General Message Board
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:38 AM Flag
Yeah, makes the decision easy, obviously you wouldn't drop Tate for those two. You must be in a very shallow league, I wish I could get any of those guys in my league.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:36 AM Flag
No I think that at 33 FJax can't handle a full workload. While he will be effective Jennings will rule the Giants backfield when he returns, Williams has not looked good and Jennings is a solid if unspectacular 3 down back.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:35 AM Flag
Yeah, you can do that since you have Gordon coming back soon and Gio is out. Your WR;s are stronger than your RB's, though Maclin has been a target monster. RB's are generally tougher to replace so all things being equal take the better RB.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:32 AM Flag
No. Morris is not really doing much and Hill should at least keep a timeshare when Gio is back. I think you are giving up a lot with Jackson who is the only deep threat Wash has and Wash is usually losing. Smith has had his moments but I think he is on the slide right now.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:27 AM Flag
I'd probably go with Mathews but would keep Gore if possible and drop someone else. Gore is nothing if not durable and Mathews is certainly anything but durable, you might need Gore again.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:26 AM Flag
It is a fair trade but you are not strong enough at RB to give up McCoy. Bradshaw has been excellent (I own him in 2 leagues myself) but is TD dependent as the Colts insist on playing Richardson a lot, Gio may be out awhile and Andre Williams is losing touches by the week. You don't have any stud WR's like Jones but Beckham is on the rise as is Adams and Edelman usually chips in. I think VJax still is a decent if inconsistent WR2. Frankly your team is very weak unless it is a 16 teamer.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:22 AM Flag
Thats a bad trade. Cooks is close to Fitz right now though Fitz has played well the last couple of weeks. I never like owning Patriot players not named Gronkowski (and even he is risky). You just never know what Belichick will do, Edelman could get 15 targets or none on any given Sunday, same with Vereen.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:18 AM Flag
I would dangle him if you have another good QB, or dangle the other QB. Ben is red hot and while 6 TD's a week is not going to happen he will be elite from here on out- the other D's in the division are decimated by injuries, and Bryant has developed into a big threat opposite Brown who right now is the best receiver in football.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:15 AM Flag
That needs to be vetoed as it is obvious collusion. I don't like the idea of the commish getting veto power if he is also a member of the league, best way is to put it to a vote among the other members who are not involved in the trade. Try to find two new guys for next year, no one likes having guys trying to cheat. I mean Woodhead is out for the year, the trade isn't even fair just for Jeffery.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:13 AM Flag
Since you are so strong at WR I think that will work for you, you can just put in Watkins for Hilton with little or no dropoff.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:11 AM Flag
It would take Charles to get Graham and perhaps not even then. I would stick with Kelce, my gut is telling me he will deliver close to what Graham will the rest of the year, he is on the rise and even Andy Reid has figured out he needs to play more and Kelces snaps are finally rising over 50%. You wonder what coaches are thinking, why keep your second best player on the bench for over half a game?
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:09 AM Flag
Sanchez is a nice fill in for this week. Drop Oliver to pick up a kicker, you can drop Baltimores D to pick up a D next week. If you can get a good WR for Bush or Walker I would go that route.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:07 AM Flag
Anyones guess is as good as anyone elses at this point. I hear that Petersons people are looking to pay a fine equal to 4 of the games he missed in lieu of a suspension and get him reinstated immediately. That doesn't seem likely, I'm guessing he gets 4 games on top of what he has already missed. The NFl is cracking down on lawbreakers now, the party is over.
- Michael Michael Nov 7, 2014 9:04 AM Flag
I would drop him for Jackson unless you feel you need the handcuff to Mathews. Jackson should get most of the work when he returns, Oliver will just get 3rd down work.
- Michael Michael Nov 6, 2014 1:32 PM Flag
If you can add Sims without giving up much then do it. I think the Bucs have soured on Martin and Rainey isn't exactly Adrian Peterson back there. Having said that he is probably someone you would only use as a bye week replacement or maybe as a flex in PPR. Beckham is another story, once Cruz got hurt he was a no brainer WR2 with WR1 upside, he is the real deal.
- Michael Michael Nov 6, 2014 1:30 PM Flag
Yeah, that is an easy one, you are getting a huge QB upgrade and Robinson has been better than Vereen lately. Your WR's are still very strong with Thomas and Cobb.
Expert Fantasy Advice
Last dance, last chance for some winners. … More »
How early will Rob Gronkowski go in 2015? What's the plan for those who wind up Gronkless? … More »
This year, the top of the draft was a minor disaster, but the second round was a goldmine. … More »