Draft and Trade Talk Message Board

Back To Board
Search
Advanced Search  
  • Subject Message Body
  • Topics Only Topics And Messages
  • Any Date
  • Within the range:
Start a New Topic
View:  Summary |  Expanded
As:  Threaded |  Message List
Previous topic |  Next topic

  • D12/Westbrook Trade...VETO????

    Justin by Justin . Jan 29, 2013 5:30 PM . Permalink
    Justin

    "THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT" STAT CATEGORIES ARE....FGM, FTM (Not FT%), 3PM, PTS, RBS, ASTS, STLS, BLKS

    D.Howard (1st Rd Pick) & P.Millsap (2nd Rd Pick) for R.Westbrook (1st Rd Pick)

    Is this trade Vetoable??

    • CWizzle

      Re: D12/Westbrook Trade...VETO????

      CWizzle by CWizzle . Jan 29, 2013 5:40 PM . Permalink

      Not veto worthy. I'd much rather have Howard/Milsap but it doesn't seem like any c...

      Not veto worthy. I'd much rather have Howard/Milsap but it doesn't seem like any collusion or cheating is going on. If someone really likes Westbrook and wants to overpay to get him, or can afford taking a big hit in big man stats, then let them do it.
      No cheating, no collusion, no veto.
      Still, bad move on the guy getting Westbrook's side in my opinion, but no veto needed.

    • willis

      Re: D12/Westbrook Trade...VETO????

      willis by willis . Jan 29, 2013 5:37 PM . Permalink

      well dwight's value definitely goes up with FTM instead of FT% but westbrook's goe...

      well dwight's value definitely goes up with FTM instead of FT% but westbrook's goes up with FGM instead of FG% and no TOs. i would say that i value westbrook more than dwight here but im not entirely sure. millsap is good but not the determining factor in this trade. what round they were drafted in is incredibly meaningless at this point. i dont see much reason to veto this

    • CWizzle

      Re: D12/Westbrook Trade...VETO????

      CWizzle by CWizzle . Jan 29, 2013 5:40 PM . Permalink

      Not veto worthy. I'd much rather have Howard/Milsap but it doesn't seem like any c...

      Not veto worthy. I'd much rather have Howard/Milsap but it doesn't seem like any collusion or cheating is going on. If someone really likes Westbrook and wants to overpay to get him, or can afford taking a big hit in big man stats, then let them do it.
      No cheating, no collusion, no veto.
      Still, bad move on the guy getting Westbrook's side in my opinion, but no veto needed.

    • TK

      Re: D12/Westbrook Trade...VETO????

      TK by TK . Jan 29, 2013 9:25 PM . Permalink

      Not veto worthy

      Not veto worthy