• General Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • A Yahoo! User Oct 12, 2012 10:30 PM Flag

    Was the rest of the league right in vetoing.

    You would have gotten the better ens of the deal but they should not have vetoed it. Unless someone is trading Foster for Steve Smith or an out of contention guys tries to trade his good players to his buddy towards the end of the year then no trades should get vetoed. If the two parties are ok with it then let it go through.