Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
-
H2H league : 14 team
Stats are : G A P +/- PIM PPP SHP GWG W GAA SV% SHO
Team A get:
Pavel Datsyuk (Det - C)
Milan Michalek (Ott - LW)
Henrik Lundqvist (NYR - G)
Team B Get :
Saku Koivu (Anh - C)
Jarome Iginla (Cgy - RW)
Cristobal Huet (Chi - G)
I think the trade is not faire? Is it or not?
Datsyuk >/= Iginla (I like more Datsyuk, but i thing it's fair)
Michalek > S.Koivu
Lundqvist > Huet
So this trade need to be voted or not?-
This trade really come down to the Gs. It all depends how you percieve Huet. I wouldn...
This trade really come down to the Gs. It all depends how you percieve Huet.
I wouldn't Veto though. -
Not Vetoable. One team upgrades Goalie sacrifices offense and the other team the opposit...
Not Vetoable.
One team upgrades Goalie sacrifices offense and the other team the opposite. Nothing wrong with that. Definitely not worth a Veto.
A Vote is fine, but not a quick Veto.
Michalek > Koivu ??? same sht imo. -
It's not really fair, but it's not unfair to the point you gotta veto it.
It's not really fair, but it's not unfair to the point you gotta veto it.
- View Replies
-
No way that trade should be vetoed.
No way that trade should be vetoed.
-
Huet in CHI should get more win - gamble but could be worth it. Datsuyk is the better pla...
Huet in CHI should get more win - gamble but could be worth it.
Datsuyk is the better player but there are more quality centers in the league than RW.
IF he has a quality C on his bench he can afford to give Datsuik away to improve his RW. He will probably drop Koivu and replace him on his bench for a better center.
Gamble but fair -
So you would veto it because it favours one team? That's just jealousy. Leave it alo...
So you would veto it because it favours one team? That's just jealousy. Leave it alone.
- View More Messages
-