Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
I have Kane and Landeskog on my rotisserie. They are clutch for hits and shots. Landeskog had 9 shots in the game the other night alone.
Both have put pucks in the net as of late. But overall, even though he is a rookie, I think Landeskog is a better hit producer.
Oh, and since our league counts stats like SOG, Hits, and faceoff wins, guys like Kane/Landeskog/Little are more valuable than they normally would be. I have a bunch of guys that just contribute points...I could use some peripheral stats too. That's the only reason why I haven't added Perron yet.
- 1 Reply to Chris
I have Kane and Landeskog and like both. It's a dynasty league so that may play into my answer a bit. Short term (meaning the rest of the season) I might give Kane an edge just because Landeskog is a rookie. If you need +/- then I might take Landeskog over Kane.
Personally, I don't think you could go wrong with either. I am a bit biased, but I hope this helps.
Would you mind answering my question titled "Need to drop one. Who's Your Choice?" Thanks.
Expert Fantasy Advice
Julio Jones, who hasn't lived up to the WR1 hype, will have another uneven effort this time versus Arizona. … More »
Latavius Murray, the breakout sensation of Week 12, should sink his teeth into the Rams. … More »
A look at fantasy players whose values have moved up and down in week four. … More »
Examining Odell Beckham's big performance and a look around the league in Week 12. … More »