• Draft and Trade Talk Message Board

  • Tyler Durden Tyler Durden Dec 28, 2011 11:22 AM Flag

    answer mine i'll answer yours

    aldridge + ben gordon

    for

    lowry + noah


    good trade?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • I prefer lowry/noah

      answer mine, it's the curry for dwill one

    • i like lowry side bc u get more overall stats. ben gordon has stuff to prove after last years disaster but doesnt offer much besides couple pts and 3s. and they are stacked at the g position (stuckey, gordon, knight, bynum, and may play daye at g too). i see ben gordon coming off the bench only becuase he has done it successfully in chicago. lowry is a bulldog and i like his upside this year and noah would compliment him nicely too

    • Id do it.

      PG- Russel Westbrook (OKC-PG)
      SG- Kevin Martin (Hou-SG)
      G- Mike Conley (Mem-PG)
      SF- Rudy Gay (Mem-SF,PF)
      PF- Kevin Love (PF,C)
      F- Hedo Turkoglu (Orl- SF, PF)
      C- Javale McGee (Was-PF,C)
      C- Tyson Chandler (NY-C)
      Util- Roy Hibbert (Ind-C)
      Util- Devin Harris (Uta-PG)
      BN- Jameer Nelson (Orl- PG)
      BN- Rodney Stuckey (Det-PG,SG)
      BN- Paul George (Ind- SG, SF)

      FG%, FT%, PTS, 3PTM,AST, STL, RBS, BLK, TO

      10 Team H2H

      I asked people what they think of my team and they gave it around an 8.5 Rating out of 10. They said it would increase dramatically to a 9 or 10, if I traded one of my guards (Stuckey,Jameer) for another SF or Scorer and i was thinking why not Stephen Jackson? What do you think. Could i get Stephen Jackson for Rodney Stuckey. Jacksons off to a slow start, and they are both similarily rated. (Jackson 83, Stuckey 89).

      Offered - Rodney Stuckey (PG,SG)
      For
      Stephen Jackson (SG,SF)

      Do I win this trade, and is there a chance it gets accepted? Was it bad advice? Ill probably lose in assists trading stuckey for Jackson

      I have offered this traade and hope it gets accepted.

      • 2 Replies to NY4Life
      • its definitely a viable trade, but i'm intrigued by stuckey's 3-point shooting. it may be something he worked on in the off season. if he can nail that 3 ball consistently, he should be worth a bit more than jackson is.

        looks like a pretty well-rounded team. other than FG%, i don't see any gaping holes that need immediate attention. i would stick with that team for a few weeks before i make any big moves. like they say, if it ain't broke..

      • it definitely a viable trade, but i'm intrigued by stuckey's 3-point shooting. it may be something he worked on in the off season. if he can nail that 3 ball consistently, he should be worth a bit more than jackson is.

        looks like a pretty well-rounded team. other than FG%, i don't see any gaping holes that need immediate attention. i would stick with that team for a few weeks before i make any big moves. like they say, if it ain't broke..

    • thanks for the feedback, just answered everyone's question.

    • noah gives you more cats than aldridge but aldridge gives you more of the cats that he does give you. I dont really guy lowry yet. gordon has not competition for playing time right now so i think i would stick with what you have right now. may be a good trade though in a couple of weeks though

      plz go to mine on am i making a mistake

    • Yeah I like the Lowry/Noah side. Aldridge is a beast but Lowry has the sole PG responsibility on his team. Noah is pretty much a double-double guarantee with 2 blocks (ignore his first couple games, everyone is rusty).

      It's a pretty fair trade and it depends on what your team needs, but I make this trade especially if I need assists. Ben Gordon has not proven to me that he'll make too much fantasy impact yet.

    • Yeah I'd take that.. I think Aldridge has pretty much hit his ceiling and with Crawford/Felton coming in, his scoring will be down a bit from last year.

    • I think its a very good trade, I have Lowry on my fantasy team and he is doing really well for me. I remember Noah had a lot of rebounds last year before he got injured so I think if he can stay healthy Noah should be more than fine.

      My question is a bit longer so bear with me.

      Would you trade Nash, Harden and Humphries to get Curry, Eric Gordon, and Boris Diaw? I would have to get rid of a 5th round pick next year but pick up the guys 6th round pick. My team is:

      PG Steve Nash (Pho - PG)
      SG Kevin Martin (Hou - SG)
      G James Harden (OKC - SG,SF)
      SF LeBron James (Mia - SF,PF)
      PF Dirk Nowitzki (Dal - PF)
      F Chris Bosh (Mia - PF,C)
      C LaMarcus Aldridge (Por - PF,C)
      C DeMarcus Cousins (Sac - PF,C)
      Util Marcus Thornton (Sac - SG)
      Util Kris Humphries (NJ - PF)
      BN Danilo Gallinari (Den - SF)
      BN Kyle Lowry (Hou - PG)
      BN Paul George (Ind - SG,SF)

      FYI I can ask for Wall instead of Curry btw, so would you want Wall over Curry? Or should I keep Nash and Thorton. Thanks a lot!

    • Aldridge is a stud but Gordon has struggled in Detroit. You'll certainly gain scoring but that's about it in my opinion. Lowry's value is high.

      Answer mine please:

      "I was offered Monta Ellis and Michael Beasley for Tyreke Evans and Kevin Martin. I am pretty thin at the SF position and have a pretty good amount of PG's/SG's so I could afford to give up 2 guards but should I pull the trigger? "

      • 2 Replies to Pierre
      • sorry about the late reply.

        statistically, it won't make much of a difference, but it will take care of your positional need.

        personally, i'd hold on to evans because i think he'll get back to being a 20/5/5 guy this year. martin is a perennial health risk, but the same concerns can be raised of monta, whose daredevil playing style and league-high playing 40 mpg could bite him in the bum in this year's condensed season.

        injury-risk aside, i'd still stick with evans and martin because of the former's upside and the latter's nice FT impact, which isn't easy to find.

      • sorry about the late reply.

        statistically, it won't make much of a difference, but it will take care of your positional need.

        personally, i'd hold on to evans because i think he'll get back to being a 20/5/5 guy this year. martin is a perennial health risk, but the same concerns can be raised of monta, whose daredevil playing style and league-high playing 40 mpg could bite him in the bum in this year's condensed season.

        injury-risk aside, i'd still stick with evans and martin because of the former's upside and the latter's nice FT impact, which isn't easy to find.

 

Expert Fantasy Advice

Sign up for Yahoo Fantasy Football