know our opinion. and if i think hes elite then hes elite just like if you dont then hes not. no facts what so ever are involved because the word elite is all based on opinion unless there are benchmarks required to be elite that i did not know about. you can't even tell me what youre definition of elite is because youre talking out of your #$%$ lmao
G I'll begin by asking you a question: what does the fact that you would never bench a particular player have to do with his being elite? That's what I referred to as "goofy". Whether it's "real life"...or we're talking "fantasy"...an elite player puts up elite production on a consistent basis over a period of time. Just because YOU would never bench a particular player doesn't automatically make them elite. You seem to be designating players as elite based on past production and not present production. I would agree that Luck (for instance) has elite skills, and last season there was a point at which you could legitimately begin to mention his name in conversations about elite QBs. But in the real NFL game, or the fantasy game...potential isn't rewarded...and production is. If a player is elite...he'll consistently produce at an elite level. That doesn't mean that if he has a bad game or two here and there that he's suddenly 'NOT ELITE'...but as is the case with Luck, I see no way you can refer to him as 'elite' at this point in his career, when you consider that he's been struggling since somewhere around the last third of last season, that struggle continuing this season...and now he's missed two consecutive games. Rodgers is elite. Brady is elite. And you could put up a good argument that a couple of other QBs might fit a reasonable set of criteria for being elite. But a QB that has been average at best for around 10 games...there's no reasonable argument for calling that player 'elite'. Once again, the fact that YOU might not bench him has absolutely nothing to do with his elite status, or lack thereof. Right now, as we speak...there are thousands of fantasy owners who continue to start Peyton Manning and would never sit him, regardless of the matchup, or how poorly he's been playing. Why? Because they're fooling themselves with the same faulty definition you're employing to define what constitutes an 'elite player'.
Lost J. Charles - have the number 4 priority. PPR league 1 point. Probably wont land West, but here are my options:
1. Char West
2. Theo Riddick
4. Knile Davis
id want west.
i like duke johnson more than crowell as a player for the ROS, but it's hard to say. standard league probably pushes the decision in favor of keeping crowell.
- Reply to Joseph S Oct 11, 2015 10:30 PM
in a vacuum yes, but according to your league (3 wr's, 2 rbs, and a flex), no.
you are already thin at wide receiver. id pickup jamison crowder if i were you.
should i trade maclin or sanders for todd gurley? is this feasible? the guy needs wide receivers and has a bunch of rb's atm.
.5ppr 12 man league 2wr 2rb 1 flex
hyde, lat. murray, randle, lamar miller, deangelo williams
julio, brown, maclin, sanders
Expert Fantasy Advice
There is plenty of value at running back this week in Yahoo Daily Fantasy Football. … More »
We run through the Week 12 slate from a fantasy perspective. … More »
Andy Behrens and Jason Klabacha dive into the three Thanksgiving games. … More »
If you're debating on your Week 12 lineup for Daily Fantasy Football, we're here to help. … More »