Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 20, 2015 11:42 PM Flag
btw... for more than a year? I don't remember trading posts with you before this current season. How does a few months turn into more than a year?
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 20, 2015 11:33 PM Flag
Stop you, Strong? When have I ever said that I could, or wanted, to stop you from trolling? There's only one semi-effective way that I know of to shut down a troll, and it's not by engaging, ignoring, or any other actions that the users of any forum can employ.
Anyone with any experience on the web knows this to be true (or should). So if my pointing it out means I'm "making a fool" of myself... well, then we have a very different definition of that phrase.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 9:36 PM Flag
"YOU proved me RIGHT while proving yourself WRONG since you continued your replies to DS and he to you. Thus you fed the troll, which was the opposite effect that you stated!" ...the opposite effect that I stated. What effect did I state, that this was the opposite of? Your ravings have gone completely off the rail at this point... I'm serious, I haven't got a clue what the hell you're talking about.
You seem to be referencing some phantom post where I stated that if one engages a troll, they will disappear, and therefore by my engaging Strong and him NOT disappearing, I proved myself (or my imagined theory) wrong. But I made no such claim. Ever.
You certainly are doubling down on the disturbing sexual imagery. I guess I have to give you credit for fully embracing this dark (and gross) fantasy... way to commit, soldier! But I must point out... it's really funny that you're accusing ME of "becoming" a troll, since your brave swan dive into the world of ad hominem attacks bears far more of a resemblance to the lives-under-bridges set than anything I've typed here.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 9:09 PM Flag
Btw... top marks for going from zero to raving in 5 posts. Who baited who again?
Still waiting for you to reference where you "schooled" me. And waiting. And waiting. Yawn.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 9:00 PM Flag
Ah I see... attacking the poster when you can't discredit the post. I see a lot of taunts, but no actual argument. How... expected. If I'm the one who has been baited, why is it you that is frothing at the mouth, speaking nonsense, creating fiction, and being kind of (let's be honest) creepy?
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 7:41 PM Flag
Sadly, you seem to be misinformed: there is no prize for being the being the 1,000,001st person on the interwebz to confuse claiming victory with ACTUAL victory.
Sigh. Again... and it's so awesome having to repeat myself... where and when did you prove me wrong? Ok, so we've established that you didn't delete this phantom post where you "proved" me wrong. So where could it possibly be? Perhaps it's a post that you MEANT to write, but neglected to actually type out? Very strange. That's now two post of yours claiming "victory", but zero posts where that victory actually... you know... HAPPENED. And that (the thing actually happening) would seem to be key to being proven right or wrong.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 4:59 PM Flag
You proved me wrong, RL? When? How? Oddly, the event is not to be found in your posting history. Was the post where this happened deleted?
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 11:09 AM Flag
Are you assigning me homework? You are perfectly capable of viewing his posting history and perusing the various threads, observing for yourself where he sparks flame wars vs. where his personal insults are ignored / brushed off.
Your point that "responding to a troll only feeds the troll" is indeed proven. Congratulations. However, I never disputed that, so I'm not sure why you'd pat yourself on the back. Feeding a troll gives them a power over you (the power to provoke), it is true. However, this truism ignores (or omits) the fact that NOT responding ALSO gives them power over you (the power to silence), which they are perfectly happy with as a substitute in my experience.
"Don't feed the troll!" is one of the most common pieces of advice one will encounter when dealing with different personalities online. The widely held belief is that, when not getting the reactions they crave, they will just disappear into the digital mist, looking for other prey.... this is a myth. It's nonsense. In all my time in various forums across the interwebs, I've seen many trolls. Not once have I seen one just melt away when that advice was taken.... not one single time. By show of hands, who here has EVER seen a forum all in unison uniformly ignore a troll, leading to that troll never being seen again? Anyone? Anyone???
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 9:46 AM Flag
This reminds me of the 80s infomercials with the Chinese guy who berates the viewer for not being rich and turning that wealth into more wealth. "C'mon you idiots, I get a top 3 pic and select a league MVP annually... why can't you do that?!!!" Yes, because certainly we can always count on our sheer awesomeness securing us a top pick every year....
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 19, 2015 9:36 AM Flag
And more to the point, I would like to know Strong's first 11 picks from 2014, not just the 1st OR second round. In 2014 in my main league, Rizzo went in the 11th round, yet returned the value of a early to mid third rounder (ranked 26th overall for 2014). You can't tell me that you (or anyone) picked 11 guys in a row, all of whom returned better value than that, it's impossible.
And for 2015, assuming you haven't apparently hacked the system to score a top 3 pick as Strong does annually, exactly which "5 category filler" would you have taken if you picked (for instance) 9th overall, that would have worked out better than Rizzo? Trout, McCutchen, and likely Gomez were gone in most of my leagues by that point. Adam Jones and his whopping 3 SBs this year?
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 18, 2015 4:11 PM Flag
And once again, you are missing the point. When you assume Britain is "where he is", you are making a logical error. It is far more likely that he is a Canadian, living in Canada, and thus "the pond" is irrelevant.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 18, 2015 3:29 PM Flag
Have to go Upton there myself, next is Cruz. Chapman is dynamite, but with only 4 keepers a closer is not a great way to go.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 18, 2015 3:25 PM Flag
If you believe Duda trumped Rizzo in 2014, you're the only one who thinks so. Even Duda's own family would blush from making that statement. Rizzo outperformed Duda in every standard fantasy hitting cat except RBI.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 18, 2015 2:48 PM Flag
Sigh... "even if he is a Canadian living in Britain"? Isn't it the FAR more likely (and logical) scenario that he is a Canadian living in... CANADA? Unless North America is the wrong side of the pond.
Thus, your assessment would be incorrect.
- Crasstastic Crasstastic Aug 18, 2015 11:05 AM Flag
For someone who likes to tout logic and reason, it's strange that by far the most likely and logical reason has eluded you... which is that he is Canadian, rather than from "across the pond." He may be British, of course, but that is not the most likely reason.
Expert Fantasy Advice
Time to price all the running backs, with two well-known veterans at the top. … More »
Taking a look at Friday's DFC action. … More »
Francisco Lindor came to the majors on a defensive reputation, but he's been a superb hitter, too. … More »
We've got a few high-cost aces on the mound on Thursday, so you'll want some bargain bats to help sketch in those lineups. … More »