Who to Start Message Board
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 31, 2014 7:30 AM Flag
I'm sorry, have you or have you not advocated for multiple vetoes in the past few days? It therefore seems pretty damn relevant to bring up a veto you'd previously advocated that in retrospect was clearly wrong, to illustrate why vetoes outside of collusion are a mistake no matter how justified they feel at the time.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 29, 2014 10:00 AM Flag
"I'm not responding to the thumbs, I'm responding to the people doing the thumbing." Ok, does anyone here think that any thumbs are triggered spontaneously, divorced from human activity? Responding to the people IS responding to the thumbs, it's the same thing. And you're the only one at Yahoo that cares so much about thumbs. You're as obsessed with your thumb count as those you taunt are supposedly obsessed with you. More so, actually.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 28, 2014 4:39 PM Flag
Actually, you have. You've spewing the same rhetoric about other's supposed infatuation with you since 2010 (at least), with multiple people as your supposed "groupies". It's part of your schtick, rinse and repeat every football and baseball season.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 28, 2014 4:37 PM Flag
Interesting. Do you have any idea how crazy it looks when you respond, not to people or real posts, but to thumbs? THUMBS??? The difference between that and responding to yourself is pretty small, and in some ways is actually kind of worse.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 22, 2014 9:40 AM Flag
A professional psychologist might indeed be able to assess something like that, but a real professional psychologist would never talk about it in that manner, in this forum. Using your skills as a weapon to mock and hurt? No, I think not.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 18, 2014 10:38 PM Flag
John G, your whole argument is predicated on the notion that Gregory believes what he types. He doesn't. He's trolling. Pointing out that the "Multiple Accounts" claim is bogus is beside the point. Simply getting you to engage is his victory. Winning on the merits of logic or evidence is not the game here.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 16, 2014 10:25 AM Flag
He got 13 in this baseball thread:
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 7, 2014 6:56 PM Flag
"The Sad Truths of Internet Trolls:
1.Trolls are immune to criticism and logical arguments. True trolls cannot be reasoned with, regardless of how sound your logical argument is.
2.Trolls do not feel remorse like you and me. They have sociopathic tendencies, and accordingly, they delight in other people having hurt feelings.
3.Trolls consider themselves separate from the social order.
4.Trolls do not abide by etiquette or the rules of common courtesy.
5.Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
6.Trolls gain energy by you insulting them.
7.Trolls gain energy when you get angry.
8.The only way to deal with a troll is to ignore him, or take away his ability to post online."
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Oct 7, 2014 4:55 PM Flag
Mike, he's just trolling you. Don't bother. He doesn't seriously believe you have multiple accounts, he claims this of everyone (see the following link.... sound familiar?):
Expert Fantasy Advice
As we get ready for Manning-Brady XVI, let's look back at the history between the titans. … More »
A wave of fractures & strains has hit OKC, and no player appears safe. Among the uninjured, an obvious pickup has emerged. … More »
With an obscene number of fantasy stars unavailable, our crew will help guide you through the Week 9 muck. … More »
Get out the pricing gun: here's how one Yahoo scribe sees the QB and WR marketplace. … More »