General Message Board
you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
I have a question, why is it when a Dale Jr. fan is defending his guy, there seems to always be the words "would have" and/or "if" in their arguements?
"Jr. would have finished in the top 10 if so and so...."
"Jr would have won the points last year if that Teresa ....."
"Jr would have won the Daytona 500 if ....."
"Jr. would be the best racer if he had good equipment..."
and so on and so on and so on. It is a never ending cycle of "would have's" and "ifs". Earnhardt fans argue with assumptions as their only evidence, while Jimmmie Johnson, Jeff Gordon, and Tony Stewart fans argue with Championships and Trophies as their evidence. And still, you really can't make the Earnhardt fans realize how idiotic they sometimes look.