Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
The trade is:
The team getting Nebakov is #1 in the league with shaky goaltending the team giving up Nebakov is #11 and has Huet and Roloson as other Goaltenders.
It is up to league protocol, but as its the top guy overpaying for the best player in this deal, you let it slide. If I were him, I'd do the same move if I was shoring up a major weakness Mason is meh, Savard can't seem to stay healthy, and Smyth has played above his head most of the season. Let it happen.
- 1 Reply to Porter
PPl who say you only veto trades if there is cheating have obviously never played in a league where there's a manager or 2 that just doesn't get it or doesn't care.
As commish, there has to be some form of process involved and named at the beginning of each season to deal with trade veto's.
The answer to your question would really be based on what you have established for your league.
no, its fair because if hes willing to give up that much for just a gaolie than thats their prerogative, plus savard hasnt been great all year, smyth hasnt been himself since coming back from injury and Mason is just a starting goalie, nothing special.....
not veto worthy
Expert Fantasy Advice
Another week, another Knicks guard on the fantasy radar. … More »
A look at fantasy players whose values have moved up and down in week 12. … More »