• Commissioner Corner Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • Jake Jake Feb 19, 2012 6:25 PM Flag

    Would you veto this?

    Seems like the commish doesn't wanna see your team in the playoffs possibly. Everyone knows rose will come back and play like the MVP he is. Jennings and Gooden will help the other dudes team in categories he probably needs help in. The commish should back off in this case.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Actually one of the best responses so far, but Gooden is out for how long, no one knows. It then becomes one of the leagues top 3 players for Jennings, lopsided. Potential does come into play and I suspect that is why other managers asked me to veto it. It is my job as commish to respond to their wishes as well as the two in the trade. Commishes that only listen to the trade participants aren't doing the league justice.

      • 2 Replies to A Yahoo! User
      • Where are you pulling this league's top 3 number from? Your ass? I know you probably keep a lot of stuff up there so it wouldn't surprise me.
        Rose is a great PG, but his fantasy value has been limited this year mainly due to injury.
        If you are going to completely dismiss Gooden from the trade review due to injury, then by that logic you would also have to dismiss Rose as well.

        Bottom line:
        1 team gets an injured PG that has potential to be great.
        1 team gets a healthy PG that has had top 25 value all season, and 1 PF,C that has potential to score a lot and rebound a lot when healthy.

        You are a chump.

      • And since on the league's board you said that most people were in favor of the veto on this post, and since you have locked me out, I DARE YOU TO POST A LINK OF THIS POST ON THAT LEAGUE'S MESSAGE BOARD.
        There are very few people on here that actually agreed it should be veto'd.


Expert Fantasy Advice

Sign up for Yahoo Fantasy Football