• Commissioner Corner Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • CWizzle CWizzle Feb 19, 2012 2:33 PM Flag

    Would you veto this?

    Hey commish, if you are reading this, so far there has only been 1 credible response. I think it was by Ryder I cant remember.
    But there have been other responses both for and against this trade that I hold no credability to. Some of the responses are crazy lol.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Dude, you say they hold no credibility, what a bunch of hogwash. What do you base that on, your knowledge? roflmao Apparently you don't think their opinion is not knowledgable, well glad I'm here to attempt to see it through realistic eyes.

      Also, the other poster said something to the effect of "he didn't realize that I was a manager and a commish". Now I ask you this, why would he say already if it was his first response post, huh? Sounds like to me that he "already" knew about the topic being discussed and he had responded once before, it is confusing, go read it and I'll bet you'll see the same thing "if you really want to". But I am not accusing anyone of anything, but I do look at the facts and then think about those pieces of information and try to understand what is really going on, it if is not the case then I'm sorry but it sure looks fishy.

      • 1 Reply to Khan
      • The responses I was talking about that aren't credible in my eyes are the one's that said they would veto a trade just because it would help them win. And the 1 that was saying I didn't know a commish could be a manager.
        If they don't know that, then why would I take their opinion into consideration about trade fairness.
        And like I said, there was 1 for, and 1 against the trade, both that seem un credible to me, so it's not like I'm trying to get the vote on my side by saying that.
        And I don't get what you are talking about, saying something is fishy.
        I don't know anybody that has posted on here, and I dont know anyone in our league. period.

    • That being said, see previous post, I believe my original response to you is about right on, half one way and half the other. But one of those says "trades shouldn't be vetoed unless collusion is suspected, I told you that those responses will be ignored. Your vote doesn't count either, so it looks to me that there are more people against the trade than for it. Good Job trying but it appears as though you have helped me confirm my decision, thanks.


Expert Fantasy Advice