• General Message Board

JACbauer 1 post  |  Last Activity: May 31, 2016 5:52 PM Member since: Nov 1, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • JACbauer by JACbauer May 31, 2016 5:52 PM Flag

    Been running a long time league, i open it to a league vote on trades, but strongly imply that a veto is not to be used simply because you disagree with a trade, but mainly for obvious collusion. That said this trade I just noticed today gives me pause.

    7th Place Trades H.Ramirez + V. Martinez + P. Fielder
    10th Place Trades Miggy+ R. Braun+ L. Martin (DL)

    I'm fairly certain these guys aren't actively colluding. But I can't help but feel that trade is largely inequitable. (The only shot in the dark I can figure is perhaps 10th place is expecting a bigger issue with Braun's neck and wants to cut his losses, but it's a stretch). Thoughts? I'm conflicted (and of course biased).

Expert Fantasy Advice

Sign up for Yahoo Fantasy Football