Commissioner Corner Message Board

Start a New Topic

View: Summary | Expanded
As: Threaded | Message List

Previous topic | Next topic

Trade-should it be vetoed

Maaz by Maaz . Feb 6, 2013 3:01 PM . Permalink

Before any news of CP3 returning came out, on 2/2, the following trade was accepted

CP3 for Dwayne Wade

No collusion. Should this be vetoed?
- 0 users liked this posts 2 users disliked this posts
- Reply
- Report Abuse
- Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
  
  Maaz by Maaz . Feb 8, 2013 1:53 AM . Permalink
  
  bump
  
  bump
  0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
  
  Reply
  
  Report Abuse
- Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
  
  1st Place by 1st Place . Feb 21, 2013 8:41 PM . Permalink
  
  No stress.
  
  No stress.
  0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
  
  Reply
  
  Report Abuse
- Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
  
  ChrisR by ChrisR . Feb 13, 2013 11:36 AM . Permalink
  
  I wouldnt be a manager in the league voting against the trade - so I would expect it not t...
  
  I wouldnt be a manager in the league voting against the trade - so I would expect it not to be vetoed
  0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
  
  Reply
  
  Report Abuse
  - View Replies
  - Re: Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
    
    Alejandro by Alejandro . Feb 14, 2013 12:30 AM . Permalink
    
    I see absolutely nothing wrong with that trade. Even with CP3 injured. His injury was neve...
    
    I see absolutely nothing wrong with that trade. Even with CP3 injured. His injury was never thought to be anything long term, and he was always expected back this month. Old Man Wade is just as likely to get injured from now until the end of the year as CP3. Looks pretty fair to me.
    
    0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
    
    Reply
    
    Report Abuse
- Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
  
  Lakers Fan by Lakers Fan . Feb 14, 2013 11:11 PM . Permalink
  
  No veto....I haven't compared their stats, but Paul was basically the 3rd overall pick...
  
  No veto....I haven't compared their stats, but Paul was basically the 3rd overall pick and Wade was agruably Top 5....both have injury risk....there's no veto here. Not even if you could prove any collusion....they are just too close for that to matter.
  0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
  
  Reply
  
  Report Abuse
- Re: Trade-should it be vetoed
  
  neil by neil . Feb 20, 2013 6:22 PM . Permalink
  
  I hate hate hate hate hate leagues that have owners that are so petty to veto any trades w...
  
  I hate hate hate hate hate leagues that have owners that are so petty to veto any trades without definite proof of collusion let alone one like nthis one that isn't even close to be lopsided
  0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts
  
  Reply
  
  Report Abuse
- View More Messages

Yahoo! Sports

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

Commissioner Corner Message Board

Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Yahoo! Sports

Commissioner Corner Message Board

Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Re: Trade-should it be vetoed

Yahoo! Sports

Also On Yahoo!

Trending Now